FDX - Contrarian View to Age 65
#31
Coincidentally, I got my first retirement estimate from the retirement administration folks on Monday. I'm still a ways off but I have this strange habit of planning ahead and wanting to know what the hell is going on. Anyway, when I do retire at age 60 I'll have 21 years of pensionable service with the company. And there is no mention of an early retirement penalty because the age is now 65. I'm no contract expert (understatement) but a lot of the content is based on both language and intent. If the contract was signed with the "intent" that the retirement age is 60 then the contractual retirement age is 60. I sure hope that's right because it'd screw up 30+ years of planning and what's-her-name would be irritated about that.
#32
It's not greedy. It's merely maintaining what we have. What's wrong with standing up and fighting for what we have? I'm with you.
#33
No - disagree. My Dad and all of his friends are right around 62-63 and they look pretty decent - all worked full careers not in flying. Compared to my Dad, most of our senior FDX Captains look awful - I'm not just talking about the folks walking around MEM during the am hub turn - I mean just about anyone. In fact when I fly with a 55+ guy that looks good I make particular note - and it's a rare thing. Obviously genetics and how you live your life make a big difference but taken as a group, our crew force does not age well compared to the rest of the US population - especially the college educated demographic we represent.
I'm not arguing that our constantly shifting sleep patterns, out of sync with our circadian rhythm, aren't bad for our long term health. There are enough studies out there to show that it does have numerous health consequences, but most of them are associated and not causal. People that work overnight and rotating shifts tend to eat poorer diets and get less exercise; knowing that, how we treat our bodies on layovers has a huge impact on how well we will survive into our retirement years.
Last point...I don't want to be forced to work until I'm 65, regardless of the shape I'm in. When I started this career it was with the understanding that age 60 was the mandatory retirement age. I thought (and still do) that being forced to retire at 60 was unfair but I accepted it for what it was. Now that it has changed, I have no problem with people that choose to fly to the new regulated age. My only complaint is that so many seem willing to acquiesce to a change in the "normal" retirement for fear we will have to give something up to keep it. The choice should remain with the pilot, not the company, and we as a group should not give up anything to keep it that way. Anything less deserves a "no" vote.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
#35
Pay Raise and Retire at 60....that's what I'm talking about.
You can argue all you want about whether or not working past 60 in this business kills you sooner.
But I can tell you it will play hell with your time off..........and your retirement........
If you think our choices are all about either owrk or death, then please stay the heck away from our negotiating committee....there is a lot more to life than work and death....particularly when that work primarily lines someone else's pocket.
You can argue all you want about whether or not working past 60 in this business kills you sooner.
But I can tell you it will play hell with your time off..........and your retirement........
If you think our choices are all about either owrk or death, then please stay the heck away from our negotiating committee....there is a lot more to life than work and death....particularly when that work primarily lines someone else's pocket.
#36
I vote all three.
25 years= full retirement.
Age 60 remains
Pay raises continue beyond mere inflation
Call it a pipe dream but with our current union leadership I'm going to need a lot of convincing that we don't deserve otherwise.
25 years= full retirement.
Age 60 remains
Pay raises continue beyond mere inflation
Call it a pipe dream but with our current union leadership I'm going to need a lot of convincing that we don't deserve otherwise.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Contract says no changes unless agreed upon. Contract also says the benefits are defined in the PBB. The PBB says normal retirement is age 60. PBB retirement section can't be changed with out our approval. https://pilot.fedex.com/contract/pbb...nt_dates.shtml
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 221
Not only should we keep the retirement age at 60, we should allow pilots with 25 years to retire without penalty if they are below the "retirement age".
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11
Posts: 315
2nd hand rumor...
Was told today by a friend of our new Neg Chairman that JL will be negotiating on the company side next contract and the first order of business is new retirement age = 65 or earlier with penalty.
Was told today by a friend of our new Neg Chairman that JL will be negotiating on the company side next contract and the first order of business is new retirement age = 65 or earlier with penalty.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post