Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Age 65 here we go...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2007, 07:25 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by hook
how's ths one:

Over 60 CAPT: Um I'm a bit tired, just gonna shut my eyes a bit if that ok with you.

Under 60 FO (aka required babysitter of over 60 guy): yeah - you do that you old %^&*(so i can pull out my video camera and stick the whole thing on you tube).

dont let these guys sleep - keep 'em awake all night...let them burn out as quick as possible.
Awesome!..... just Awesome.
Deez340 is offline  
Old 12-13-2007, 08:22 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheBaron's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by Normy!
It is obvious that pilots need to retire from active flying at part 121 airlines at the age of 60. The majority of the people that I've known over the years have been WAY wacky-the vast majority have been unable for an FAA medical, even if they didn't want one.

But several +60 people that I've flown with were REALLY REALLY gone not just in a physical sense, but in a mental situation. I had one guy start to preach to me in my hotel room after we flew to Hong Kong. He had his bible out and everything- he kept quoting his CRAP to me until I finally shut the DOOR on him. I refused to fly with him, but he was one of the people that wanted to be a Captain again!

Listen: I'd work with the guy. But the first time the religion reared its' ugly head...I'd walk out the door. That includes half-way across the Atlantic. This bastard could land the airplane by himself, as far as I was concerned!

I suspect that +60 people are a MESS. A few will test normal, but the vast majority really aren't fit to work at Taco Bell. Why are they considered for flying duty at Fedex and a few others?
Exactly what do bible thumping and age 60 have to do with each other? With that kind of logic, maybe the +60 crowd aren't the ones that are a mess.
TheBaron is offline  
Old 12-13-2007, 08:49 PM
  #83  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default H.R. 4343, the "Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act,"

I like the name - NOT


Does this mean if I was hired at 55 and don't have any experience yet - I still have to retire at age 60??


When they pin on a name like that you know the whole thing is just politics. The longer we work at our normal payrate the longer the IRS (Federal Government) gets to collect higher taxes from us!!!
MaxKts is offline  
Old 12-13-2007, 08:58 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MrSuupafly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 178
Default

Originally Posted by hook
how's ths one:

Over 60 CAPT: Um I'm a bit tired, just gonna shut my eyes a bit if that ok with you.

Under 60 FO (aka required babysitter of over 60 guy): yeah - you do that you old %^&*(so i can pull out my video camera and stick the whole thing on you tube).

dont let these guys sleep - keep 'em awake all night...let them burn out as quick as possible.
Man, I can't stop laughing.
MrSuupafly is offline  
Old 12-14-2007, 03:09 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tigerpilot1995's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SDF A300 FO
Posts: 441
Default

I saw a pilot the other day getting off the crew bus. This was the most painful person I have witnessed in a long time. It took them 4 trips on and off the bus to get 3 bags off. They had an expression on their face as if we just landing on mars for the first time. This person was nowhere near 60 yrs old.

I see guys way under 60 who are so fat that I almost smile when I see them because I am sure they are senior to me.

I flew with a Rope a few weeks ago that could do physical and mental laps around me any day of the year.

The lesson, everyone ages differently. I feel there needs to be a true test, physical and mental, to determine if we are safe to fly.
Tigerpilot1995 is offline  
Old 12-14-2007, 10:32 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by A300_Driver
If you really think that it was because of our union that this thing passed both Houses of Congress Unanimously I've got a great stock pick that I'll sell to you...
Most of us are peeved about this, but it's time to get over the FDX ALPA bashing--the company loves this and it really is getting OLD!
If you do not believe that Dave Webb went against the majority of the crewforce to get this added, I would be the one interested in selling you a bridge. Yes, I am mad at ALPA and especially at our MEC and they deserve it. I could care less if the company likes it or not. Hope Albie and Vic can start to change things.
From HR 4343, you can thank our union for these words:

`(e) Applicability-
  • `(1) NONRETROACTIVITY- No person who has attained 60 years of age before the date of enactment of this section may serve as a pilot for an air carrier engaged in covered operations unless--
    • `(A) such person is in the employment of that air carrier in such operations on such date of enactment as a required flight deck crew member; or
      `(B) such person is newly hired by an air carrier as a pilot on or after such date of enactment without credit for prior seniority or prior longevity for benefits or other terms related to length of service prior to the date of rehire under any labor agreement or employment policies of the air carrier.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 12-14-2007, 11:33 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,535
Default

Originally Posted by HIFLYR
If you do not believe that Dave Webb went against the majority of the crewforce to get this added,
I think what he is saying is that there is much more to this than a relatively small union and even smaller MEC. How much influence do you really think ALPA has in Washington? Money talks and we don't have it. How many of those that are complaining about the political process have contributed to the ALPA PAC in the last five years? How do you think those dollars compared to AARP and other supporters of this legislation?

The reason ALPA is pleased with the included language is that language specifically excludes the over 60 guys who already retired. Without that they could've come back.

Furthermore, if we come up with subsets of seniority, we are going to be screwed for much longer than 5 years. How did the A and B scales work out in the 80's and 90's?

The point is ALPA didn't do this and couldn't stop this. ICAO started this a couple of years ago and we sat by, stuck our heads in the sand and said it won't happen here and then act surprised that it came to pass.
MX727 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
Freighter Captain
Hangar Talk
1
09-08-2005 11:44 AM
Diesel 10
Hangar Talk
4
07-20-2005 05:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices