Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > Atlas/Polar
Atlas Air Fleet Type differences >

Atlas Air Fleet Type differences

Search

Notices

Atlas Air Fleet Type differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2022, 06:53 PM
  #481  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,633
Default

Originally Posted by HPIC
There’s an entire section in Article 25 that explains how and when they can change your schedule. The very last one in that section is the catch all. Perhaps you should read it.
It's not a catch all because you don't have any contactability requirements. If you have a 7 day layover on your schedule and when you land and there are no changes, you don't have to answer your phone for a week.
You are not ad-hoc reserve because you don't have to answer the phone. You need to check your schedule when you land, and before your pre-duty rest begins.

They can change it all they want, but since you don't have to check it, who cares.
dera is offline  
Old 06-02-2022, 07:23 PM
  #482  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by dera
I am not sure why people seem to age faster on the 747. Looking at the seniority list, most retirements are from that fleet too, so most seem to make it up to 65 just fine.
It is the most relaxing flying out there, great bunk area and long layovers. The 767 right now has more variety, but when you can't rest properly mid-flight, that will definitely take a toll on your body.

I’ve flown on both 747 and 767 fleets. The 74 was far more exhausting, it’s not even close. The last year on the 74 was 740 hours of block versus 218 hours of block on the 76 in ‘21. The Amazon flying is a joke at 1 leg a day in most cases followed by 24-36 hour layover. The JFK 767 guys have longer flights but they spend most of their time in first class positioning for an operating leg. Not uncommon for 12 day patterns with 2 or 3 operating legs for JFK 76 guys. That’s why it’s senior. To each their own but if you like your time at home and family the 74 works way too hard and the jet lag recovery once you finally get home can be rough.
FrancesTheMute is offline  
Old 06-02-2022, 07:32 PM
  #483  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 119
Default

Originally Posted by dera
I am not sure why people seem to age faster on the 747. Looking at the seniority list, most retirements are from that fleet too, so most seem to make it up to 65 just fine.
It is the most relaxing flying out there, great bunk area and long layovers. The 767 right now has more variety, but when you can't rest properly mid-flight, that will definitely take a toll on your body.

I personally haven’t felt the need for a nap on a 2 hour flight.
FrancesTheMute is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 06:22 AM
  #484  
Line Holder
 
Cactus310's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 32
Default

I’m reading how the 747 has the most extensive international flying, best rest area and galley inside.
I’m reading that 767 has a blend of domestic and international.

What is unique about 777 flying though?
Cactus310 is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 10:12 AM
  #485  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,225
Default

Originally Posted by C17B74
As HPIC mentioned and I echoed earlier it was a fleet commonality discussion. Talked to several check folks during these revisions and it’s a dead issue at the moment. Anything is game though here at Atlas. Personally would have rather just ripped off the entire band aid than create phases to achieve commonality. My reasoning was if the right seat was flipping all switches then not being able to taxi was the last straw, time to move left. Just being sarcastic. My early AF days we couldn’t steer from the right. Honestly, no wheel/tiller existed on the right so end of discussion.
This whole fleet commonality holy grail above all else is starting to give me the runs.
Last time I checked we only fly one type at a time unless we go through training and testing and get to fly one other type for at least 18 months.
WTF
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 12:05 PM
  #486  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,225
Default

Originally Posted by C17B74
As HPIC mentioned and I echoed earlier it was a fleet commonality discussion. Talked to several check folks during these revisions and it’s a dead issue at the moment. Anything is game though here at Atlas. Personally would have rather just ripped off the entire band aid than create phases to achieve commonality. My reasoning was if the right seat was flipping all switches then not being able to taxi was the last straw, time to move left. Just being sarcastic. My early AF days we couldn’t steer from the right. Honestly, no wheel/tiller existed on the right so end of discussion.
This whole fleet commonality holy grail above all else is starting to give me a the runs.
Last time I checked we only fly one type at a time unless we go through training and testing and get to fly one other type for at least 18 months.
WTF
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 01:17 PM
  #487  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Position: 777 Left window seat
Posts: 685
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
This whole fleet commonality holy grail above all else is starting to give me a the runs.
Last time I checked we only fly one type at a time unless we go through training and testing and get to fly one other type for at least 18 months.
WTF
The Safety Management System is driving the company back toward Boeing’s recommended procedures. The 747, and especially the 767 (Northwest/Delta procedures), had
drifted away over the years. The guy that formerly ran MIA used to say “Boeing builds airplanes they don’t know how to fly them.” He’s no longer around for various reasons as you are well aware.

Liability is a powerful driving force for a corporation.
Birdsmash is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 02:08 PM
  #488  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,225
Default

Originally Posted by Birdsmash
The Safety Management System is driving the company back toward Boeing’s recommended procedures.

Liability is a powerful driving force for a corporation.
An angle that I had not considered in my initial rant.
Then again I’m sure Ethiopian and Lion Air followed Boeing procedures.
It just feels like change for the sake of change rather then improvements.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 05:39 PM
  #489  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,583
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
An angle that I had not considered in my initial rant.
Then again I’m sure Ethiopian and Lion Air followed Boeing procedures.
It just feels like change for the sake of change rather then improvements.
Yup, this is how it feels. Ideally, i wish the company would have made the transition fully instead of what they did Rev 14…. It didn’t make sense to roll out Rev 14 if the end goal was Boeing procedures at tue end of the day.
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 06-03-2022, 07:52 PM
  #490  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Cactus310
I’m reading how the 747 has the most extensive international flying, best rest area and galley inside.
I’m reading that 767 has a blend of domestic and international.

What is unique about 777 flying though?

Check out the 777 details I posted on page 20. The only Article 33 (premium pay) station we have left is HKG...everything else is still accurate.
newerjguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
verticalspeed
Part 135
5688
10-08-2024 08:16 PM
Dick Steel
Atlas/Polar
131
11-20-2018 05:45 AM
boeingdvr
Atlas/Polar
150
09-12-2018 07:14 PM
vagabond
Foreign
9
07-05-2011 07:09 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 10:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices