Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
Visual approach, weather missing. Legal? >

Visual approach, weather missing. Legal?

Search

Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Visual approach, weather missing. Legal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2009, 10:17 AM
  #21  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

Its been quite a few yrs since I have been faced with a problem like this but the way I seem to remember it is...you can have the SA or metar missing but can using an FT for a substitute. Assuming you will be arriving during the time the forecast is valid.
Thedude is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 01:34 PM
  #22  
Snakes & Nape
 
Phantom Flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: B-767 Captain
Posts: 775
Wink Call Your Lawyer

Originally Posted by beebopbogo
So we were flying 121, severe clear into an uncontrolled airport in Podunk, Wyoming. The ASOS reported "missing" for everything but the altimeter. Center couldn't supply the local weather, either. We called the airport in sight, but can we legally accept a visual approach from Center?
I don't think so. Check Powerful1 posting, check your FOM and more importantly.....CHECK YOUR OPSPECS. They are your "bible" and you are bound by what's contained therein.

G'Luck Mates
Phantom Flyer is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 01:13 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 784
Default

I ran into this problem a time or two up in them Wyoming parts. If the ATIS or AWOS/ASOS you have is less than an hour old, you are good to go. Otherwise you need a qualified observer on the ground. This is why airlines like Lakes train ground personel to be qualified wx observers. It is a pain when the weather is clear and a million but it must be done this way per the regs. Also I agree with whoever said that you can just land any way if its the safest option. ie low fuel or whatnot but that goes with anything. Thats when the big book goes out the window and you have to step up to the plate and be a captain.
ovrtake92 is offline  
Old 08-22-2009, 07:22 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Milk Man's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 710
Default

Part 121, the weather must be reporting or you can not land. even if its a beautiful day
Milk Man is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 07:57 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,419
Default

Still can't find the FAR approved expiration time for weather.

Do know I can't dispatch unless the forecast or observation is good enough to land at my destination
FAR Part 121 Sec. 121.613 effective as of 11/18/1967

And all 121.655 says is the latest weather is controlling.

FAR Part 121 Sec. 121.655 effective as of 04/01/1965

And if VFR isn't legal for 121 ops, why is there a section outlining the mins?
(Doesn't preclude a particular company from restricting VFR flight to a non-towered airport, but, the feds are cool with it)
FAR Part 121 Sec. 121.649 effective as of 09/16/1993

To me, barring a weather or forecast observation below mins. The Crew should be legal to commence the approach, then make a determination about whether the weather is sufficient to land under Cat 2 or better approach mins.
Cat 3 mins and you should be going around even if you see the runway, unless the Capt determines that landing is the safest option and uses his/her emergency authority to land.

When I'm the PIC, just not going to divert if the inflight vis is 30+miles just because the ASOS is broken
kronan is offline  
Old 08-23-2009, 10:04 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 807
Post

Reference to dispatch weather minimums: Domestically you must have a forecast of minimums to dispatch, under Flag rules you are allowed to have a forecast of zero/zero, provided you have an alternate. (At "my house" two alternates are required, with fuel requirements to the farther alternate.)

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 08-24-2009, 08:00 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,733
Default

There is no "expiration" time for a wx ob. The ob reports the wx at the time it was taken. The NWS has standards for when a new ob has to be taken. You could have a "SPECI" report 2 minutes after the METAR if the wind swings enough, a thunderstorm starts or ends, the ceiling lifts or drops a given amount, etc. With an observer in place, it's implied that the reported wx is valid until a new report comes out. Without the coverage, you have no idea what the weather IS, just what it WAS.

And if VFR isn't legal for 121 ops, why is there a section outlining the mins?

It's just not legal for you, you don't have paragraph B51 in your OPS SPECs.

What's a Forecast Observation? If the current wx is at or above your minumums for the approach, you shoot it and see what happens. If you've got IIIb in you OPS SPECs, it's a IIIb approach and the plane and crew are good for IIIb, you'll never see the runway till you touch down.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 01:36 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,419
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp
And if VFR isn't legal for 121 ops, why is there a section outlining the mins?

It's just not legal for you, you don't have paragraph B51 in your OPS SPECS
If it's not legal for me, why is it approved in my FOM?

Just because something is unusual, doesn't mean it's prohibited. FARs give the Capt a ton of leeway to safely operate a flight.
If you, as the Capt, feel landing a plane at a non-towered airport without a vis report is beyond your capabilities, then don't do it.

I don't think there's a company out there that's going to relish the monkey wrench you just threw into the system. But, I'll gladly open the pocketbook if the company over-reacts and tells you to hit the street.
(Especially since most non-towered ops are in the midnight-5 timeframe--have to think a divert might put you beyond duty limits, limited turn possibilities, and how do you get an "approved" weather guy out to the field to fix the problem you diverted for. Can't you just see the film running on CNN-certainly shouldn't consider the media as part of your decision making. Although I guarantee the company will consider it and likely overreact.)
kronan is offline  
Old 08-25-2009, 05:06 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,733
Default

Originally Posted by kronan
If it's not legal for me, why is it approved in my FOM?
I thought you were asking the question, if you've got VFR in your FOM and OPS SPECs then it's not illegal.

If you, as the Capt, feel landing a plane at a non-towered airport without a vis report is beyond your capabilities, then don't do it.

I don't think it's beyond my capabilities, I just think that without declaring an emergency first, it's illegal.

Especially since most non-towered ops are in the midnight-5 timeframe--
having to think a divert might put you beyond duty time limits, limited turn
possibilities, and how do you get an "approved" weather guy out to the field

Having spent 25+ years checking in at sunset and getting to the hotel after sunrise, I've got a pretty good idea of how the ATC system works at night. And I've checked into a hotel a few times at 2am for 8 hours. If I only divert to an airport with WX at 2 or 3 in the morning, I think there will be WX at 10 in the morning (except ILN.)
Twin Wasp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
caboarder2001
Aviation Law
28
03-30-2009 03:13 PM
Milk Man
Regional
44
02-13-2009 08:14 AM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
72
11-30-2008 03:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices