Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FedEx sees profit fall, glum forecast >

FedEx sees profit fall, glum forecast

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FedEx sees profit fall, glum forecast

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2008, 05:07 AM
  #21  
Retired
 
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: whale wrangler
Posts: 3,527
Default

Originally Posted by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Got ya, I knew it, I was just testing y'all...

"Every other commercial airline pilot envies you right now.....enjoy it. You are the highest paid, best vacation, most schedule flexibility pilots around....enjoy it. After all you could be trying to work at US Air"

Very true - except "other commercial airlines" don't have to deal with the over 60 pilots coming back to the front seat - you see their >60 pilots are where they should be - retired...
Well thats not quite right and by the way we will all be over 60 one day and will be making the decision to stay or leave and the folks behind us will be saying the same as what some are saying today about the old fellas who are staying on.Savvy?


Please return your seat to the upright position.
DYNASTY HVY is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 07:20 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by DYNASTY HVY
Well thats not quite right and by the way we will all be over 60 one day and will be making the decision to stay or leave and the folks behind us will be saying the same as what some are saying today about the old fellas who are staying on.Savvy?
While you will have a choice to retire at 60, 61, 65 or even later if you go to the FE seat (I'm guessing since I don't know your age) - I'm certain that option won’t be available to me and other junior guys when it's our turn to retire. Of course, we'll be able to retire "early" at 60 but not without a pension penalty.

The only true winners here are the guys over 60 AND pilots who are already secure in the left seat - in other words those who aren't risking getting bumped from the left seat. For them, the new rule means an additional 5 years of making well over quarter million dollars a year - no wonder most of them are OK with the new rule.

This thread is not really about age 60 debate but since you’re comparing apples to oranges I had to reply…
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 08:09 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: MD11 CPT
Posts: 1,077
Default

Originally Posted by Daniel Larusso
You're right Sideshow. I wasn't trying to bait Jetjok, I was just pointing out that I think it's a little naive to think that 4 mos. into a huge change to everyone's careers that was great for some and not so great for a lot more, that people are just going to forget about it and move on. Especially in a downturn and working for an airline that claims it's overstaffed.
Oh yeah...I agree.

The only group of humans that hold grudges over pretty much anything more than pilots (regarding loss of seniority/seat status) are women . So imagine if you will a woman pilot who loses her captain seat because of a geezer! Duck and cover for 20 years.

Seriously...look at the grudges still festering to this day (in no particular order/magnitude):

Reno Air/AA/TWA
USAir/Piedmont/PSA/AWA
Allegheny/Mohawk
Capitol/UAL
NWA/Republic
Flying Tigers/FDX
DAL/Western
SWA/Morris (maybe not so bad)

And there has to be many others I have forgotten. Imagine the mythical national master seniority list and the grudges that would create!
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 03-26-2008, 01:15 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
koz2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Airbus F/O
Posts: 297
Default

Originally Posted by BOYCAPTAIN
not planning on doing any hiring...planning to have huge excess bid and the bottom guys will have a choice to either keep their job at FDX (HKG or CDG) or not to keep their job....they are not junior manning with this method..watch and see!

wow.... joined yesterday (3/25), most posts are flame worthy (next contract offers, FDA's) - but you speak as though you're in the "know" with both management and union.. Only person like that is DW as he'll be our next VP of flight ops .

If they furlough, our system couldn't support the 48/68 hours schedules. They would just STV rather than furlough... But I'm sure you'll answer this with a "just wait and see..."

Oh not to mention that by the time/cost it would take to get everyone retrained.
koz2000 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lambo
Cargo
5
07-12-2007 05:55 PM
TonyC
Major
0
01-24-2006 06:21 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
3
11-30-2005 08:42 PM
Sir James
Major
0
10-25-2005 12:40 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 07:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices