TSA Now FWI Experts
04-04-2016, 10:00 AM
#21
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,261
Please explain me how can you defend the TSA who recently was involved in interdicting a credentialed crew member(F/A) who fled the scene of a drug smuggling attempt and failed in maintaining security responsibilities in their Airport AOR.
The TSA then allowed the same drug smuggling suspect to board another commercial flight USING HER CREW IDENTIFICATION AFTER BEING SCREENED AND CLEARED TO BOARD BY THE TSA, (while several Federal Law Enforcement Agencies were actively seeking her arrest).
The TSA then allowed the same drug smuggling suspect to board another commercial flight USING HER CREW IDENTIFICATION AFTER BEING SCREENED AND CLEARED TO BOARD BY THE TSA, (while several Federal Law Enforcement Agencies were actively seeking her arrest).
You continue to rabble on about facts, which continues to be a lie.
You've presented a case of a drunk pilot, confirmed with not one but two tests by law enforcement, with no mention or hint of TSA, and attempted to use it as your springboard agenda attack on TSA.
In this you've wholly failed, and lied, as is the premise of the thread and thread title (to say nothing of your invention of "FWI") a lie. Your continued lies in asserting "facts" when your presentations are wholly devoid of fact or foundation speaks volumes about your real agenda here. Given your lack of credibility, given your dogged adherence to the lies, and given your inability to stick to the topic of your own thread, you'll fit nicely on the ignore list. No longer worthy of response. Good luck with your rage.
This message is hidden because NotPart91 is on your ignore list.
04-06-2016, 10:47 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Video of the event
Exclusive video shows allegedly drunk pilot arrested at Detroit Metro Airport - WXYZ.com
Something new from the story, and the video, that I had not heard before laying responsibility on the Captain for calling authorities.
Exclusive video shows allegedly drunk pilot arrested at Detroit Metro Airport - WXYZ.com
Something new from the story, and the video, that I had not heard before laying responsibility on the Captain for calling authorities.
We're told the captain of the flight noticed some suspicious activity and called authorities immediately.
04-07-2016, 07:04 AM
#25
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,261
So...article doesn't mention TSA, captain actually turned the F/O in...thread title uses a made-up "FWI" to springboard an attack on TSA for overstepping their authority.
Given that the original poster (This message is hidden because NotPart91 is on your ignore list) whined about TSA's lack of authority to turn a pilot in, what does this say about the captain. Should he be drawn and quartered, whipped at the post, and left to bleed in a gutter, because he lacked the same powers of law enforcement? What if a passenger noticed a drunk pilot? A vendor in the terminal? A reporter? Some old guy with no teeth who thought he was in a bowling alley?
Anyone who becomes aware of an unsafe condition has an obligation to report that condition.
The F/O should have been drawn and quartered for wearing a baseball cap in the terminal. The fact that he was drunk twice the legal limit quite irrelevant to the original poster's rant.
Given that the original poster (This message is hidden because NotPart91 is on your ignore list) whined about TSA's lack of authority to turn a pilot in, what does this say about the captain. Should he be drawn and quartered, whipped at the post, and left to bleed in a gutter, because he lacked the same powers of law enforcement? What if a passenger noticed a drunk pilot? A vendor in the terminal? A reporter? Some old guy with no teeth who thought he was in a bowling alley?
Anyone who becomes aware of an unsafe condition has an obligation to report that condition.
The F/O should have been drawn and quartered for wearing a baseball cap in the terminal. The fact that he was drunk twice the legal limit quite irrelevant to the original poster's rant.
04-07-2016, 07:57 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
04-17-2016, 09:07 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 269
It's amazing how some people, are hooked without a worm and jump right to conclusions.
Besides my flight experience;
I specialize in Gov't , Corporate and VIP Security. I had personally observed the probing and testing of TSA Checkpoints, (I'll let you guess how effective they were at their assigned duties).
You can Google TSA OIG for more information and the TSA Checkpoint success rate and failures, (if not already referenced in my prior posts).
My posts stand As-Is. Sorry I can't share more.
Once again, thanks for all the support and all the chuckles.
"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority...."Daniel Webster
04-19-2016, 07:10 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
Thanks for the entertainment.
It's amazing how some people, are hooked without a worm and jump right to conclusions.
Besides my flight experience;
I specialize in Gov't , Corporate and VIP Security. I had personally observed the probing and testing of TSA Checkpoints, (I'll let you guess how effective they were at their assigned duties).
You can Google TSA OIG for more information and the TSA Checkpoint success rate and failures, (if not already referenced in my prior posts).
My posts stand As-Is. Sorry I can't share more.
Once again, thanks for all the support and all the chuckles.
It's amazing how some people, are hooked without a worm and jump right to conclusions.
Besides my flight experience;
I specialize in Gov't , Corporate and VIP Security. I had personally observed the probing and testing of TSA Checkpoints, (I'll let you guess how effective they were at their assigned duties).
You can Google TSA OIG for more information and the TSA Checkpoint success rate and failures, (if not already referenced in my prior posts).
My posts stand As-Is. Sorry I can't share more.
Once again, thanks for all the support and all the chuckles.
The entire context of your thread was that the TSA was giving breathalyzers and trying to say they were acting as "experts in determining Drunk in Public, DUI and FWI Offenses."
Except, it wasn't the TSA doing any of this, it was the airport police, so the entire premise of everything you are spouting in this thread is false. Your post doesn't stand for anything, it's just a classic "I was proven wrong so I'm going to compensate with some more stuff and post a bunch".
When did the TSA Screeners start receiving Drug/Alcohol Recognition training and are they certified on how to recognize a person under the influence of such?
I'm in no way advocating FWI, but more of a critic how the TSA overreaches their administrative search authorities.
TSA Screeners cannot detain, arrest or seize evidence
Point being is that TSA continually oversteps its "Administrative Search Authority" and keeps trying to play a "Real Cop."
When these issues have been brought up, somehow the TSA lost the case files or "cannot release the requested information" using excuses, (that would never hold their weight in a court of law), which usually results in a mitigation of any proposed fines or a dismissal of the TSA's allegations.
The only thing that is clear is your hatred of the TSA and it has nothing to do with this case/situation. I'm not exactly sure what you are "standing by", you should have quit a long time ago.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
