Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
So, do you still think cargo will be going unmanned in the near future? >

So, do you still think cargo will be going unmanned in the near future?

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

So, do you still think cargo will be going unmanned in the near future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2007, 06:03 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoosePileit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: The IPA EB speaks for me
Posts: 530
Default

Everybody is used to both depending on pilots' personalities in execution of a flight/sortie/mission AND being easy to blame or hold responsible. The latter will the tougher of the two to replace....
MoosePileit is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 07:05 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Radial Song's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: DC-10 FO
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld
Trains haul thousands of tons more than an airplane can. Having a human button pusher on board is not that much of an expense. Conversely, removing the train driver does not save that much. Removing the life support systems and the pilots from an Md-11, 747, A-380 would cause considerable cost savings to the operators. The military is leading the way as many would be U-2 pilots are assigned to Global Hawk and Predator.

It is expensive to pay a pilot $300-400k to fly an airplane (as FDX and UPS do in some cases). If/when the technology comes, the cargo companies will be the first to use it. Don't get me wrong. I dearly hope to be one of those UPS captains making that much some day. It's only due to unions that we enjoy the pay we have now. Eventually the technology will enable the elimination of us and the union busting management at Brown will lead the way. That's why I give us 20 years left to enjoy what we have.
Your point is taken on the trains. As an opposite to your analogy to trains, the crew costs for container ships and tankers are much more than airplanes. Granted, the tonnage to crew cost ratio is better. Even with this in mind, I think there will be unmanned cargo ships before unmanned cargo aircraft on any appreciable scale.

Maybe the selfish part of me is just in denial because I have 20 to 25 years left.

Last edited by Radial Song; 10-19-2007 at 06:04 AM.
Radial Song is offline  
Old 10-18-2007, 08:21 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Spartan07's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: C152
Posts: 501
Default

Sorry to butt in here but somebody mentioned that they will do away with the $100-$200k yearly costs per pilot with an automated system. This entire system would be completely and totally dependent on computer engineers that could build and maintain a near perfect computer. Last I checked computer engineers at that level of expertise are a heck of a lot more expensive than gear swinging monkeys. And I really don't think they will ever launch an aircraft completely and totally without supervision, so the man behind the computer monitoring the aircraft will have to get paid too.
Spartan07 is offline  
Old 10-19-2007, 07:34 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MoosePileit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: The IPA EB speaks for me
Posts: 530
Default

Spartan has a good point- IF a person is ever to fly in/monitor or ferry a UAV, there will have to be most of the weight of life support systems on board. Same for any live cargo. Weight savings won't be on par w/ unmanned combat/UCAVs or Recon UAVs. Also, the stat for China exports is somewhere in the 2-4% of the bulk of exports travel by air- BUT- they make up over 80% of the value of exports. Not a quote, but close. As long as we are hauling the precious cargo, the paycheck we receive should be small in comparison, especially vs. the boats and their crews.

Not saying it can't happen- but chasing the almighty dollar, if pilots can keep their scope intact over the years, there should be little external pressure for a UAV carrying cargo.

Last edited by MoosePileit; 10-19-2007 at 07:35 AM. Reason: typo
MoosePileit is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 12:57 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Trapav8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by 1800 RVR
The Federal Aviation Administration has issued 55 special permits this year to fly drones in civilian areas. They include everything from long-range planes with a wingspan the size of a Boeing 737 to craft the size and weight of a small kite.

Is there a way to get a copy of these permits and who requested them? I wonder if the fleet of 727's that FedEx is retiring will have a future in unmanned flight experimentation and certification.
Trapav8r is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 01:53 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Clue32's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 876
Default

I have a Hunter UAV company in my organization. To call them unmanned is a bit off base as we have two people operating them at all times. The difference being that our pilot are sitting in a shelter on the back of a HMMWV (Hummer for those civilian folks out there) on the ground. Unoccupied Air Vehicle is more accurate.

There is a considerable foot print on the ground to fly each UAV and I do not see the cost benefit in taking the pilots and equipment out of the aircraft and putting it on the ground.

Furthermore, there has to be some sort of data link between the Ground and the Aircraft. If that is line of sight then the aircraft can't go to far away from home station. If you want to rely on satellite technology to have global reach then you'll have to invest Billions of dollars in launching new satellites in order to have the band width available to control thousands of UAV's at the same time. Then each company is going to have to pay for that band width.

Finally, you have to convince John and Jane Doe to get themselves or thier precious cargo aboard an aircraft that has no pilot monitoring the computers onboard.

I don't see this happening in my lifetime, or even my children’s lifetime.

Last edited by Clue32; 10-21-2007 at 04:47 AM.
Clue32 is offline  
Old 10-21-2007, 04:46 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

The technological side of unmanned flight aside, the commercial airline industry is, to a large degree, "customer driven". By that I mean it's the people riding these jets who will make the decision to fly on an unmanned flight. If these folk decide they actually want to see two pilots working up front, then I can't believe that unmanned flight will catch on. As well, imagine the startup cost of such a venture. Imagine this: it's 2027 (20 years from now) and American Airlines (or any other airline of your choice) is rolling out it's first unmanned Boeing 977. Big fanfare. Lots of press in the NY Times and USA Today (the only two newspapers left, as all other papers have gone "electronic".) The inaugural flight from JFK to LHR departs on time, but never makes it to London. Now I ask you, are you going to allow your grandkids to come visit you, on one of these unmanned jets? Do you think any businessmen will be lining up to fly on one? Remember, the vast majority of other airlines have still not gone "unmanned." What would be your choice? - Manned or unmanned? I know what I'd choose. It will only take one accident and that would be the end of unmanned flight, IMHO.
Jetjok is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KnightFlyer
Cargo
49
10-11-2007 01:14 PM
flyinboxes
Cargo
24
10-10-2007 05:52 AM
nightrider
Cargo
23
09-27-2007 05:26 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
1
05-21-2006 09:27 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 09:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices