Search

Notices

Atlas Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2012, 09:03 AM
  #3111  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat
I can give you one piece of information that you CAN take to the bank: Atlas will not...repeat...will not...buy any operation that will involve the merging of seniority lists. They might buy assets...and maybe even offer preferential interview and hiring opportunities...but they will not buy an operation and go through an integration process or the risk of absorbing any employee group that they haven't had the chance to screen themselves.
Don't doubt that in the least. But if AAWW did choose to go the "merge" route under an SOC, McCaskill Bond would say something different as far as how employees from the acquired/bought/merged company(ies) would be treated.

And IIRC, even multiple certificates under the same holding company can get sticky as well. RAH, PCL, etc.
xjtguy is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:21 AM
  #3112  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Exactly right, xjt. Sure Atlas has AMC contracts. So does Global. If Atlas wants GLOBAL'S AMC contracts, they'll need GLOBAL'S assets to service them. Duh.

And as far as the Atlas Inflight Department goes, that's in IAH, correct? So IF they take NAA and the NAA crews, they'll need supervisory help in JFK, no?

You guys need to pull your head out of the sand. Organic growth won't cut it when you want to take big steps. You've said yourself that the training department is maxxed out getting rid of the classics and standing up the 767 program.

Even SWA the penultimate "internal growth" organization bit the bullet and bought AAI. What makes you think Atlas management gives a darn about what pilots think/want. Having served in the Navy with your CP (if Mikey B is still there, that is!) I can attest to the fact that HE doesn't.

You also seem to want to ignore the fact that Atlas has already approached Global about buying NAA in the past. Global told them if they wanted NAA they had to take World, too. Atlas didn't want anything to do with the MD-11s so rejected the deal.

This bankruptcy takes care of the MD-11 question and offers Atlas the passenger 744s and 767s they covet. Its too neat a package.
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:26 AM
  #3113  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Default

I don't think it's so much a matter of what EXACTLY AAWW management will or won't do as far as how they decide to grow.

What would be MORE important would be the scope, merger, acquisition, and successorship language that was put into the new Atlas Pilot's CBA.

ESPECIALLY as it relates to being able to operate multiple certificates under the same holdings corp, etc. If at all.

Is the Polar certificate STILL active or is it going to die out or be sold off? Does the TITAN Leasing side have an operating certificate or is just that, a leasing company?
xjtguy is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:31 AM
  #3114  
On Reserve
 
Agflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: C-17 Reserve Bum
Posts: 23
Default

I applied to Atlas last fall and haven't heard a peep. Is it fair to consider that my app isn't going anywhere?
Agflyer is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 12:37 PM
  #3115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
744driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: B767 CA
Posts: 1,100
Default

xjt,
We already operate under two Certificates...Atlas and Polar. And Polar certificate will stay as it is, since it is with the Polar certificate that we fly the DHL 744 flights.

Fish,
I agree with you that Management is not likely to ask my opinion on any issue...however, like ATC said above, Atlas has a proven way that they like to run their operation, and that includes mergers.
744driver is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 01:06 PM
  #3116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Whaledriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 466
Default

The Polar certificate will stay as is, since DHL owns 49% of Polar. Titan does not have a certificate, as they are a leasing company, for the time being.
Whaledriver is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 04:22 PM
  #3117  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 8
Default

Thread should be re-named to ""Speculate the future of Atlas""

The earlier posts do a great job with helping guys get hired, now It's getting out of control.
ECHO8015 is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 05:03 PM
  #3118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: What day is it?
Posts: 963
Default

Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
Exactly right, xjt. Sure Atlas has AMC contracts. So does Global. If Atlas wants GLOBAL'S AMC contracts, they'll need GLOBAL'S assets to service them. Duh.
Um...no

And as far as the Atlas Inflight Department goes, that's in IAH, correct? So IF they take NAA and the NAA crews, they'll need supervisory help in JFK, no?
Correctomundo...no they won't. You clearly don't understand the way Atlas operates.

You guys need to pull your head out of the sand. Organic growth won't cut it when you want to take big steps. You've said yourself that the training department is maxxed out getting rid of the classics and standing up the 767 program.
Um...no again. The training department is running full because we have bodies on the property to train before we dip into the pool or invite more into the pool.

Even SWA the penultimate "internal growth" organization bit the bullet and bought AAI. What makes you think Atlas management gives a darn about what pilots think/want. Having served in the Navy with your CP (if Mikey B is still there, that is!) I can attest to the fact that HE doesn't.
Um..nope again...Mikey departed the CP fix a couple of years back...and he was far enough down the food chain that his opinions on decisions to acquire additional assets were not considered.

You also seem to want to ignore the fact that Atlas has already approached Global about buying NAA in the past. Global told them if they wanted NAA they had to take World, too. Atlas didn't want anything to do with the MD-11s so rejected the deal.
Define "past."

This bankruptcy takes care of the MD-11 question and offers Atlas the passenger 744s and 767s they covet. Its too neat a package.
The fundamental flaw in your argument is the assumption that Atlas must have additional AMC contracts. They don't. I also suspect you don't understand how they operate their business plan, because if you did, you'd understand the flaw in your assumptions.

However...assuming they do want more AMC business? I suspect they have better contacts with the AMC folks than you might and also suspect that given their relationship with the AMC folks, they already have a plan on the shelf ready to go.

Which explains why they make lots of money.
ATCsaidDoWhat is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 05:44 PM
  #3119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Talon1011's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Ex USAF, ex-ATA , currently Atlas Air 747 CA
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by ECHO8015
Thread should be re-named to ""Speculate the future of Atlas""

The earlier posts do a great job with helping guys get hired, now It's getting out of control.
Precisely. Moderators, can we please move these merger/buyout/daily rumor posts to their own area? Then we can get back to the business of helping good people join our merry band.
Talon1011 is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 05:52 PM
  #3120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: A320 eff oh
Posts: 277
Default

Originally Posted by echo8015
thread should be re-named to ""speculate the future of atlas""

the earlier posts do a great job with helping guys get hired, now it's getting out of control.
^^^^^^^^^^^ this!
ThrustMonkey is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astropilot92571
Hiring News
6
05-15-2024 01:03 PM
AAL763
Atlas/Polar
112
12-10-2016 04:13 PM
ProceedOnCourse
Hiring News
23
08-16-2009 06:40 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices