Search

Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

No ATP Written: Options?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2014, 04:51 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by IDIOTPILOT
I'm not sure exactly what grounds the FSDO has since the rule clearly states the air carrier is allowed to provide the training. It cannot be part of the new-hire syllabus, so a separate program will need to be made. It could be laziness on the part that now the CMO and other air carrier inspectors have to be responsible for this course, instead of letting it fall under the GA part of the FSDO.
I'm hoping a 141/142 course such as higher power aviation will have less issues getting approved.
Beech90 is offline  
Old 08-19-2014, 05:00 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
Default

Originally Posted by Beech90
It's amazing how the FAA is being so difficult with implement these courses, especially since the rule has been in effect for almost a month.
Although there is lots of backlog, most of the time when a program is given to the FAA for review, there are multiple errors and issues with it. The FAA is only allowed to accept it if it's "perfect" as far as regulatory requirements and acceptance criteria are concerned. Doesn't mean it has to be a perfect program, but can't have misspellings, page numbers that don't make sense, confusing parts, contradictory parts, must meet regulations, etc. Because this unfortunately does not happen the first time, it becomes a "back and forth" between whomever submitted the program and who reviews it. Now think about all the people in the world (US) that want a program of any kind (not just ATP CTP stuff) or a modification to an existing one, and you can get an idea of the constant pulling in opposite directions that they face. This is why the rule from congress had so much lead time. If one simply didn't believe it was going to happen or thought there'd be an "out" right before the deadline, it's kind of too bad now unfortunately.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 08-19-2014, 05:39 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
Although there is lots of backlog, most of the time when a program is given to the FAA for review, there are multiple errors and issues with it. The FAA is only allowed to accept it if it's "perfect" as far as regulatory requirements and acceptance criteria are concerned. Doesn't mean it has to be a perfect program, but can't have misspellings, page numbers that don't make sense, confusing parts, contradictory parts, must meet regulations, etc. Because this unfortunately does not happen the first time, it becomes a "back and forth" between whomever submitted the program and who reviews it. Now think about all the people in the world (US) that want a program of any kind (not just ATP CTP stuff) or a modification to an existing one, and you can get an idea of the constant pulling in opposite directions that they face. This is why the rule from congress had so much lead time. If one simply didn't believe it was going to happen or thought there'd be an "out" right before the deadline, it's kind of too bad now unfortunately.
Hopefully I'm not SOL too long.
Beech90 is offline  
Old 08-19-2014, 06:25 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,733
Default

Originally Posted by Beech90
It's not available to the public.
It's available to anyone with 4 years to spare and $200,000+ to spend.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 08-20-2014, 06:49 AM
  #25  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
There's a lot more that goes on during flight instruction than people give it credit for and it's a lot more applicable to crew environments and dealing with people on a daily basis in the same sense. You are flying with different people frequently that have different habits, you have to modify your teaching and behavior to achieve a successful outcome, because they are all different. If you are any kind of observant person (kind of important when flying planes) you'll notice there are almost infinite iterations of how someone can "screw up" and you learn from each and every one of those mistakes. Sitting there observing landing after landing you realize what really goes on and what really contributes to aircraft control, rather than just reacting automatically because someone told you to do so. You'll experience people trying to put themselves into descents and approaches without being prepared, causing extreme task overload, you'll get to realize what it means to be the person ultimately responsible for a flight, you'll get to instill habits that will prevent future accidents.

As a captain, you'll be expected to train first officers, you'll be ultimately responsible for the flight, you'll be required to deal with all kinds of different people every day, you'll have to get along with many different first officers, cabin crew and passengers, you'll have to monitor the flight and your FO to ensure they are prepared to descend and make an approach, you'll have to build and shape the FO and ensure they are demonstrating the skills and behaviors that will make them successful pilots and captains.

This isn't all that different and the attitude of "I don't want to instruct, I just want to get to an airline" completely misses the point that you'll be required to do many of the same things and demonstrate many of the same behaviors/be put under many of the same stresses. If you can't handle it at the flight instruction level, you probably can't handle it in "real life", although they are both just as "real". I can appreciate flight instruction being distasteful because one was operating under the assumption that they sacrifice and get their certificates/ratings and then get automatically hired by an airline. Most people at first operated under that assumption and as the reality has become clearer during training and progression they come to see that each step requires at least several years. That's reality unfortunately.
Agree 100%, and this discussion hints at the difference between those who have a deeper appreciation of the art & profession of flying vs. those who are essentially job-hoppers in basic outlook, and there is a difference. Having flown with various captains all of whom exhibit solid piloting skills, I noticed the ones who also had nice teaching skills were by far the better ones to work with. I did not always see a correlation with those who had their CFI tickets and who could teach well, but differences in teaching skill were painfully obvious anyway since the key marker of the non-teacher is a quick rise in frustration when things were not going well with the student. Their attitude tends to be, you do not come here to learn, you come to work, why are you wasting my time trying to teach you something.

By contrast the skilled teacher sees it as a chance to improve the other pilot while improving the self in the process. Airlines often do not make teaching skill a large part of captain upgrade evalution, although some try and place key pilots such as the check airmen through sim instructing duty before check airman status is awarded. It is common for the job hopping types to end up teaching other pilots when they really should not be used in that role. I do not take a side on the ATP rule changes we have now, but if there is an outcome I'd like to see it would be that more airline pilots are forced to teach a couple of seasons in GA before getting to the airline environment where teaching is not as easy to learn or adequately rewarded.

Last edited by Cubdriver; 08-20-2014 at 07:02 AM. Reason: spelling
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 08-20-2014, 08:49 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Default

Originally Posted by Beech90
I'm hoping a 141/142 course such as higher power aviation will have less issues getting approved.
Flightsafety was working on one as well.
Std Deviation is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Irishflyer
Career Questions
5
12-08-2010 02:30 PM
INVERTED
Regional
16
10-06-2009 05:16 AM
dashtrash300
Flight Schools and Training
53
04-27-2009 11:33 AM
Tuckster
Flight Schools and Training
3
06-19-2007 07:54 AM
PositiveRate
Flight Schools and Training
13
02-25-2007 11:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices