Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS App. open today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2007, 03:50 PM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
MayFly135s's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B747 FO
Posts: 61
Default

I'm also a previous 2007 applicant for "SECOND OFFICER" that is unable to submit a new 2007 "FIRST OFFICER" application or make updates.

Has anyone had success with getting buddies to walk in a new cover letter and updated resume? Since I am leaving the AF in a month I need to get the HR folks a new address...
MayFly135s is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 03:53 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waborita's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 109% IPA
Posts: 159
Question

The million dollar question is WHY does UPS hire this way? Have they had any incidents or accidents with new F/O's without prior heavy int'l experience? Or high failure rates in the training on the MD11, A300, 747?

Does FEDEX assign class dates this way?

I know CAL hires right into the 777 and 757-767 and they don't seperate domestic and int'l seniority lists like UPS does. So they could have a 1 year RJ F/O who was an intern at CAL with 1500 tt flying the 777 int'l and it seems to work well there!

Any feed back would be appreciated.
Waborita is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:06 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
exp96's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 294
Default

Originally Posted by Waborita
The million dollar question is WHY does UPS hire this way? Have they had any incidents or accidents with new F/O's without prior heavy int'l experience? Or high failure rates in the training on the MD11, A300, 747?

Does FEDEX assign class dates this way?

I know CAL hires right into the 777 and 757-767 and they don't seperate domestic and int'l seniority lists like UPS does. So they could have a 1 year RJ F/O who was an intern at CAL with 1500 tt flying the 777 int'l and it seems to work well there!

Any feed back would be appreciated.
You might want to check your sources. UPS has one seniority list.
exp96 is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:10 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Waborita's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 109% IPA
Posts: 159
Default

Originally Posted by exp96
You might want to check your sources. UPS has one seniority list.

What I meant was A/C seniority lists. For example a 757-767 ,777, or 737 pilot at CAL will fly domestic and int'l there is no seperation of domestic vs intl. like at UPS.
Waborita is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:18 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by Don Q
Ditto here brother. I gave four years of my life to UPS when I was in college, it's clearly stated in my resume, in my two prior applications, it has taken me 13 years of my life to be able to apply, and now they come up with those requirements. WOW!
I called one of my UPS contacts (a fighter guy) and he told me,"at UPS they want the abuse of the employees to start early in the employment process."
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:41 PM
  #56  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: B744 F/O
Posts: 4
Question PIC v.s. Int'l widebody

I've heard rumors that people with MD-11 time are sought after by UPS. I've been on the MD-11 for 6 years as an F/O / IRO and am typed in it (maybe 2500 hours or so) and, needless to say, have *lots* of ocean crossings, including currently regularly flying many of the routes UPS is flying in the -11 out of ANC. However, when I got this job, I didn't have 1,000 hours of PIC (jet / turboprop) and I'm not getting any right now. Because of that, the online app says I'm not qualified (technically true).

I'm probably one of a *very* few people with that unusual set of qualifications. I wonder, does UPS know it's excluding people like me, and do they intend to do that? If they really don't want me due to the lack of PIC time, that's perfectly fine, but I wonder if there's any way I could present that to someone in the hiring department to see if they'd be interested in at least interviewing me? Somoene have an address I can mail a letter to? I couldn't find one on the website and I'm certain that's intentional Maybe someone from UPS would have some insight???

V-
varrin is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:08 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thestableone's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 108
Default

Here's my FWIW on the online app. - - Looks like you can edit all you want to - - unless you completly fill in all the areas. As soon as you fill in the last box on the last page it seems to just boot you out. If you filled it all in and try to go back into the edit place it says "your app doesn't need any attention". So you better fill everything in right the first time.
thestableone is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:19 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
viktorbravo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Capt: Lav Truck
Posts: 288
Default

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
I love it. I have 3700 fighter hours, Instructor/Evaluator, flown international all over Europe, Middle East and Asia. I've crossed the Pacific and the Atlantic more times than I can count...737type rating/ATP/FEX

But I dont meet the mins to even apply at UPS.

If I had 500 hours in a Transport, then I'd be qualified?

The ONLY guys who meet these mins are military heavy drivers. If you meet their mins and work for a civilian company, chances are you're not going to quit what you're doing to go back to seniority zero for the privledge of making $33,000 first year pay.
I for one think that requirement for oceanic crossings sucks. Flying the westpac, northpac, or NAT is about as easy as flying gets. If a person is proficient enough to fly 8 legs a day in and out of places like LGA, DFW, ORD, ATL, LAX, etc an ocean crossing would seem like a day off in comparison.

Many will disagree with me, but thats how I look at it.
viktorbravo is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:24 PM
  #59  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: a320
Posts: 27
Default

Originally Posted by flying_wendell
Does ferrying a King Air 200 / Army RC-12 from Korea to the US via Okinawa, Guam, Wake, Midway, Adak and ANC count as oceanic? It's sure not a heavy aircraft, but it was a very heavy King Air. And I definitely checked yes and filled out the app. We'll see what happens.
i don't think it specifies "heavy", just transport category a/c. i think the kingair fits that description. the b-1900 does, as well as any 19 seat t.prop a/c.
iballdriver is offline  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:31 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
Default

Originally Posted by viktorbravo
I for one think that requirement for oceanic crossings sucks. Flying the westpac, northpac, or NAT is about as easy as flying gets. If a person is proficient enough to fly 8 legs a day in and out of places like LGA, DFW, ORD, ATL, LAX, etc an ocean crossing would seem like a day off in comparison.

Many will disagree with me, but thats how I look at it.
I will agree that crossing the Atlantic and Pacific is not a very hard task to accomplish. However, when contingencies and abnormals arise, that is when it can become very challenging and very different from the domestic flying.

With that said, I don't think anyone is immune from learning how to do it. Not any different from learning anything else, all that is required is some reading and some training. I think a fighter guy, a heavy guy, and a guy hauling checks can learn it. In today's environment, I think the people being sought after are the ones who have already learned it and only need to learn the company-specific procedures that apply to it.
Led Zep is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freighter Captain
Cargo
29
05-22-2007 07:51 AM
Hornetguy
Cargo
1
04-10-2007 11:57 AM
Soyathink
Cargo
45
03-04-2007 04:47 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
67
01-24-2007 10:33 AM
Razor
Cargo
14
01-23-2007 08:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices