Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

New ACP's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2007, 08:21 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: A300 CAP FDX
Posts: 287
Default

Originally Posted by Ranger
Scenario: A three (wo)man crew has their collective heads up and locked. They do something stupid or make an honest mistake. They get the call to have a visit with their ACP. The captain has a last name that starts with A, the f/o's starts with L and the rfo/engineer's starts with Z. The captain's ACP fires him, the f/o gets 2 weeks of without pay and the rfo/engineer gets a slap on the wrist and buys his ACP a cup of coffee because they flew together someplace years ago.

What a plan.
If there's a fireable type offense pending, I don't think the decision to give a guy his walking papers is made at the mid-level ACP position. SCP, lawyers, and personnel get involved. So the guy handing out the discipline is just a hatchet man. Apologies to fecav8r, but: makes me wonder why anyone would want to be the remote controlled bearer of bad news.

In the end, the place needs a manager interface. I, for one, am GLAD that at least we have a pilot, vice a suit, doing the job. As for the cross-qualified ACP (727 qual-ed ACP reviewing an A300 Captain): if the call on the carpet was aircraft specific, standards has enough input with the enhanced oversight program to address this. I could care less if my ACP is qual-ed on my A/C. Sure, it might take a couple of minutes to explain how things came about. Org diagrams, and reporting funcions aren't my thing, I'm a line dog. When they decide to put a non-pilot suit in the ACP job (call it what you will), THEN I'll worry.
a300fr8dog is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 08:40 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 398
Default

And of course they all called the union FIRST before showing up for that ACP meeting, right? And brought their own union representative with them? That would help with "equal" discipline.

If you have to go see an ACP for a "stupid or honest mistake," call the union. It is not confrontational or anti-management to do this. It is to protect yourself, and have someone on your side that can see the situation objectively. Most management guys are in the union, anyway, and will support you bringing a rep. It is your right.
Fedex999999 is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 11:33 AM
  #23  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default

When I upgraded from right to left seat in the Mad Dog we did a series of events involving Subic. Our instructor had never been there................
FLMD11CAPT is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 11:58 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Deuce130's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 931
Default

Originally Posted by FLMD11CAPT
When I upgraded from right to left seat in the Mad Dog we did a series of events involving Subic. Our instructor had never been there................
While I agree that sometimes "having been there, done that..." is important, I don't think training scenarios or simulator admin is one of them. Most guys have never had a V1 cut either, doesn't mean they can't teach it in the sim. If a guy can get across the knowledge you need to know, then he's done his job.

I can understand the chagrin about having long time training guys fill the management positions, as something about it doesn't quite "feel right." It'd be nice to see an outsider type get involved, if in fact there are any that actually want to. In the meanwhile, though, nearly all of the training guys I've met have been good dudes who have our best interests in mind and who also KNOW they've got to fight a little bit harder for that street cred they need. I really don't think we'll notice one hiccup or speed bump in the road with these guys in charge.
Deuce130 is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 01:54 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

I like the new system, as a matter of fact since senority has nothing to do with the way our block reps vote, maybe we should switch to the alphabet for determining what block we are in.

Now that I think about, since the union just seems to be a rubber stamp, maybe our ACPs can double as block reps.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 02:03 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Check 6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 777
Posts: 866
Default

Can I still change my vote for this ACP thingy?
Check 6 is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 02:45 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 96
Default

I am sure that Captains wont mind having discipline handed out by an ACP that is an FO.
rolling thunder is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 03:03 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
subicpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: A300CAP
Posts: 479
Default

I would submit that if they do, it's THEIR problem...
subicpilot is offline  
Old 12-01-2007, 03:03 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Default

Originally Posted by rolling thunder
I am sure that Captains wont mind having discipline handed out by an ACP that is an FO.
Yeah but he probably would be trained/qualed as one from being a flex so it is ok.
USMCFDX is offline  
Old 12-02-2007, 05:32 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MEMA300's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Excessed WB Capt.
Posts: 1,084
Default

Originally Posted by rolling thunder
I am sure that Captains wont mind having discipline handed out by an ACP that is an FO.
Why do we have ACPs that are not checked out as Capt. Don't all have the seniority to be Capt.
MEMA300 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices