Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FCIF on LOA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2007, 07:08 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: C
Posts: 35
Default Voting No

I’m voting No -seniority number under 1000
Buzzard is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 07:18 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,535
Default

Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver
From FCIF

Sounds like the company is expecting alot of airbus training in SEPT that is currently not assigned. Speculate........
The old 310 sim will be down for MX to fix the visual. The new 310 sim isn't up yet and I believe they are hedging their bets by getting as much done in case the new sim doesn't come online as scheduled.
MX727 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:11 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Haywood JB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: Who knows...waiting for a bid
Posts: 379
Default

I think another hold up on the sim is the approval of the EFB and where they are going to put it. The new sim is supposed to have it.

HJ
Haywood JB is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:54 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

I noticed the FCIF said keep the questions coming. But I didn't see an avenue. Should I E Mail my questions directly to PC or do you think a phone call is appropriate?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 08:57 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
I noticed the FCIF said keep the questions coming. But I didn't see an avenue. Should I E Mail my questions directly to PC or do you think a phone call is appropriate?

Both, of course. Don't forget a comail.
Gunter is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 02:09 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigWatchPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Bench Warmer
Posts: 241
Default

I have one thing to say to FedEx and the MEC….VOTE NO!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
ssh-torf_large.jpg (33.3 KB, 158 views)
BigWatchPilot is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 03:37 PM
  #27  
gets every day off
 
Nitefrater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Retired MD11 Capt
Posts: 705
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
I noticed the FCIF said keep the questions coming. But I didn't see an avenue. Should I E Mail my questions directly to PC or do you think a phone call is appropriate?
Check with Sean... the "Open Letter to the CEO" strategy usually gets their attention.
Nitefrater is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 04:06 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
magic rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 909
Default

A=B, B=C, then A=C: I bet that more people read that FCIF than there are people reading these threads! Also bet that there are more people planning on voting yes now than no.

Where's our union in helping getting the word out regarding what is better for the pilot group? Oh, no wait, they're counting votes...
magic rat is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 04:20 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

Sometimes I wonder if company=union union =company pilots=shiit sandwich

sad state of affairs....
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 05:05 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Where did I say cassel = MEC. I implied that all the information should have been readily available before now or my highly informed MEC would not have bothered to vote on this LOA. Do you think the number from PW are important before you vote on this LOA? I do. I would have expected the same from a MEC member. Sarcasim in green.

Your post seemed to imply some connection between Cassel finally addressing the LOA from the company standpoint and info the MEC had. That's what I was questioning. It was really unclear.

And actually, based on previous experience with tax equalization, and the restrictions on accounting firms in the post-Enron business world, no, I don't need to see the numbers. Tax equalization is one of the few good parts of this LOA.

And one more time, just for those who missed the three or four other times I stated this, the LOA is inadequate, and I'm voting NO.

Last edited by fdx727pilot; 07-07-2007 at 06:14 PM.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8torguy
Cargo
124
07-25-2007 11:12 PM
prezbear
Cargo
32
07-07-2007 05:01 PM
Flycast
Cargo
24
07-07-2007 01:13 AM
Was that for me
Cargo
9
07-05-2007 01:26 PM
TonyM
Cargo
5
07-04-2007 08:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices