Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Someone who gets it..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2007, 01:58 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by Bohica
727: I know you, and most of the other proponents of the change disagree, and that is fine. I am convinced, however, that without ALPA getting behind this bill it wouldn't have passed. I do not believe our MEC's version of events either.
Actually, I don't know if you can really call me a proponent, as my entire contribution was answering some of the Wilson polls, and getting disgusted at the venom being thrown on this forum by the anti-change, and yes, the pro-change partisans. Threats, insults, and name-calling seem to indicate a lack of anything better to say. In 10 years, when I have to make the decision on retirement (and yes, I think retiring at 60 will still be an option) if someone is calling me the names and using the insults that you and some of your like-minded cohorts have thrown out, I may just stay a few years longer, just out of spite. Quite frankly, I'm surprised at your demeanor here, because you seem fairly normal in person (if you are indeed who I think you are.)
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 05:39 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,199
Default

Originally Posted by fdxflyer
...Although I basically agree with your criticism of DW, I will disagree with you on the A plan. I would have to imagine that it is now way overfunded based on the age change.....
Maybe currently, but if a company can show their A fund is "way over funded" it is allowed to slow or stop contributions until it is back to level again ---- and don't think they won't do that in a hearbeat to increase quarterly earnings and thus the stock price.

We need unrelentless vigilance on the health of the A fund at all times.
DLax85 is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 05:56 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bohica's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
Actually, I don't know if you can really call me a proponent, as my entire contribution was answering some of the Wilson polls, and getting disgusted at the venom being thrown on this forum by the anti-change, and yes, the pro-change partisans. Threats, insults, and name-calling seem to indicate a lack of anything better to say. In 10 years, when I have to make the decision on retirement (and yes, I think retiring at 60 will still be an option) if someone is calling me the names and using the insults that you and some of your like-minded cohorts have thrown out, I may just stay a few years longer, just out of spite. Quite frankly, I'm surprised at your demeanor here, because you seem fairly normal in person (if you are indeed who I think you are.)
Alright, that is it! That is where I draw the line. I've been called a lot of things, before, but "fairly normal" is the last straw! Now I'm really po'd.
Bohica is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 07:01 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: unskilled laborer
Posts: 353
Default

I am anti-change. I will always say that I can't believe enough people took the biggest perk of this job and lobbied to have it tossed out.

BUT - everyone on the list here at Fedex and I guess everywhere else needs to keep some perspective. We have all benefited top to bottom over age 60. Some will now prosper even more from the change. What do I mean? (BOhica must be freaking by now)

The argument is that these older guys kicked everyone out and now sit at the top. True. But all of us move up when someone leaves. Well, take a 10 year wide body FO. Over the last 10 years he has moved up in Seniority by people leaving at 60. Not 20 or 25 years of such movement for sure. Stagnation for a while? Absolutely. But there was some benefit there. It would have been better after 15 years, but he got more benefit than if it happened 5 years ago. Right?

The big losers are those who never got to move up at all and now will stagnate off of the list. None of us FEDEX guys are those people - we have a number and our multiplier is ticking off the years.

The perspective of time will let us know much more than we know today. Relax. Watch the autopilot fly the plane. Of course FH is a jerk despite charming words from JJ. Nobody should gloat like he does. My 2 cents.
fdxflyer is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 10:44 PM
  #35  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: BOHICA
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by FreightDawgyDog
I agree ham. I will have no heartburn for those who weren't part of the APAAD movement, or those that aren't rubbing it in our faces. I also will have no heartburn with those that do not have a full retirement from here or the military staying as well. For those that choose to stay, or come back, that have either, or both, I will have very little respect. Heartburn no, but no respect as well. But what the puck, no one really cares about what I think anyway, especially my union leadership.

While I won't waste any more of my time worrying about these guys, I won't waste any more time hoisting adult beverages with them on layovers either. I will continue to admire those that retire with dignity at Age 60 while they still can. Once that changes none of us will have a good choice unless we give even more up to get it. I can live very happily with all that I have said here and with no remorse knowing that no one suffered for what I have gained.
I'm curious how many of the people on this board that are *****ing about this new law will become rather large hypocrates when they continue flying until they reach 65...
Yoke Actuator is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 11:32 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by FliFast
It's my opinion that companies will look at a buyout or more liberal bypassing parameters versus the cascade of taining events, displacements, and a whole host of other effects.
Anyone else share my opinion or would like to add a contrasting view.
Thx,
FF
I hope you're right but I have my doubts. I think we'll see many return to the left seat only to "discover" some medical problems and then keep drawing a medical leave of absence for the next 5 years or so instead of "depleting" their A-plan, B-plan and the 401K. (What is it 60% of ~250K or so?)

Also, how old is our president? Is he over 60? If so, will he support the 90% of the crowd who'll be hurt by the change or the 10% crowd he belongs to? (I don't know his age)
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 06:04 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Packer Backer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by Yoke Actuator
I'm curious how many of the people on this board that are *****ing about this new law will become rather large hypocrates when they continue flying until they reach 65...
That is why we are *****ing! We have to work till 65. Now the "normal" retirement is 65 and if we get out "early" at 60, we will take a huge hit in our pension.
Packer Backer is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 06:19 AM
  #38  
Bourgeoisie
 
MEMFO4Ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 787 SO
Posts: 617
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Yoke Actuator
I'm curious how many of the people on this board that are *****ing about this new law will become rather large hypocrates when they continue flying until they reach 65...
I don't know about being hypocrites, since I fully expect the company will reduce the A fund multiplier and the B fund contribution. I can already hear the concession-speech message line from the MEC and NC now. The anti-change crowd will be coerced into working longer than age 60 just to recoup what they could have gotten under the old rules. It is naive to infer that the company will not take this advantage; they will. Their charge is to maximize shareholder wealth, not enhance the financial position of pilots.

This change is bad for everyone, except the guys that can fly the extra years under the current CBA. I personally do not think that our current situation will stand the next attack from management and their mongrel lawyers during Section 6.

I do not WANT to work longer (I don't know why anyone does), but I fear that I will have to, just to achieve the same financial outcome I see retired guys getting now.
MEMFO4Ever is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 06:26 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bohica's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 281
Default

I hate to pile on, but I certainly couldn't have said that nearly as well as MemFO.

Those are my fears exactly, and unfortunately the horse has left the barn. Time will tell how bad it is for those of us waiting for our turn at the golden ring.
Bohica is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 06:29 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by fdxflyer
I am anti-change. I will always say that I can't believe enough people took the biggest perk of this job and lobbied to have it tossed out.

BUT - everyone on the list here at Fedex and I guess everywhere else needs to keep some perspective.
I've suspected from the start that this REALLY BIG "age 65" legislation was being "driven" by the legacy guys that have lost their pensions and MUST keep working past age 60 in order to support their families. Ask my 58 year old UAL A320 Captain neighbor!

I've been in their shoes. Fortunately, for me, I was young and able to start my career over at FedEx. This legislation will hurt my seniority for the rest of my career. I'm grateful I'm not in their shoes ... We could be in a MUCH worse position (very much worser?) than just whining about slowed career progression.

I'm mildly amused (no not gloating) that when my legacy carrier went T.U. that those same legacy guys weren't the least bit interested in helping us. What? You want us to consider a national ALPA date-of-hire seniority list!

All that said, I will never understand the 60 year old widebody FedEx Captain that has the opportunity to retire at age 60 (will a generous full retirement) and just wants to keep working? They must have a very sad home life.

Go ahead JJ ... flame away.


Mark
MaydayMark is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices