Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Improving LOA helps company's bottom line! >

FDX - Improving LOA helps company's bottom line!

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Improving LOA helps company's bottom line!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2008, 10:41 AM
  #11  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by skypine27
I really love that "This is the best deal we could get" line.

Then, w/o us even asking the Company, they (the Company):
  • Reduce invol STV from 3 months to 1 month
  • Increase shipping allowance from 500 lbs free, to 500lbs free + an additional 500lbs at a discounted rate
  • Add 10000 dollars deposit money
  • Increase shipping from 500lbs free and 500lbs additional @ discounted rate to simply 1000lbs free
I guess our MEC really knew what they were talking about when they said "This is the best deal we could get!" and "there was NO money left on the table."

Imagine what we could have gotten, if as a Union, we had said "F that" and walked away from the table. Or, failing that, if, as a crew force we'd voted 68% NO to the LOA. How would the FDA staffing look then? What would the company be offering now when the FO side of CDG and HKG went COMPLETELY unfilled on bid 07-03?

The sad thing is:

From emailing the people in my new hire class while the LOA was being voted on, I've determined:
3/4 of them are sitting in the right seat of the 727, based in MEM. They go to work, then go home. They've never considered thinking about work outside the cockpit. They've never logged onto APC. They don't even know what it is. They occasionally read the emails pumped out by FedEx ALPA, except for the ones which list which pairings are DPs. They blindly followed the Unions advice of "Vote for the LOA, it's the best we're gonna get. Plus, great scope!". One guy is ex Navy and from American Airlines, and actually used the line "I don't think we should call the companys bluff on this one guys. Scope is real important." They've never heard of any of the above points I listed, and STILL think the MEC is doing the best they can.

And the really, really sad thing is:

There's a lot more people just like them.
Yep, we are our own worst enemies. It looks like close to 68% took the blue pill!
iarapilot is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 12:10 PM
  #12  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default

Not fan of the LOA. That being said, we did indeed do it to ourselves. A supermajority in an election, in congress or various other institutions (unions, stockholder meetings) is generally know to be 66.6% (2/3) or greater. So........yes, the LOA was voted in by a Supermajority.
FLMD11CAPT is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 01:57 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bohica's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 281
Default

More like a STUPORMAJORITY!
Bohica is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 04:28 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HerkDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A300 F/O
Posts: 217
Red face

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Blaming the company is indeed stupid. Blaming the Union leadership that threatened to resign if we voted down the best were gonna get LOA is not.
Never got the word that they would resign if it got voted down...Man, that would have made the LOA getting voted down even better! Too bad people weren't smart enought to take them up on the offer; it would have been much easier than attempting a recall.
HerkDriver is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 04:32 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HerkDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A300 F/O
Posts: 217
Default

P.S. Don't blame me; I'm a 32%er.
HerkDriver is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 04:56 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by HerkDriver
Never got the word that they would resign if it got voted down...Man, that would have made the LOA getting voted down even better! Too bad people weren't smart enought to take them up on the offer; it would have been much easier than attempting a recall.
The way I remember it "A no vote is a vote of no confidence in the NC and the MEC" something along the lines of the company will have no faith in them or us blah blah blah.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 06:56 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fdxShark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Excessed B-727 Capt
Posts: 115
Default

68% hurts. Knowing that we were only 19% from narrowly swinging it the other way, completely kills me.
fdxShark is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
54
12-30-2007 12:24 AM
magic rat
Cargo
14
12-15-2007 11:25 AM
MaxKts
Cargo
25
08-02-2007 03:40 AM
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
46
07-17-2007 07:34 AM
TonyM
Cargo
5
07-04-2007 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices