Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Practice 1 out....WOW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2008, 05:39 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
subicpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: A300CAP
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by BrownGirls YUM
See item G.2. of the proposed ammendments to the LOA.

There's a link to it in the Special Message Line of 06-04-08 which can be found under the "stay informed" header on the right side of the FDX ALPA homepage.
Thanks for pointing that out! I think I may need a re-read...obviously missed that the first time around.

Not sure this is a bad deal. Gonna have to take a closer look...
subicpilot is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 06:18 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,199
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
If we are going to change the LOA again lets get the invol STV eligibility window changed back from 1 every 6 bid periods (LOA) to 1 in 14 (contract). This will fix one of the most blantant stick it to the junior guy provisions (at least in the LOA).
Excellent post.

Clearly, how often someone can be involuntarily STV'd is a "cost nuetral" issue for the company ---- 1 every 6 vs 1 every 14 is just a "senior" vs "junior" issue regarding "how protected" the top guys are from invol STV'd.

Please don't use the "don't worry, it will go senior argument" ---- cause if that's true, then you still won't mind changing it.

OK --- senior guys ---- here's a GREAT issue where you can show your willingness to "share the pain"....any takers?

This one's not about $$$...

...and you'd still get the best lines over in HKG if you got non-vol'd due to your seniority.

Perhaps, if I saw this type of change incorporated into the FDA LOA Amendment than I would believe we actually "negogiated" some significant improvements and would see a tangible example of how senior guys are stepping up to help out in trouble times.
DLax85 is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 06:20 AM
  #73  
gets every day off
 
Nitefrater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Retired MD11 Capt
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by BrownGirls YUM
See item G.2. of the proposed ammendments to the LOA.

There's a link to it in the Special Message Line of 06-04-08 which can be found under the "stay informed" header on the right side of the FDX ALPA homepage.
Note that this provision goes back and modifies the CBA, not just the LOA, and therefore this provision isn't limited to HKG domiciled pilots. It means that ANYONE with a HKG-CAN leg on their trip can be given GT by commercial carrier. Train and hydrofoil are specifically included, but nothing is excluded, so bus is fair game. It also applies to any other int'l location the SIG approves. NRT-HND? How about SFS-MNL by bus?

Note also that this little provision never made it to the MEC's "See what a great amendment to the LOA we got you" summary. Hmmmm

Last edited by Nitefrater; 06-18-2008 at 07:46 AM. Reason: clarity
Nitefrater is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 06:23 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,199
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
If we are going to change the LOA again lets get the invol STV eligibility window changed back from 1 every 6 bid periods (LOA) to 1 in 14 (contract). This will fix one of the most blantant stick it to the junior guy provisions (at least in the LOA).
Excellent post.

Clearly, how often someone can be involuntarily STV'd is a "cost nuetral" issue for the company ---- "1 every 6" vs "1 every 14" is just a "senior" vs "junior" issue regarding "how protected" the top guys are from invol STV'd.

OK --- senior guys ---- here's a GREAT issue where you can show your willingness to "share the pain"....any takers?

Please don't use the "don't worry, it will go senior argument" --- cause if that's true, then you still won't mind changing it.

And this one's not about $$$ or your permanent seat position over the next 3-5 years of stagnation...

...you'd still get the best lines over in HKG if you got non-vol'd due to your seniority.

Perhaps, if I saw this type of change incorporated into the FDA LOA Amendment than I would believe we actually "negogiated" some significant improvements and would see a tangible example of how senior guys are stepping up to help out in trouble times.

Final thought --- I wonder how many previously "mid-seniority" guys are "waking up" to this issue now that they may soon find themselves much more junior?

Last edited by DLax85; 06-18-2008 at 06:27 AM. Reason: spelling
DLax85 is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 07:11 AM
  #75  
gets every day off
 
Nitefrater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Retired MD11 Capt
Posts: 705
Default

double post deleted

Last edited by Nitefrater; 06-18-2008 at 07:58 AM. Reason: see text
Nitefrater is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 07:30 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Default

Yet another reason I am voting NO!!
USMCFDX is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 08:38 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by DLax85
Excellent post.

Clearly, how often someone can be involuntarily STV'd is a "cost nuetral" issue for the company ---- "1 every 6" vs "1 every 14" is just a "senior" vs "junior" issue regarding "how protected" the top guys are from invol STV'd.

OK --- senior guys ---- here's a GREAT issue where you can show your willingness to "share the pain"....any takers? ...
Now that I think about, the company and the union have already established the policy of adjusting an LOA mid vote. Why not change the LOA currently up for vote.

Remember when the union and their buddies in management were sweating the original LOA vote over the 90 day invol? It took about two weeks of "that was never the intention" denials before they agreed to change the LOA during the vote. It only took the company 3 pages of legalese to make a one word pen and ink change.

Albie,

Now that the block 7 dudes are frozen for the next 5 years; looks like your the block rep most impacted by this 1 every 6 bone job.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:12 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

True. However, I think there will be another dozen who pop up to fill HKG. I got a call from an MD11 guy today considering it...

Lots of folks are looking hard at the move packages and the ability to sell out of a house. I think some folks will bid out just to unload homes in areas with declining values...

Again--we'll see. My thoughts on STV are well documented.
Albief15 is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:15 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Just because all the slots are filled does not mean that STV will not happen.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 06-18-2008, 09:46 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownGirls YUM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by Nitefrater
Note also that this little provision never made it to the MEC's "See what a great amendment to the LOA we got you" summary. Hmmmm
Yeah, well how about this gem?


N. Ongoing Implementation Measures
The parties recognize that the details involved in opening and operating foreign pilot bases are varied and fluid. Other measures facilitating the operation of the pilot bases in CDG and HKG and supporting the pilots based there may be implemented if agreed upon in writing by the Vice President, Labor Relations Law and the ALPA FedEx MEC Chairman.


Discuss.

Last edited by BrownGirls YUM; 06-18-2008 at 03:03 PM.
BrownGirls YUM is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DinoJet727
Cargo
6
05-28-2008 11:56 AM
jagplt
Cargo
7
05-19-2008 11:39 AM
SNIZ
Cargo
17
05-02-2008 06:32 PM
Paddles
Cargo
63
05-01-2008 03:24 PM
Aviatormar
Regional
28
07-14-2007 07:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices