Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Hub Turn Meeting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2008, 03:37 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,124
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy
Is it going to make a difference in how you vote?
Look there's little question that McCain hates commercial pilots - just look back at some of the stuff he's said in the past - before he had presidential hopes.

Curious to see that in last month's ALPA magazine (yeah I know it generally sucks) they had Q&A for all the presidential candidates. All of the Democratic hopefuls answered in a positive light (i.e. pro-ALPA answers) although Hillary's was full of political mumbo jumbo where Obama gave straight answers. None of the GOP candidates even bothered to answer.
Tuck is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 04:02 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

I'm not sure what you're point is...

I was just asking those that have heartburn with a labor organization endorsing a candidate that supports labor organizations, if ALPA's endorsement will affect their vote?

I doubt it.

But, I'm not going to get into a p**sing contest with anyone about it, on here. As, we aren't supposed to talk politics. Actually, I wouldn't get into a p**sing contest with anyone about it, anywhere. For that matter.
Busboy is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 08:46 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,199
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
It took so long to negotiate our contract because it took brown that long. Why was it in Fred's interest to make a deal early last contract? (Rhetorical) What incentives did we put in this contract to encourage a quick deal next time? (not rhetorical)
Spot on!

...and does anyone remember the event that shortly preceeded the TA offer?

UPS approving their contract.

Did FEDEX really want the UPS marketing/sales staff out making cold calls on our customers letting them know their pilots were under contract, while FDX was having protracted contract negogiations as we headed into peak??

It is amazing the slow dance UPS and FDX play in our little oligopoly...and how interelated we really are.
DLax85 is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 08:54 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,199
Question

Originally Posted by Laughing_Jakal
....The MEC guys actually had to seed questions and discuss things until people got the courage to speak up....
Jakal
Overall, Excellent post

....however, why do you think people need to muster "the courage to speak up" at these meetings?

Who's responsible for setting the tone in a question and answer period?

Does the way questions are answered by the speakers encourage or discourage audience participation?

What precedents were recently set during the LOA hub turn meetings?

Yes, effective communication does cut both ways.

A'o Aloha,



DLax
DLax85 is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 08:55 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by Bohica
Seeing as I have pledged to try to be more tactful on these boards, I have to say that I got a great laugh out of that post Tony.

This is not flame, and I mean no disrespect. But ALPA PAC will never see a penny of my money, ever. I will pay my taxes, er dues, attend our local meetings and bang my head against the wall of the MEC. I will continue to engage as best I can in the sausage making process that passes for union representation and participation around here.

A couple of things I won't do, however. I will never again participate in an ALPA survey, and I won't ever send money to ALPA PAC. I have moved on past age 60, but I have learned my lesson about our union and unity. Why in the wild, wild world of sports would I ever, ever, ever participate in a poll that the leadership has proven they will ignore, or provide a PAC that has demonstrated that they are lobbying completely 180 degrees out from my interests any more money to further lobby against me?

I'd be surprised if ALPA PAC pulls in 75% of what it did last year because ALPA leadership has completely disenfranchised so many pilots with its Benedict Arnold on age 60.

ALPA PAC, what a joke. That is a good one. ALPA just cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars and they now want me to donate more to the cause? That really is too much.

With all due respect, and no whining, of course. Just one disgruntled pilot's opinion. If others want to support the PAC, all the more power to them.
I hear you brother. I feel your pain. They won't get a dime out of me either. Just wait in a few days they will tell you how to vote too.
FR8Hauler is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 08:59 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,199
Question

Originally Posted by Laughing_Jakal
...Regarding the webcast, etc....while it has merit and should be used for official presentations, I think hubturn meetings should allow a certain level of "Academic Freedom"....you can get a frank discussion, you can get a public discussion.....you can want both...you're not going to get it....Jakal
Once again --- overall, Excellent post.

...but how is a "hub turn mtg" not already a public discussion?

...how does at least broadcasting that meeting in real time over a secure network to those same pilots who are elgible to walk into that meeting somehow change the target audience and therefore change the level of debate?

It appears that web-based technology may actually allow the union to hold a hub turn meeting in everyone's home town --- every time.

Why are some so adamant about not even giving it a try?

Last edited by DLax85; 01-31-2008 at 09:01 PM. Reason: typo
DLax85 is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 11:45 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FR8Hauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Default

Originally Posted by DLax85
Once again --- overall, Excellent post.

...but how is a "hub turn mtg" not already a public discussion?

...how does at least broadcasting that meeting in real time over a secure network to those same pilots who are elgible to walk into that meeting somehow change the target audience and therefore change the level of debate?

It appears that web-based technology may actually allow the union to hold a hub turn meeting in everyone's home town --- every time.

Why are some so adamant about not even giving it a try?
I don't think it is "some" of the membership. I think it is the ALPA SS that keeps it from happening. Some BS about the lawyer's not thinking it is a good idea for us to be informed.
FR8Hauler is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 02:48 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Toccata's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: DC10 Captain
Posts: 284
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy
I was just asking those that have heartburn with a labor organization endorsing a candidate that supports labor organizations, if ALPA's endorsement will affect their vote?.
I'm not in the group you're asking, but I'll answer anyway. Yes.

If ALPA endorses who I was planning on voting for, I'll need to re-evaluate. ALPA National has done very little well lately, in my opinion, other then put spin on decisions detrimental to the profession.
Toccata is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 04:22 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by FR8Hauler
I don't think it is "some" of the membership. I think it is the ALPA SS that keeps it from happening. Some BS about the lawyer's not thinking it is a good idea for us to be informed.
Actually, I suspect it's the lawyers idea for not making our "leadership" accountable for the things they say publicly? (in a format that the membership could store on their computers and play back to remind the leadership) I'll bet ALL the stuff posted on the ALPA website and ALPA mailings get the "legal review" BEFORE they get posted?
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 02-01-2008, 04:43 AM
  #60  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark
Actually, I suspect it's the lawyers idea for not making our "leadership" accountable for the things they say publicly? (in a format that the membership could store on their computers and play back to remind the leadership) I'll bet ALL the stuff posted on the ALPA website and ALPA mailings get the "legal review" BEFORE they get posted?
DW's a politican. Do we remind politicans of all the stuff they promised? What do they say? They blame everybody else. Remember the last missive from DW on the age 60 legislation and the bids? Nuff said.........( BTW, want to make any bets whether the Co. tapes every union meeting in the crew room? I would if I was them.)
AerisArmis is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jagplt
Cargo
96
01-14-2008 07:48 AM
Wild Bill
Cargo
0
01-08-2008 05:43 PM
PastV1
Cargo
6
07-27-2007 08:24 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
3
07-21-2007 05:36 AM
FedExBusBoy
Cargo
17
06-29-2007 12:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices