Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Here's the new UPS bid >

Here's the new UPS bid

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Here's the new UPS bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2007, 04:36 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by bifff15
2. If you get displaced on probation is it a paid move? I probably know, but I have to ask anyway.
Thanks in advance!
It is going to be even worse for some guys than they can even imagine. The next time that you go through training, you will not be getting per diem or a hotel room unless you are coming from MIA or ONT. It's on your own dime this go around. Not only that, but we have 2 more rounds of this coming along. The last time we went through this it was NOTHING to see a guy go through three seperate seat moves and the subsequent training events. All this on 28,000 a year

Last edited by 767pilot; 10-07-2007 at 04:54 PM.
767pilot is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 04:54 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tigerpilot1995's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SDF A300 FO
Posts: 441
Default

Thank goodness the guys that run the airline don't run UPS. We wouldn't be making 3.9B for sure.
Tigerpilot1995 is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 04:56 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
What airplane are we talking about? My buddy who's on the DC8 panel says they use him pretty much every week he's on reserve ...and have been since he got hired. He's been here for year and a half...

A guy was telling me last night (so you know it must be true) that many of the over 60 guys have a peculiar work ethic and that the company often has to go through 5 or 6 of them on reserve call outs before they find one that is not "sick" and will come out to fly. I hope that isn't the case.
767pilot is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 05:09 PM
  #44  
Gets all holidays off
 
fr8rcaptain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: Retired UPS 767 Captain, SDF Z
Posts: 431
Default

Originally Posted by GoddardRocket
What do you guys think will be the status of us DC-8 engineers who have gotten off probation the last couple of months but not had the opportunity to bid an FO seat yet? Are we considered displacees, or do we only get to upgrade if we take the positions offered (ie 747 ANC)? The chief pilot message said "16 current DC-8 second officers will eligible for upgrade to remaining positions systemwide". Does that sound like those of us off probation will have displacement rights over the +/-100 FOs that have been hired to SDF after us?
If you're off probation, you can bid ANTHING your seniority number can hold. I'm guessing that the junior DC8 wrenches don't have the seniority to go sit sideways on the whale, so you'd have to upgrade to an FO position.

Are any of the 16 mentioned Dc8 FEs still on probation? If that's true, then that statement just means the co. will allow probies on the 8 panel to bid FO positions.
fr8rcaptain is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 05:46 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot
A guy was telling me last night (so you know it must be true) that many of the over 60 guys have a peculiar work ethic and that the company often has to go through 5 or 6 of them on reserve call outs before they find one that is not "sick" and will come out to fly. I hope that isn't the case.
I don't know if that's the case or not. However, the guys in our class who got the panel seat were told by more senior pilots in our class "well, at least you won't be flying as much, enjoy your time at home while you can."

Apparently, it’s not true at all, at least on the DC8. From what I was told by the 4 guys in our class who ended up on the panel – all of them are flying pretty much every week. They're not complaining; just making a point that the rumor of "sitting home while on reserve as a flight engineer” definitely does not apply to them...
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 10-07-2007, 06:53 PM
  #46  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default They both did ,,,

Originally Posted by FliFast
Yeah and buy lots of Immodium AD, the seafood platter on the plane gave my lower digestive tract a re-enactment of the Battle of 1812.

Gives new meaning to the question, "Did any one of the pilots have fish ?"

FF

That REALLY is more INFO than we need to know ... BROWN FliFast !
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 05:55 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,144
Default

Originally Posted by Tigerpilot1995
Thank goodness the guys that run the airline don't run UPS. We wouldn't be making 3.9B for sure.

That's the problem, the people who run the airline are the ones running UPS. The airline folks can't take a crap without permission from ATL. I would say if the airline could run itself, they could make 7B a year.
UPSFO4LIFE is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 06:23 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,701
Default

Originally Posted by ImTumbleweed
767Pilot,

Your post mentioned "no additional new hires required". Does that mean "no hiring" for a while at UPS or does it mean no new hires required to fill the seats of the bid (and hiring continues).
I'm hardly the voice of authority on this, but it seems to be the case. We have two things going on, an inability to train MD-11 pilots which is what we need, and a dictum from HQ to cut $200,000,000 from the operations budget. They've done this before, and it has been painful, but we have always made it through
767pilot is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:17 PM
  #49  
Tri-tanic operator
 
CactusCrew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Doggie
Posts: 2,382
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot
I'm hardly the voice of authority on this, but it seems to be the case. We have two things going on, an inability to train MD-11 pilots which is what we need, and a dictum from HQ to cut $200,000,000 from the operations budget. They've done this before, and it has been painful, but we have always made it through

Call me crazy, but at 33K a year plus benefits and training ... hiring/not hiring pilots is not going to break the piggy bank ... hope they figure that one out.

Maybe its time to cut back line hiring, and hire more managers ... double the production.


Last edited by CactusCrew; 10-08-2007 at 07:17 PM. Reason: typo
CactusCrew is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:35 PM
  #50  
New ride...
 
1800 RVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by CactusCrew

Maybe its time to cut back line hiring, and hire more managers ... double the production.

Don't give them any more ideas!
1800 RVR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cujo
Cargo
4
10-01-2007 10:08 PM
767pilot
Cargo
53
09-28-2007 05:50 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-11-2005 08:59 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-05-2005 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices