Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX'ers on LOA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2007, 06:54 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: unskilled laborer
Posts: 353
Default

Originally Posted by Jake Speed
RUMOR HAS IT: The Bid is already in the hands of the union. It's either the LOA or nothing/zilch/notta. The company has "specified" what they intend to do. Hence the union rhetoric. I'm against the LOA but this is from a GOOD, albeit GREAT, source, FWIW. Still a capital NO for me....
This is the kind of BS I can't stand.

Assuming it is even true --- The Union has NO business leaking info like this before a vote if they are not willing to provide complete details. For the money we pay, the customer service sucks!

By the way, SVT or STV is terrible. It is a good enough cause for a NO vote, and I will vote NO, but there are many other reasons to vote no as well. I would hate to see this thing come back without svt and hear everybody say "well, the money and details are lacking, but at least no svt." It is woefully short in dollars, benefits, specifics, etc!! There should be no question that this will fail.
fdxflyer is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 06:54 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11
Posts: 315
Thumbs up

What he said!
BonesF15 is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:02 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Jake Speed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 84
Default

Don't shoot the messenger.... IMHO, they're a bunch of pushovers at Kirby who refuse to "Fight" for anything.... They'll accept what's given as long as it's better than status quo, ie CBA, and when/if pushed, will settle to enable or retain (Which is a pipe dream) a "positive working relationship with management"
Jake Speed is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:05 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: unskilled laborer
Posts: 353
Default

sorry if it sounded like I was aiming at you!
fdxflyer is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:08 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Jake Speed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 84
Default

no harm, no foul....
Jake Speed is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:14 PM
  #26  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Albief15

As Check 6 pointed out, the company CAN use ANY plane in the FDA they see fit.


CBA, 30 October 2006

SECTION 2

DEFINITIONS


41. FOREIGN DUTY ASSIGNMENT
An assignment of a pilot to a base outside the United States, or
its territories, designated by the Company, for greater than 3 bid
periods. A pilot holding an FDA shall be permanently domiciled in
MEM.

11. BASE
An aircraft specific operational work location (FDA, temporary
vacancy or domicile).





.
TonyC is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:23 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 503
Default

Thanks for returning from the dead! I'm not sure whether or not you have been told not to post your opinions or not, but posting facts is always welcome. However, based upon the latest MD11 FO ANC slide to MEM without passover, I don't think we can use the definitions for a point of reference to how things will actually be done.
kwri10s is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:25 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
boxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 211
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
CBA, 30 October 2006

SECTION 2

DEFINITIONS


41. FOREIGN DUTY ASSIGNMENT
An assignment of a pilot to a base outside the United States, or
its territories, designated by the Company, for greater than 3 bid
periods. A pilot holding an FDA shall be permanently domiciled in
MEM.

11. BASE
An aircraft specific operational work location (FDA, temporary
vacancy or domicile).





.
sorry tony, i dont understand what you are referencing. The company can staff either FDA with any airplane, Right? I wish you you could talk plainly on this forum like you used to before your election. Guys have lots of questions I'm not finding much useful union info.
boxhauler is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:26 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: FedEx
Posts: 666
Default

Originally Posted by Jake Speed
Don't shoot the messenger.... IMHO, they're a bunch of pushovers at Kirby who refuse to "Fight" for anything.... They'll accept what's given as long as it's better than status quo, ie CBA, and when/if pushed, will settle to enable or retain (Which is a pipe dream) a "positive working relationship with management"

Problem is, this LOA would not be better than status quo. I'd much prefer guys to willingly go to a FDA with no COLA than for me to get inversed because not enough would go over for $3K per month.

Vote NO!

FJ
Falconjet is offline  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:31 PM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 26
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
CBA, 30 October 2006

SECTION 2

DEFINITIONS


41. FOREIGN DUTY ASSIGNMENT
An assignment of a pilot to a base outside the United States, or
its territories, designated by the Company, for greater than 3 bid
periods. A pilot holding an FDA shall be permanently domiciled in
MEM.

11. BASE
An aircraft specific operational work location (FDA, temporary
vacancy or domicile).





.
Are you seriously implying that the above definitions prevent the company from opening both an Airbus and MD FDA in HK? Please, I was born at night...but not last night.

Imagine that scenario. For years the company can STV crews(three months at a time) for both airplanes to HKG. All those DHs to and from Asia--Gone! There's no need for them since guys are living over there for three months at a time.

Does 41 above mean that in order to STV an SFS/ANC/LAX crew the company has to re-domicile them to MEM? What are the implications to that?
TonyM is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
av8torguy
Cargo
124
07-25-2007 11:12 PM
prezbear
Cargo
32
07-07-2007 05:01 PM
Flycast
Cargo
24
07-07-2007 01:13 AM
TonyM
Cargo
5
07-04-2007 08:39 PM
prezbear
Cargo
7
07-03-2007 09:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices