Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Alpa Fdx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2007, 05:35 AM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: A300 Captain
Posts: 257
Default

Originally Posted by Huck
RSO

Keep them in the right seat only!!!!

The only option that spreads the wealth beyond those chosen few who will get 5 more years of widebody captain pay.....
Unfortunately they would end up buddy bidding with over 60 guys and get bumped off thus being a good deal for them and ****ing me off even more
Bitme is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 07:15 AM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
130JDrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis
If the company wants to avoid paying passover pay to the over 60 crowd, just have a big bid 2 weeks prior to the effective date of the change. Say for instance, with a two year training cycle. Even if they are allowed to bid back, they will have to wait for a vacancy bid. Also, if there is an excess bid soon, that will mean that every DC-10 S/O is over 60 and letting all of them come limping back all at once would pretty much ground that dwindling fleet. Something that ain't goonna happen in a short time.
Don't hink it would work that way. They do not have to have a bid to start school in the back seat due to regulatory issues. I'm sure that if the rule changes they will be put in training at some point without a bid.

Past.....
130JDrvr is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 07:51 AM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by 130JDrvr
Don't hink it would work that way. They do not have to have a bid to start school in the back seat due to regulatory issues. I'm sure that if the rule changes they will be put in training at some point without a bid.

Past.....
But according to the contract, there would have to be a vacancy bid in order for them (the over 60 diaper wearing crowd) to bid what their seniority could hold. If there wasn't a bid for 2 years most of them would just retire instead of pouring coffee.


Mark
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 07:57 AM
  #164  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by 130JDrvr
Don't hink it would work that way. They do not have to have a bid to start school in the back seat due to regulatory issues. I'm sure that if the rule changes they will be put in training at some point without a bid.

Past.....
Really, so if you can hold widebody captain and you are any age, you can go to training without a bid and subvert the sacred seniority system? I'll bet even Foxhuter would agree that they will have to "bid what they want to fly" and then be trained in seniority order. Remember, if/when this thing changes, they are just part of the seniority list, no different, no special favors. If Big Wave Dave Webb wants to "request to return to the line" in an expedious manner, all he has to do is to start stacking his over 60 buddies on top of the line holders without a bid. Any recall effort would gain traction, including my support.
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 08:43 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Huck
RSO

Keep them in the right seat only!!!!

The only option that spreads the wealth beyond those chosen few who will get 5 more years of widebody captain pay.....

Our only hope is for legislation to keep the over 60 guys from getting back up front. We won't be able to keep them from CA if they are allowed to go back up front.
Gunter is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 09:53 AM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
130JDrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis
Really, so if you can hold widebody captain and you are any age, you can go to training without a bid and subvert the sacred seniority system? I'll bet even Foxhuter would agree that they will have to "bid what they want to fly" and then be trained in seniority order. Remember, if/when this thing changes, they are just part of the seniority list, no different, no special favors. If Big Wave Dave Webb wants to "request to return to the line" in an expedious manner, all he has to do is to start stacking his over 60 buddies on top of the line holders without a bid. Any recall effort would gain traction, including my support.
My point being, they do not have to have a bid before they are sent to the back seat. If the regulation changes they may may not have to have a bid to go back to the front seat due to the regulatory change. Not sure how it will play out.
Will be interesting to watch...

Don't think it will be Dave's call on how they are trained.


Past...
130JDrvr is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 10:29 AM
  #167  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by 130JDrvr
If the regulation changes they may may not have to have a bid to go back to the front seat due to the regulatory change. Not sure how it will play out.
Will be interesting to watch...
I think the difference is that they are "forced" to be a SO due to the regs, but a regulatory change to allow front seats up to age 65 will not automatically "force" an over 60 SO out of his seat. He can legally still be able to sit sideways until he can bid out of that seat!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 10:42 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis
Really, so if you can hold widebody captain and you are any age, you can go to training without a bid and subvert the sacred seniority system? I'll bet even Foxhuter would agree that they will have to "bid what they want to fly" and then be trained in seniority order. Remember, if/when this thing changes, they are just part of the seniority list, no different, no special favors. If Big Wave Dave Webb wants to "request to return to the line" in an expedious manner, all he has to do is to start stacking his over 60 buddies on top of the line holders without a bid. Any recall effort would gain traction, including my support.
You lose the bet! When a managment pilot, LCA, Flex, LOA, MLOA, regained medical individual return they can bump into any position their sysem seniority can hold. While it is not really addressed in the contract it has been an accepted past practice.

There is also the possibility that the change will happen before this next bid. It looks like perfect timing for the company since an excess on the DC10 is coming in the near future they can fill a large number of Captain slots with the excess S/Os that want to return to the Captain seat. The company has one training cycle for each Captain/FO position filled in this manner verse the the multi training cycles generated by the domino effect of filling one Captain slot in more normal times. There is also nothing that I see that says that the company cannot award the Captain slot to any over age 60 S/O until the rule changes. The company just cannot use them in revenue service until the change is in effect. All training up to IOE could be done prior to the change.

In any case I see management sitting back and watching FDX ALPA falling apart from within with a certain sense of amusement.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 10:54 AM
  #169  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

............................

Last edited by FXDX; 05-07-2007 at 10:55 AM. Reason: Nevermind
FXDX is offline  
Old 05-07-2007, 10:58 AM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis
Also, if there is an excess bid soon, that will mean that every DC-10 S/O is over 60 and letting all of them come limping back all at once would pretty much ground that dwindling fleet. Something that ain't goonna happen in a short time.
Except that good chunk of DC10 SOs are already 65 or older.

Last edited by fdx727pilot; 05-07-2007 at 11:08 AM.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rjlavender
Major
26
10-19-2006 08:48 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM
Diesel 10
Hangar Talk
4
07-20-2005 05:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices