Night current
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,993
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Join AOPA with legal services. Then pose the question to the AOPA legal section. Cheaper than consulting an attorney. Also, monthly magazines, good reads, is a pretty nice benefit.
![](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/clear.gif)
#12
On Reserve
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: Seated
Posts: 20
![Default](https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
JohnB, Curious because it appears that by that interpretation we have created a crew member were one doesnt exist by certification or regulation. In the case of a PIC or SIC their duty stations are defined. Likewise in the case of a flight instructor. However for an "acting pilot in command", that isnt part of a two pilot crew as required by certification or regulation (part 135, safety pilot, or flight instruction) there is no defined duty station. Is there a reg preventing them from being in the back seats?
"Pilot B does not need to manipulate the controls to act as pilot in command" - It would seem that an "acting PIC" would be unable to perform his duty of taking immediate action in an inflight emergency as required under 91.3.
"Pilot B does not need to manipulate the controls to act as pilot in command" - It would seem that an "acting PIC" would be unable to perform his duty of taking immediate action in an inflight emergency as required under 91.3.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post