FCIF on LOA
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,535
The old 310 sim will be down for MX to fix the visual. The new 310 sim isn't up yet and I believe they are hedging their bets by getting as much done in case the new sim doesn't come online as scheduled.
#25
#27
#28
A=B, B=C, then A=C: I bet that more people read that FCIF than there are people reading these threads! Also bet that there are more people planning on voting yes now than no.
Where's our union in helping getting the word out regarding what is better for the pilot group? Oh, no wait, they're counting votes...
Where's our union in helping getting the word out regarding what is better for the pilot group? Oh, no wait, they're counting votes...
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Where did I say cassel = MEC. I implied that all the information should have been readily available before now or my highly informed MEC would not have bothered to vote on this LOA. Do you think the number from PW are important before you vote on this LOA? I do. I would have expected the same from a MEC member. Sarcasim in green.
Your post seemed to imply some connection between Cassel finally addressing the LOA from the company standpoint and info the MEC had. That's what I was questioning. It was really unclear.
And actually, based on previous experience with tax equalization, and the restrictions on accounting firms in the post-Enron business world, no, I don't need to see the numbers. Tax equalization is one of the few good parts of this LOA.
And one more time, just for those who missed the three or four other times I stated this, the LOA is inadequate, and I'm voting NO.
Last edited by fdx727pilot; 07-07-2007 at 06:14 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post