Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Contrarian View to Age 65 >

FDX - Contrarian View to Age 65

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Contrarian View to Age 65

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2008, 04:48 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ranger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD-11/10 Captain
Posts: 533
Default

Coincidentally, I got my first retirement estimate from the retirement administration folks on Monday. I'm still a ways off but I have this strange habit of planning ahead and wanting to know what the hell is going on. Anyway, when I do retire at age 60 I'll have 21 years of pensionable service with the company. And there is no mention of an early retirement penalty because the age is now 65. I'm no contract expert (understatement) but a lot of the content is based on both language and intent. If the contract was signed with the "intent" that the retirement age is 60 then the contractual retirement age is 60. I sure hope that's right because it'd screw up 30+ years of planning and what's-her-name would be irritated about that.
Ranger is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 04:50 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KnightFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,433
Default

Originally Posted by nightfreight
Knight,

Call me greedy, but I want to keep the retirement age at 60 and get a raise as well. Any TA that changes the retirement age gets a NO vote from me....
It's not greedy. It's merely maintaining what we have. What's wrong with standing up and fighting for what we have? I'm with you.
KnightFlyer is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 05:08 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheBaron's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by Tuck
No - disagree. My Dad and all of his friends are right around 62-63 and they look pretty decent - all worked full careers not in flying. Compared to my Dad, most of our senior FDX Captains look awful - I'm not just talking about the folks walking around MEM during the am hub turn - I mean just about anyone. In fact when I fly with a 55+ guy that looks good I make particular note - and it's a rare thing. Obviously genetics and how you live your life make a big difference but taken as a group, our crew force does not age well compared to the rest of the US population - especially the college educated demographic we represent.
I agree that we have a lot of Captains (and senior F/O's) that look fairly well beat to hell, but a lot of that has to do with the circumstances you are seeing them under. In the short term, everyone looks a little worse for wear at 3:00am (unless you have beer goggles on.) I doubt your dad and his friends would look much better after a week of hub turns...something that you can recover from after a few nights of normal sleep.
I'm not arguing that our constantly shifting sleep patterns, out of sync with our circadian rhythm, aren't bad for our long term health. There are enough studies out there to show that it does have numerous health consequences, but most of them are associated and not causal. People that work overnight and rotating shifts tend to eat poorer diets and get less exercise; knowing that, how we treat our bodies on layovers has a huge impact on how well we will survive into our retirement years.
Last point...I don't want to be forced to work until I'm 65, regardless of the shape I'm in. When I started this career it was with the understanding that age 60 was the mandatory retirement age. I thought (and still do) that being forced to retire at 60 was unfair but I accepted it for what it was. Now that it has changed, I have no problem with people that choose to fly to the new regulated age. My only complaint is that so many seem willing to acquiesce to a change in the "normal" retirement for fear we will have to give something up to keep it. The choice should remain with the pilot, not the company, and we as a group should not give up anything to keep it that way. Anything less deserves a "no" vote.
TheBaron is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 06:51 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by mrzog2138
... The moment our MEC endorsed and was a advocate of changing the retirment age to 65, we lost the age 60 retirement in our contract...
WRONG!!!!!!

Read the contract. Read the PBB. "Normal retirement date" is age 60.

Last edited by Busboy; 05-11-2008 at 07:03 PM.
Busboy is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 06:58 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,338
Default

Pay Raise and Retire at 60....that's what I'm talking about.

You can argue all you want about whether or not working past 60 in this business kills you sooner.

But I can tell you it will play hell with your time off..........and your retirement........

If you think our choices are all about either owrk or death, then please stay the heck away from our negotiating committee....there is a lot more to life than work and death....particularly when that work primarily lines someone else's pocket.
Laughing_Jakal is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 10:07 PM
  #36  
Gets Off
 
md11phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Nordskog Industries Field Technician
Posts: 688
Default

I vote all three.

25 years= full retirement.
Age 60 remains
Pay raises continue beyond mere inflation

Call it a pipe dream but with our current union leadership I'm going to need a lot of convincing that we don't deserve otherwise.
md11phlyer is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:16 PM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 83
Default

Everyone has always said the contract states age 60 as the retirement age. Where does it say it?

Last edited by steel; 05-15-2008 at 07:27 PM.
steel is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:49 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by steel
Everyone has always said the contract states age 60 as the retirement age. Where does it say it?

Contract says no changes unless agreed upon. Contract also says the benefits are defined in the PBB. The PBB says normal retirement is age 60. PBB retirement section can't be changed with out our approval. https://pilot.fedex.com/contract/pbb...nt_dates.shtml
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:04 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 221
Default

Not only should we keep the retirement age at 60, we should allow pilots with 25 years to retire without penalty if they are below the "retirement age".
I'm with you. Although 20 would be nice. Buh bye at 52! Pipe dream with the current front office.
purpledog is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:55 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11
Posts: 315
Default

2nd hand rumor...
Was told today by a friend of our new Neg Chairman that JL will be negotiating on the company side next contract and the first order of business is new retirement age = 65 or earlier with penalty.
BonesF15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices