Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX 2007 Hiring Rumors >

FDX 2007 Hiring Rumors

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX 2007 Hiring Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2007, 09:22 PM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Purple F/O's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 319
Default

They can take furlough instead of retirement, but that would kick in the no volunteer/draft sections of the contract. Doh!
Purple F/O is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 05:59 AM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cargo Pirate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Left to right
Posts: 119
Default

I heard last week from a high source in the 10 program that there will be an excess bid in the fall.
Cargo Pirate is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 09:06 AM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SKYKN6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B777 Capt(retired)
Posts: 163
Default Section 23 (furlough)

Originally Posted by Purple F/O
They can take furlough instead of retirement, but that would kick in the no volunteer/draft sections of the contract. Doh!
Wrongo Swampbreath! If the -10 geezer FE does not take the 727 seat or if no seat he/she is qualified to hold is available (-10 excess) they are gone and not considered furloughed as far as the no volunteer section is concerned. The company can draft anytime, even with furloughs(but it is not "intended").
SKYKN6 is offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 10:23 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SKYKN6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B777 Capt(retired)
Posts: 163
Default Standing bid trumps!

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
It will have to be an awful big excess, as the last 30-35 guys on the list all have 3300 or higher seniority numbers. Not a lot of over 60 guys there, IMHO.
The spring MOAB will clean out the junior -10 FE window seat capables leaving only geezers by fall. How does management know this? They look at the standing bid! Duh! The big question is: If a geezer takes furlough over retirement and a plumber seat Never becomes available, can they come back from furlough to retire or do they lose their retirement? Me thinks it may be a big gamble involving lawyers and such.......
SKYKN6 is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 04:09 PM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Purple F/O's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 319
Default

Originally Posted by SKYKN6
Wrongo Swampbreath! If the -10 geezer FE does not take the 727 seat or if no seat he/she is qualified to hold is available (-10 excess) they are gone and not considered furloughed as far as the no volunteer section is concerned. The company can draft anytime, even with furloughs(but it is not "intended").
Swampbreath? Kind of mature language for an MD-11 Captain.

If the comany chose to do this to hook up some senior guys before age 60 changed:

23.A.2.A If the pilot is involuntarily excessed from his current crew
position and, as a result of his restriction, he is ineligible to
be awarded or assigned any other crew position, the pilot
may be furloughed.

Then they would trigger this:

23.A.11 There shall be no volunteer flying in any crew status while any
pilot is on furlough.


And yes, they could still cover all the flying they wanted to with Draft, but it would be under their control, not ours.
Purple F/O is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 05:04 PM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Last info I heard (today at lunch) was the company is looking at a bid to cover three years of training. The bid will include 757s, including an undisclosed as of yet FDA, and a large 10 excess bid. The significance of the three years, is the over 60 guys will either go to the 72 or most likely retire, prior to the next bid, when they could possibly bid back to the left seat. Don't know if I understand the logic of that, but that's what I was told.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 05:36 PM
  #167  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by fdx727pilot
The significance of the three years, is the over 60 guys will either go to the 72 or most likely retire, prior to the next bid, when they could possibly bid back to the left seat. Don't know if I understand the logic of that, but that's what I was told.
So they won't have to furlough them and shut down the VLT train?
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 06:11 PM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
130JDrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 349
Default

Originally Posted by Purple F/O
Swampbreath? Kind of mature language for an MD-11 Captain.

If the comany chose to do this to hook up some senior guys before age 60 changed:

23.A.2.A If the pilot is involuntarily excessed from his current crew
position and, as a result of his restriction, he is ineligible to
be awarded or assigned any other crew position, the pilot
may be furloughed.

Then they would trigger this:

23.A.11 There shall be no volunteer flying in any crew status while any
pilot is on furlough.


And yes, they could still cover all the flying they wanted to with Draft, but it would be under their control, not ours.
The key word there is "MAY" be furloughed. In an excess bid, there does not have to be a vacancy for them to move to. If they all go to the 727, (i know), and we had to many 727 FE's then we would have a company excess and the last guys hired would be the first ones out the door. Not the 10 guys.


Past....
130JDrvr is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 06:20 PM
  #169  
SNAFU
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey, but whatever you do, don't you dare suggest that the Age 60 change will slow down hiring or effect us because we don't have any furloughees (right now).
 
Old 03-25-2007, 07:03 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Purple F/O's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 319
Default

Originally Posted by 130JDrvr
The key word there is "MAY" be furloughed. In an excess bid, there does not have to be a vacancy for them to move to. If they all go to the 727, (i know), and we had to many 727 FE's then we would have a company excess and the last guys hired would be the first ones out the door. Not the 10 guys.


Past....
Well, these are mostly academic discussions, but I disagree. They would excess the under 60 new-hires out of the back and they would be able to bid F/O seats(if they are available, which they probably would). Then, if they ever got to an age 60 guy, he would be forced into complying with section 23.

Interesting tact by the company to make a 3 year training letter. Unrealistic by many accounts, but it sure would forces the Ropes to make up their mind. Wait 3 years to upgrade back to the front seat, if the law allows, or just throw in the towel. This whole age 60 thing is dicking up the entire program.
Purple F/O is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
JetJock16
Regional
14
02-23-2007 06:39 AM
GBU-24
Cargo
6
02-14-2007 06:11 AM
fr8rcaptain
Hiring News
5
10-03-2006 09:15 PM
Typhoonpilot
Foreign
70
05-23-2006 09:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices