Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Preparing for Interview: Multi-engine Systems >

Preparing for Interview: Multi-engine Systems

Search

Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Preparing for Interview: Multi-engine Systems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2006, 03:30 PM
  #1  
Part Time
Thread Starter
 
undflyboy06's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Chief Pilot PC-12NG
Posts: 629
Default Preparing for Interview: Multi-engine Systems

Hi everyone,

I've read multiple posts on people stating that when you go in for your interview for an airline to be knowledgeable on your systems.

My question is do you want to be knowledgeable on your latest multi engine aircraft, or the most complex multi aircraft that you have flown? The reason is because most of my multi time is in a Piper Seneca, but I have close to 30 hours in a Cessna 340.

Thanks again!
undflyboy06 is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:45 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Know the basics on both. If you're more familiar with the Senneca, I'd study the 340 because that isn't exactly a simple system. Lots of fuel tanks, pressurization, turbocharged. Lots of stuff going on there.
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:53 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Master and Commander of Pipers and Cessnas
Posts: 126
Default

If you have been PIC of a given plane recently (in the last year, what do you all think?) you'd probably better still have some systems knowledge from that plane to display.
lzakplt is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 04:19 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: DHC-6 / PC-12
Posts: 213
Default

I logged 40 hours PIC in a Russian-built Antonov AN-2 two years ago and I got asked about systems on that in one of my interviews. I think that it was more out of curiosity, but they still asked. The problem was that in 1951 POHs didn't really exist and the little bit that did was in Russian as were the gauges. (Quick what altitude are you at if the alti says 1800 meters?) We flew thae plane on the "whatever worked" method, which was still good enough to take 10 people out of an 1800 foot strip! I knew enough to talk my way out of it, but it was a good thing that they didn't dig any deeper....
AVIVIII is offline  
Old 10-10-2007, 12:54 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Default

If they don't like you, they're gonna find a reason to ask trival things about a plane you've hardly flown or are clearly not current in.

Makes it easier on their conscience when they say no and gives them an easily exploited situation or reason for not hiring you.
NYCPilot is offline  
Old 10-16-2007, 01:51 PM
  #6  
Furlough line holder
 
andy171773's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ2, ATR, CRJ7, E145, 737
Posts: 1,845
Default

30 hours is a fairly significant chunk of time. But they're usually understanding if you're not as sharp in that, as your primary multi engine aircraft. Be prepared for both.
andy171773 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Future SWA CAPT
Flight Schools and Training
71
09-10-2016 07:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices