UPS Aircraft
06-06-2008, 07:17 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 362
Well, if they need to hire for those positions I'm sure myself and the other poolies would be more than happy to take that offer.
Shenzhen base, I'll have to talk to the wife first :-)
Shenzhen base, I'll have to talk to the wife first :-)
Last edited by ERJ Jay; 06-06-2008 at 07:24 AM. Reason: typos
06-06-2008, 08:36 AM
#42
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Capt.
Posts: 42
ERJ - As a fellow poolie, since 6/07, I agree, we would be more than happy to take that offer.
Now to start working on the wife........
JP
06-06-2008, 09:43 AM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,701
Not as far fetched as you may think. At the end of the contract talks the company was envisioning an ANC Z domicile for the 767. The trips would all being with a deadhead aboard one of our flights to get you into position, and then you would fly intra asia for your trip before returning home (ANC) on one of our planes again. Nothing to stop them from doing it and apparently they feel that there is a lot of gain there.
06-06-2008, 10:02 AM
#44
Tri-tanic operator
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Not as far fetched as you may think. At the end of the contract talks the company was envisioning an ANC Z domicile for the 767. The trips would all being with a deadhead aboard one of our flights to get you into position, and then you would fly intra asia for your trip before returning home (ANC) on one of our planes again. Nothing to stop them from doing it and apparently they feel that there is a lot of gain there.
Its almost too logical ...
06-06-2008, 10:36 AM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 362
Oh good, then it won't happen. That was close.
Seriously though, I want UPS to do that which makes money. If it's a ANCZ base, so be it. The passenger carriers obviously can't seam to figure that out.
I'm just glad that ANC move LOA included all future aircraft so that it wouldn't have to be re-negotiated every time.
Seriously though, I want UPS to do that which makes money. If it's a ANCZ base, so be it. The passenger carriers obviously can't seam to figure that out.
I'm just glad that ANC move LOA included all future aircraft so that it wouldn't have to be re-negotiated every time.
06-06-2008, 10:49 AM
#46
Banned
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 540
That being said then the company should be looking at an Europe domicile I would think...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
