Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX--Furlough not possible?  Think again... >

FDX--Furlough not possible? Think again...

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX--Furlough not possible? Think again...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2007, 01:47 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MAWK90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Michael Vick's favorite animal
Posts: 267
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
If you overman the Airbus, 757 and MD11 CA and FO seats with excessed folks from the DC10 (like it appears we are doing), then you have your 777 awardees without any secondaries.

No, I didn't forget about the 777. It's impact will much smaller than previously thought when balanced against our excess of pilots.
So you are telling me you think that excessed bottom 20% as it is guys will be able to hold the 777 when it shows up? Wishful thinking. That jet will go very senior.

If you are referring to the over 60 crowd that is about to move up to MD and BUS captain, they will be over 63 by the time the 777 shows up and my money says the company won't train 'em, especially when you and I BOTH know the 777 will be the SAME PAYRATE as what they are already on.
MAWK90 is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:13 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by MAWK90
How about getting rid of Carryover! Create a two tiered line structure, kinda like RA and RB. BLG-A would cover regular months, BLG-B would start sometime around the 25th of the month and cover the carryover.

If you lower my RLG to 48 and keep C/O for the senior guys, that ain't gonna fly for me.

There better be some creative ideas at the roundtable or this 20 yr ALPA vet will leave his pin at home.
That is why I said move the bid month start day to sunday, that would eliminate a lot of carry over. Then you could eliminate C-I-C priority make up. Give the guy a choice of what to drop new trip or old trip but make him fight the VIPS busy to fly extra.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:17 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 53
Default

Guys, ALPA sucks- plain and simple. They will not look after the junior guy. I've been down the "F" road before and ALPA did nothing to help then or during the seniority "integration" at TWA/AA. How many times have they screwed the pilot here just this year. Let's see- Age 60, LOA, to mention a couple. Now, why would they cancel part of a bid and re-issue it? Obviously they needed the 150+ secondary vacancies they awarded on the last bid. Did that need suddenly go away? Don't think so. So now, these 150+ F/O's get hosed while they re-issue the bid to let the over 60 crowd bid back. Why would they do this? Stay tuned. Next week should be interesting.

P.S.- I'm not usually pessimistic. Just ****ed right now at the absurdity of what's going on. Been furloughed before and still a little gun-shy. Let's pray that a miracle happens and ALPO get's their head out of their butt, and does something to benefit this entire crew force.
purplepilot is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:24 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by MAWK90
So you are telling me you think that excessed bottom 20% as it is guys will be able to hold the 777 when it shows up? Wishful thinking. That jet will go very senior.

If you are referring to the over 60 crowd that is about to move up to MD and BUS captain, they will be over 63 by the time the 777 shows up and my money says the company won't train 'em, especially when you and I BOTH know the 777 will be the SAME PAYRATE as what they are already on.

Mawk,

Let me explain my viewpoint.

I think the DC10 excess will overman the seats those guys go to. It will be a mix. The CAs will be CA on other aircraft. FOs and SOs will be CAs and FOs on other aircraft. Many will be on wide aircraft and some will choose 757.

I'm not talking about the over 60 crowd other than to say they will show up on FO and CA lists on aircraft and add to the excess. All this points to no movement for middle and bottom 727 folks. The widebody and 757 CA seats will all be full. With the FO seats overfilled. Only the top of the 727 list will have opportunities.

It doesn't matter who goes to the 777 for the junior guy and gal on the 727 trying to take advantage of secondaries as 777 awardees go to training. What matters to them is the manning in the seats 777 folks will come from.

I predict wideboy CA and wide FO seats to be so overmanned that the 777 bid will create few if any secondaries.

I'm not whining, not complaining. Just saying from my perspective things look different.
Gunter is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:26 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by USNFDX
  1.  
    1. The minimum bid period guarantee shall be reduced to a minimum of 48/60 CH before any pilot is furloughed. At least a full bid period must follow the announcement of this action. This provision shall only be used to prevent or delay a furlough.
Unless the company decides to blow off the CBA or we negotiate a side letter. There is no way the company can reduce the BLG 30%.
In red is the most important word in your quote. This is the min BLG, not the max. Even with a furlough, the max BLG will only be limited by min days off. The only impact to the company is no volunteer--Draft is okay though.

