Search

Notices

SO - Where's the SLI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2016, 06:44 AM
  #751  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: A330
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
http://www.aaflowthrupilots.org
I didn't wanna take the time to read the superior flow through agreements. What are you saying? Your an Eastie what do you support?
Vendetta is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 06:53 AM
  #752  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 431
Default

Originally Posted by Route66
And thats the whole of it. But that is NOT the way the LAA/AWA sides will probably see it. To them its a magnanimous defeat and hence the wardrums of lawsuits are revealing their clouds on the horizon.

Seat belt sign: ON.
I think what you will see with the major objection from LAA will be the lack of influence their "superior" argument carried and as a result the disproportionate impact to the bottom of their list.
Upsddown is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 06:59 AM
  #753  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 431
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Well let's see regarding the present claims;

East vs. West : The primary and really ONLY litmus is the Nicolau award. No Nic, means East clobbers West. Not only that, the reference was West has no access to "East metal". That's the entire fleet, both from sharing in advancement of retirements to narrow body upgrades, through wide body access to include even domicile access absent another mechanism like displacements. I'd call that a clean sweep in that direction (No Nic PLUS no access to ANYTHING on the East).

That was Airmail/Vendatta's claim.

East vs. LAA : S & C benefits LUS greatly over LAA along with another claim East has higher percentage of widebodies vs. LAA, along with the claim that the East are essentially the arbitrators fair-haired boys of favor due to rapid retirements. That benefits the East Nicolau pilots over LAA. "Heavy" LOS weighting decimates junior LAA at the expense of East 3rd listers and even West F/O's. This is all essentially the exact blueprint argument of the East committee in both directions leaving...........well, exactly what do the West and LAA have left to get ?

Oh yeah, they get to keep their jobs.

You to make some great points, but this isn't one of them IMO. Considering the attitude of the arbs toward the East during the West committee inclusion hearings and logic, I'm not buying these claims. Sure, anything is possible in arbitration, but I think this is just tiddlywinks/psyops as should the East end up getting handed their hats, it will be too late to poke anyone in the eye due to sour grapes as this time there is no "end run" play for them to make around the award.
I think you are being to literal in your analysis. But I think you did highlight why the LAA group is so upset. Their junior pilots will take the brunt of the LOS weighting while the top of their list will be mildly impacted only until the older senior LUS pilots soon retire in front of them.
Upsddown is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 07:05 AM
  #754  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by Vendetta
I didn't wanna take the time to read the superior flow through agreements. What are you saying? Your an Eastie what do you support?
I think Eagle flow-throughs should get credit for all their time working at AMR (their Eagle time too).... Not

All the arguments about what we think or support are over (aside from the limited and confidential comments). I now support our contracts that comply with MB and the terms that impliment the list.

Last edited by PurpleTurtle; 07-21-2016 at 07:25 AM.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 07:10 AM
  #755  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: A330
Posts: 173
Default

A guy I used to know as a kid used to be a student of mine,while in Dallas I ran into him and he asked me how the merger would go. I told him similar to ua/co. He got all flustered and visibly upset and mumbled I guess it must... He is forgetting twa and aircal are a thing of the past they no longer have any control
Vendetta is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 07:15 AM
  #756  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: A330
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
I think Eagle flow-throughs should get credit for all their time working at AMR (their Eagle time too).... Not

All the arguments about what we think or support are over (aside from the limited and confidential comments). I now support our contracts that comply with MB and the terms that impliment the list.
You don't support a 10 year crj pilot as that is his length of service? How dare you put him below an 89 hire. I agree completely time on property is it, alpa agreements are void(see nic) after seeing the expectations on here I now know why aapsic and west have immediate lawsuits already filed waiting for the release day. This is gonna be tied up in court a long time and the company will exploit it. You are naive to believe any different .
Vendetta is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 07:21 AM
  #757  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Vendetta
I respect your opinion but you are going to be sorely dissapointed if you really believe that. The original proposal. Places group 4 fo's and west fo's 13,500+ on the list.. I can actually assure you your not close but you will have to wait till August to see what I saw . I get it every group wants there proposal used but even u can't endorse putting west pilots at 14,000 with 11+ years of service with flow throughs superior or not lets be real.
I see a lot of emotion in your post and when I see emotion, I question objectivity which has a close relationship with bias. You need to get over the "superior" BS as that has nothing to do with pilots collectively or individually. That was a concept describing pre-merger equities. Did junior West pilots have Group IV expectations pre-merger or any viable way to achieve them by access to East positions ? I did at LAA at snapshot date. I will not be disappointed as I have limited expectations. I've looked over the 3 lists and done several scenarios both with my LAA seniority based on when it was awarded (grouped with native LAA streeties hired at the same time, some of who were only IN that class because I was withheld) and my longevity based dates of and the divergence is relatively small compared to the total list.

I have no illusions.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 07:22 AM
  #758  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Vendetta
So you support stapling east and west fo's below flow throughs not on the property yet?..
What ?

I have no idea what you are saying. Any flow thru's not on property yet have no AA seniority to staple to.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 07:25 AM
  #759  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Upsddown
I think you are being to literal in your analysis. But I think you did highlight why the LAA group is so upset. Their junior pilots will take the brunt of the LOS weighting while the top of their list will be mildly impacted only until the older senior LUS pilots soon retire in front of them.
That's one opinion. Some at LAA HAVE convinced themselves of that. I don't think that equation will be linear. Some will, some may not as PMCE was different along the bottom 3000 or so on the LAA list.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 07-21-2016, 07:29 AM
  #760  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Position: A330
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
What ?

I have no idea what you are saying. Any flow thru's not on property yet have no AA seniority to staple to.
I admit I don't know much about the bottom but I will simplify I don't believe any east fo or west fo should go below a 3rd lister or flow through on any part
Vendetta is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
55
06-30-2015 11:17 AM
R57 relay
American
150
01-12-2015 07:02 PM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
Airhoss
United
11
07-05-2013 03:34 PM
APC225
United
92
12-22-2012 04:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices