Advice to American applicants...
#301
#302
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,527
Among the large airlines where you fit in the hiring curve, and the hiring wave, and the future retirement bubble, might be a better long term better analysis vs a snapshot of a contract that will only be around possibly for 10 or 20% of your career
#304
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
AA has lagged DL and UA for quite a long time. I wouldn't expect that to ever change.
#307
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,527
How about "when has UA and DL had lousy contracts?"
Shoot, or maybe you could answer -
When did LUS have a lousy contract?
When did LUS have a good contract?
What was AA's contract like back then? What decision was better in the long term, LUS with perhaps a good contract or AA with perhaps a bad contract?
Shoot, or maybe you could answer -
When did LUS have a lousy contract?
When did LUS have a good contract?
What was AA's contract like back then? What decision was better in the long term, LUS with perhaps a good contract or AA with perhaps a bad contract?
#309
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
How about "when has UA and DL had lousy contracts?"
Shoot, or maybe you could answer -
When did LUS have a lousy contract?
When did LUS have a good contract?
What was AA's contract like back then? What decision was better in the long term, LUS with perhaps a good contract or AA with perhaps a bad contract?
Shoot, or maybe you could answer -
When did LUS have a lousy contract?
When did LUS have a good contract?
What was AA's contract like back then? What decision was better in the long term, LUS with perhaps a good contract or AA with perhaps a bad contract?
What does any of that have to do with me asking when AA had an ILC? Nice deflection.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post