IMHO this provision benefits the company more than the pilots. They cut BLG, reduce overall crew cost, and dont have to dish out furlough pay or incur training/retraining costs.

Enjoy the new year...
Spur is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:34 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by purplepilot
Obviously they needed the 150+ secondary vacancies they awarded on the last bid. Did that need suddenly go away? Don't think so. So now, these 150+ F/O's get hosed while they re-issue the bid to let the over 60 crowd bid back. Why would they do this? Stay tuned. Next week should be interesting.

Let's pray that a miracle happens and ALPO get's their head out of their butt, and does something to benefit this entire crew force.

Excellent point.

My thoughts on the cancellation of the last two bids is this.


Many CA awards were due to forecast retirements. They will be reduced or eliminated. Therefore there will be fewer FO secondaries. The company would also like over 60 guys to go for FO seats for fear they would stay in the back if they don't go for it now.

But first they will redo the DC10 excess. With fewer or no retirements, this may eliminate the need or most of the domestic part of 07-03. 07-03 may have no domestic CA slots at all on it.

Lastly, the company would like at least a few of the over 60 guys to go back up front to CA or more preferably FO since secondaries will be further reduced and the excess on the 727 will be partially reduced.
Gunter is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Spur
In red is the most important word in your quote. This is the min BLG, not the max. Even with a furlough, the max BLG will only be limited by min days off. The only impact to the company is no volunteer--Draft is okay though.
Good point.

Min can go to 48/60.

But the spread has to stay at 13 hrs or less.
Gunter is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:47 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fecav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 675
Default

Man this is amazing. I just spent the last 3 hours looking for a new TV and dishwasher and in that time you guys have figured out the next 3 years of my life. Thanks, now I don't have to.
How about we all just enjoy our families and the Holiday season and let this all wash out in the next week or so before we start thinking about eating a bullet.
fecav8r is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:47 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MAWK90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Michael Vick's favorite animal
Posts: 267
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
That is why I said move the bid month start day to sunday, that would eliminate a lot of carry over. Then you could eliminate C-I-C priority make up. Give the guy a choice of what to drop new trip or old trip but make him fight the VIPS busy to fly extra.
Good idea there. To take it one step further, if we really got to the point of reductions in BLG, there better be NOBODY that has carryover without protecting min-days off. To me, that would be the same as crossing a picket line and the Union needs to adopt that approach. C/O is fine for you if your senior enough when times are good, but when it's coming out of my pocket and the potential is there to put somebody on the street, it's enough.
MAWK90 is offline  
Old 12-29-2007, 02:50 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MAWK90's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Michael Vick's favorite animal
Posts: 267
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
Mawk,

Let me explain my viewpoint.

I think the DC10 excess will overman the seats those guys go to. It will be a mix. The CAs will be CA on other aircraft. FOs and SOs will be CAs and FOs on other aircraft. Many will be on wide aircraft and some will choose 757.

I'm not talking about the over 60 crowd other than to say they will show up on FO and CA lists on aircraft and add to the excess. All this points to no movement for middle and bottom 727 folks. The widebody and 757 CA seats will all be full. With the FO seats overfilled. Only the top of the 727 list will have opportunities.

It doesn't matter who goes to the 777 for the junior guy and gal on the 727 trying to take advantage of secondaries as 777 awardees go to training. What matters to them is the manning in the seats 777 folks will come from.

I predict wideboy CA and wide FO seats to be so overmanned that the 777 bid will create few if any secondaries.

I'm not whining, not complaining. Just saying from my perspective things look different.
Understood Gunter. We need to all put our collective heads together and let our elected reps know how we feel.
MAWK90 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hamfisted
Cargo
52
06-22-2008 09:19 PM
Laxrox43
Cargo
77
06-05-2008 08:28 AM
fdxflyer
Cargo
14
12-22-2007 08:43 AM
noguardbaby
Cargo
35
11-12-2007 05:34 AM
angry tanker
Cargo
20
07-10-2007 03:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices