Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Majors not counting turbo prop PIC time >

Majors not counting turbo prop PIC time

Search

Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Majors not counting turbo prop PIC time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2014, 12:56 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 55
Default Majors not counting turbo prop PIC time

My buddy who is a captain at a 121 major had a guy from a 121 regional in the jump seat the other day who was telling him that majors are not counting turbo prop pic time one for one anymore (was news to my friend who is already at a major). I know I've heard many boards say that without glass/fms time that you're not competitive these days, but never this.

I will also say that this particular jump seater was also a recruiter for that particular regional, and they were talking about my situation as a part 135 BE99/1900 guy in the left seat building my turbine PIC time that way.

Anyone else heard other talk about this?
Phxdvt17 is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 02:14 PM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,041
Default

TPIC without glass/jet time is probably not going to do the trick anymore. Maybe at SWA?

But if you have TPIC and also some jet time, even as SIC, that's probably good if not great.

TPIC = ability to command

Jet/glass time = ability to complete training on a jet
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 02:56 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,650
Default

Sounds like a solid piece of information from a super credible source.
I think the guys in the airlines doing the hiring are smart enough to know that some turboprop time is better than others. Keep getting those boxes checked and you will get the call.
I have never seen anyone have trouble going from steam gauges to glass given a normal training syllabus. It ain't hard. Once you learn to use it to increase your SA and know enough to not let it decrease your SA when it is time to fly the plane, you are money.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 03:37 PM
  #4  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,754
Default

Originally Posted by Phxdvt17
My buddy who is a captain at a 121 major had a guy from a 121 regional in the jump seat the other day who was telling him that majors are not counting turbo prop pic time one for one anymore (was news to my friend who is already at a major). I know I've heard many boards say that without glass/fms time that you're not competitive these days, but never this.

I will also say that this particular jump seater was also a recruiter for that particular regional, and they were talking about my situation as a part 135 BE99/1900 guy in the left seat building my turbine PIC time that way.

Anyone else heard other talk about this?
Being a 135 guy will probably make it a little tougher. Since you're building TPIC, I would get 1500-2000 hours and then look at the 121 world.

Not sure how things are now, but I was hired at 2 desirable places (although the last was 8 years ago) with only TP PIC.
Swedish Blender is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 04:18 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
Default

A friend of a stewardess who know's a real life captain said that they are going to certify all 121 airplanes single-pilot starting in in January.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 04:20 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Pitot heat, what's to eat?
Posts: 392
Default

Every airline and recruiter has somewhat different standards, but I personally know several folks (myself included) that where hired recently at a legacy or major with nothing but turboprop PIC time. If anything, standards are going down, not up, these days.

I also personally know several folks who came over from corporate or 135 straight to a legacy or major, and never flew for a regional.

Life is hard for a recruiter for a regional airline these days. Not surprised they are resorting to the hard sell. That said, BE99/BE1900 time alone is certainly not as good on a resume as 121 Jet. But it checks the box, and if you are good at networking, have good recommendations, and interview well it could very well be enough.
ackattacker is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 05:40 PM
  #7  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

Originally Posted by Phxdvt17
My buddy who is a captain at a 121 major had a guy from a 121 regional in the jump seat the other day who was telling him that majors are not counting turbo prop pic time one for one anymore (was news to my friend who is already at a major). I know I've heard many boards say that without glass/fms time that you're not competitive these days, but never this.

I will also say that this particular jump seater was also a recruiter for that particular regional, and they were talking about my situation as a part 135 BE99/1900 guy in the left seat building my turbine PIC time that way.

Anyone else heard other talk about this?
Interesting, I know a guy who got recently hired at SWA and another at DAL, within ??? last 24 months, who had ZERO JET time and all turbine PIC was logged in turboprops

no glass either, unless a SF340's EFIS-85 is "glass" by 2014 standards

non-military, yes college
satpak77 is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 08:22 PM
  #8  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 55
Default

I appreciate all the input, especially JamesNoBrakes, your input was the most beneficial of all.

I feel that there are ways to bridge the gap like getting a type in a "pure jet". However, then you may run into the question of "no time in type, your first choice must be xxx airline".

A big hole I found in this was that many regionals, and 135 operators fly large turbo props (Q400, EMB-120' etc...). So unless you're forced to fly these Acft by the operator, why would one even choose to fly one. Many young pilots rely on these types to get their time.

Last edited by Phxdvt17; 05-24-2014 at 08:32 PM.
Phxdvt17 is offline  
Old 05-24-2014, 09:16 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
Default

If there is a company that "won't look at you unless you have turbojet PIC" then you want to avoid such a company, as their screwed up HR department that doesn't consider the "full person" is probably indicative of their entire company. Pilots tend to get tunnel vision of "what's important", thinking that the only way to get with a major airline is to get "under-wing-jet-time" in a E175 for a 121 operator. This is ridiculous, and yes they are looking for "experience", but pilots start splitting hairs like crazy trying to build the "one thing they are looking for", at least in their view. There are lots of things that could be indicative of a pilot's competency and ability beyond "jet PIC" and any decent company and HR department operates in just this way. If they don't, it opens them up to lawsuits and other issues. Usually this "heard from another pilot" stuff is worthless. HR are the ones in control here.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 05-25-2014, 06:31 AM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,041
Default

Should have mentioned before, SKW Brasilia check airmen are definitely getting hired by legacies. Some of them had jet time as FO's, some did not.

Not sure if that extends to 135 beech 1900 check airmen (ie lakes).

Based on that I would say that 121 check airman time is better than anything but quality mil time. But from a career planning perspective it might be risky to hang your hat on that...check airmen slots are not awarded by seniority, there's no guarantee you'll ever get one.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Around123
Regional
73
01-09-2014 09:37 AM
Cheddar
United
98
05-30-2013 04:51 AM
jbt1407
Aviation Law
10
09-15-2012 10:42 AM
Protrident
Career Questions
4
12-13-2011 06:01 PM
CaptainTeezy
Regional
32
01-12-2007 09:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices