I NEED your advice!!!
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
#22
The only 91 time that counts is 91k, which is fractional.
#23
Banned
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
2) is she the resourceful, independent type
3) is her mother closeby?
4) do you ABSOLUTELY have to do this right now?
I agree with the others who suggest getting your ATP and maybe applying to spirit or something. With that much turbine PIC you're way above the "Hole and a heartbeat" that the regionals are taking right now. You have a lot more options.
#26
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,261
If rated for the aircraft (category, class, and type as applicable to the aircraft), then he's legal to log the time as pilot in command.
Turbine time, and turbojet time, does not necessarily meet the requirements of 1000 hours PIC in this context, however, as that time has specific conditions attached.
The regulation you quoted, however is applicable not to the logging of PIC experience, nor to acting as PIC of turbine or turbojet equipment in general. You're confusing your regulations, and are looking in the wrong place. You're considering operations under Fractional (14 CFR 91 Subpart K) operations, which is inapplicable. The original poster stated he has been operating under Part 91 corporate operations, which do not need to meet the requirements of fractional operators, nor hold an operating certificate.
Time acquired for a corporate operation that does not require an ATP, and which is not fractional, charter, or airline in aircraft requiring a type, in operations requiring an ATP, in aircraft having 10 or more passenger seats, does not meet the 1000 hour requirement that a "street captain" would need.
#27
The original poster has not stated what he flew. He stated that he has turbine experience as pilot in command.
If rated for the aircraft (category, class, and type as applicable to the aircraft), then he's legal to log the time as pilot in command.
Turbine time, and turbojet time, does not necessarily meet the requirements of 1000 hours PIC in this context, however, as that time has specific conditions attached.
The regulation you quoted, however is applicable not to the logging of PIC experience, nor to acting as PIC of turbine or turbojet equipment in general. You're confusing your regulations, and are looking in the wrong place. You're considering operations under Fractional (14 CFR 91 Subpart K) operations, which is inapplicable. The original poster stated he has been operating under Part 91 corporate operations, which do not need to meet the requirements of fractional operators, nor hold an operating certificate.
Time acquired for a corporate operation that does not require an ATP, and which is not fractional, charter, or airline in aircraft requiring a type, in operations requiring an ATP, in aircraft having 10 or more passenger seats, does not meet the 1000 hour requirement that a "street captain" would need.
If rated for the aircraft (category, class, and type as applicable to the aircraft), then he's legal to log the time as pilot in command.
Turbine time, and turbojet time, does not necessarily meet the requirements of 1000 hours PIC in this context, however, as that time has specific conditions attached.
The regulation you quoted, however is applicable not to the logging of PIC experience, nor to acting as PIC of turbine or turbojet equipment in general. You're confusing your regulations, and are looking in the wrong place. You're considering operations under Fractional (14 CFR 91 Subpart K) operations, which is inapplicable. The original poster stated he has been operating under Part 91 corporate operations, which do not need to meet the requirements of fractional operators, nor hold an operating certificate.
Time acquired for a corporate operation that does not require an ATP, and which is not fractional, charter, or airline in aircraft requiring a type, in operations requiring an ATP, in aircraft having 10 or more passenger seats, does not meet the 1000 hour requirement that a "street captain" would need.