Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
I need some help with making a decision >

I need some help with making a decision

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

I need some help with making a decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2008, 12:13 PM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Default I need some help with making a decision

I know how much everyone likes to give opinions. I've got the bare minimums for some of the majors (2200 total, 800 turb. PIC, 1300 Multi, sll of the turbine and most multi are in king airs on a 135 cert.) and recently lost my job. I have the opportunity to take a job PIC on a CJ and King Air. Or I can take a position with a regional who operates the largest fleet of ERJ 170. My ultimate goal is to get on with a Major or of course UPS of Fedex. What is more important PIC turbine or 121 turbine even if it's right seat?
Dave is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 12:25 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Without 1000 TPIC I'd go with the corp gig. After that consider getting Part 121 experience. Your total time and TPIC are too low for UPS/FDX right now.
Slice is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 12:46 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: DAL-S, B
Posts: 126
Default

I can't really comment on FedEx or UPS. The only people I know that have gotten hired over there had quite a bit of 121 PIC time. I'm not sure if they typically hire people out of King Airs and CJs. Maybe ask over on the Cargo board and see what those guys say.

If you're happy with getting hired by a major that flies passengers (CAL, DAL, UAL, NWA, JetBlue, AirTran, etc) - then maybe stick with the corporate stuff and get about another 1000 hours of Turbine PIC and I bet you'd be competitive. I know several people who have come from the corporate world and are now working at the majors.

An important question is: How long is the upgrade time projected to be at this E170 operator? SIC E170 time is turning out to be a dime-a-dozen these days. You really need the PIC time to get looked at seriously, and I don't know that "800 hours in a turboprop a few years ago" is going to hold as much weight.

I agree with the previous poster that getting more PIC time and also getting some 121 time will cover all of your bases, but I'm just wondering if that would end up wasting more time in the long run... Maybe if you just stuck with one or the other you would be better off...

At any rate, I'll give you the same advice I've heard my whole career... Never turn down an upgrade. Never turn down PIC Turbine time. That would be my 2 cents, but definitely get more input.
E1Out is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 01:11 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Quality PIC is valuable. Jet PIC is best.
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 01:26 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FedExBusBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus Driver
Posts: 521
Default

Do we still have the requirement of turboprop PIC being over 12,500 MTOGW or am I thinking of somewhere else?? I don't think a King Air qualifies over 12,500........
FedExBusBoy is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 01:30 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
koz2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Airbus F/O
Posts: 297
Default

King Air 90's, 100's or 200's are below 12,500 but 300, 350 are above. But we do hire people with only King Air (less than 12,500) time.
koz2000 is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 01:42 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jdec141's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD11 Capt
Posts: 152
Default

Originally Posted by FedExBusBoy
Do we still have the requirement of turboprop PIC being over 12,500 MTOGW or am I thinking of somewhere else?? I don't think a King Air qualifies over 12,500........
i think the weight restriction is for reciprocating props (eg. DC-3) no weight restriction on turboprop
jdec141 is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 01:46 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FedExBusBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus Driver
Posts: 521
Default

Originally Posted by koz2000
King Air 90's, 100's or 200's are below 12,500 but 300, 350 are above. But we do hire people with only King Air (less than 12,500) time.

THX for the clarification........the 350 is sweet IMO.......'
FedExBusBoy is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 11:54 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Go try to get a job with the military flying F-18's or F-16's in Iraq. Much more gratifying. Pays about the same anymore too. And I guarantee it is much sweeter than whatever a 350 is.
FR8Hauler is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 06:03 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
boost's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 156
Default

And with the year it takes to get your package together and get assigned a training date, two years of training to get your wings and your ten year commitment, you will be ready to come to the majors about the same time the planes start flying themselves!!! Of course now you are more than half way to 20yrs so why not stick around a few more years and get that retirement. LOL
For a guy in your situation, who already has some time and wants to be an airline guy, I'd go with the place that you can get the most turbine pic the fastest. Seems to me like a lot of the regionals are hiring guys straight into the left seat and that you would have enough flight time to do that. You have enough time to go to almost any regional you want and worst case scenario, you could pick one with a short upgrade time.
There are some sweet corporate gigs out there but don't think you will get as much time as in the airlines. Also make sure that you talk to some corporate guys first, I did a short stint in a King Air years ago and the flying was fun although mainly short trips with lots of waiting. Just wasn't for me in the long run. You're almost there man. Good luck with the job hunt!

Last edited by boost; 02-01-2008 at 06:12 AM.
boost is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mr Stanwick
Cargo
5
12-16-2007 10:42 AM
maximaman
Hangar Talk
18
09-25-2007 09:40 AM
ChinookDriver47
Regional
14
07-12-2007 07:27 AM
spinproof
Major
1
12-06-2005 11:11 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
06-06-2005 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices