Search

Notices

SO - Where's the SLI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2016, 04:48 AM
  #591  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Route66
You NEVER "told me" that if I "just spills it on here". Go back and look at the posts. You NEVER told me to spill it. I just know from your infantile actions like EF quitting the BOD and the west "sick out" that you DO inherently know (like I do) that the "gist" of the SLI was that the APA/AWA committees are asking for something more and the extension to the 27th was at THEIR request.

You West mouth pieces are full of it but like you DID say and admit.....you WILL be suing and that is typical. So if these THREE ARBITRATORS agree with US then where is the integrity of M/B process? Where is the integrity of the process itself? Who got it wrong: Nicolau or THREE OTHER NEUTRAL ARBITRATORS?

WEST HYPOCRITE LOGIC.
IF and that's IF it's true the West plans post award legal action or attempts it which you insinuate (based on posts of others yet), it might only be based on the fact the Nic wasn't used and any other assumption of East victory outside of that would seem to be baseless. The arbs may very well have compensated for that by other methodologies in placement and order of pilots, at least in relation to pre-merger East/West.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 05:21 AM
  #592  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
IF and that's IF it's true the West plans post award legal action or attempts it which you insinuate (based on posts of others yet), it might only be based on the fact the Nic wasn't used and any other assumption of East victory outside of that would seem to be baseless. The arbs may very well have compensated for that by other methodologies in placement and order of pilots, at least in relation to pre-merger East/West.
From what I have read over on the OTHER forum and from sources on BOTH sides of the fence what I have understood is what someone over on airlineforum posted. I, like you and the others, have not seen "the list". I know the West/LAA are not happy about it. I have NO knowledge of what exactly what the Arbitrators released in the Draft SL. But piecing the puzzle together I do NOT agree that they used ANY relation to pre-merger East/West. In short, if its three lists, its three lists. And that is the conclusion that the many sources I have heard from have deduced. I have HEARD that Eric and Mitch are in very bad moods and that in of itself is a victory.
Route66 is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 05:30 AM
  #593  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Route66
From what I have read over on the OTHER forum and from sources on BOTH sides of the fence what I have understood is what someone over on airlineforum posted. I, like you and the others, have not seen "the list". I know the West/LAA are not happy about it. I have NO knowledge of what exactly what the Arbitrators released in the Draft SL. But piecing the puzzle together I do NOT agree that they used ANY relation to pre-merger East/West. In short, if its three lists, its three lists. And that is the conclusion that the many sources I have heard from have deduced. I have HEARD that Eric and Mitch are in very bad moods and that in of itself is a victory.
The absence of the Nic alone would produce the West unhappiness you describe. As for LAA angst, that could mean any number of things. The East list is a fragmented list anyway with two subgroups of pilots (Nic and 3rd listers) with different issues in relation to other groups pilots. I still think it premature to believe the East prevailed in a grand slam against both West and LAA, especially across the entire seniority spectrum.

I can understand the claim of the West being unhappy being the primary litmus there is Nic/No Nic, but since you say LAA is unhappy, what specifically are they unhappy about ?

If that (or other claims) are to carry any degree of consideration, some type of specifics must be there to quantify that position, otherwise it may just be a series of assumptions playing off each other.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 05:50 AM
  #594  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
The absence of the Nic alone would produce the West unhappiness you describe. As for LAA angst, that could mean any number of things. The East list is a fragmented list anyway with two subgroups of pilots (Nic and 3rd listers) with different issues in relation to other groups pilots. I still think it premature to believe the East prevailed in a grand slam against both West and LAA, especially across the entire seniority spectrum.

I can understand the claim of the West being unhappy being the primary litmus there is Nic/No Nic, but since you say LAA is unhappy, what specifically are they unhappy about ?

If that (or other claims) are to carry any degree of consideration, some type of specifics must be there to quantify that position, otherwise it may just be a series of assumptions playing off each other.
Your term of "Grand Slam" would not be how I got the impression of it. However, in the bits and pieces I have gotten, the COMPLETE DRAFT including the opinion was released to the parties with a time span for comments terminating on the 27th of July (next Wednesday). This time was extended at the request of the West/LAA. The West AND the LAA both argued to use the Nic. It was not used. LAA could very well be unhappy about that alone because its use would have advantaged their argument greatly. You'll disagree, I know, but that WAS their purpose by incorporating it into their argument.

We will have to wait for the draft to be released as its final form which I would anticipate to be the first week of August (opinion on my part) but if the arguments the LAA/AWA committees will probably make along with WD here asserting they'll sue (threats to ARBITRATORS) I'm sure their emotional response to the ARBITRATORS (plural used here as opted to Nicolau) will be to no avail. Time will tell.
Route66 is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 05:57 AM
  #595  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by Route66
You NEVER "told me" that if I "just spills it on here". Go back and look at the posts. You NEVER told me to spill it. I just know from your infantile actions like EF quitting the BOD and the west "sick out" that you DO inherently know (like I do) that the "gist" of the SLI was that the APA/AWA committees are asking for something more and the extension to the 27th was at THEIR request.

You West mouth pieces are full of it but like you DID say and admit.....you WILL be suing and that is typical. So if these THREE ARBITRATORS agree with US then where is the integrity of M/B process? Where is the integrity of the process itself? Who got it wrong: Nicolau or THREE OTHER NEUTRAL ARBITRATORS?

WEST HYPOCRITE LOGIC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Route66
Then unionism is finished, because DOH/LOS is the ONLY way to measure the value of an employee. Historically, (over the past 75 years) merger policy between pilot groups has NOT been a very effective instrument in determining our respective value for many reasons which I have NO interest in delving into here (mainly because we have too much animus between us and web boards simply interfere too much with interpersonal relations) but suffice to say our unity now will be much what it will be in 2020....TOAST.

How will affect me? I can't tell you until the END of my career suffice to say that Im certainly MORE happy the current arbitrators are trying to save their own face and their own futures by realizing that all Pilot lives (like black lives) have SOME value with THEIR longevity.

Have a blessed day!!!


I would be quick to agree if there were two like groups merging into one. The dynamic was such that the two sides were so very lopsided that DOH only benefited the east to an extreme degree. It is for that reason that DOH was not used. To do so would be to essentially staple 90% of one carrier whereby destroying career expectations of that same 90%.
Unity at American I will agree with you it's done. There is too much damage done to too many people all of whom now will pull in different directions. Glad I will miss it all.

I have no idea what the panel has done but clearly you do and there are many here that would pay to know what you have been told to be gospel regarding the confidential results. I say tell it all now and this will force the hand of those that are keeping it confidential to come out with a hotline that much sooner. Based on what you've said so far is that the only group to prevail in this has been LUS east. I have to assume that LUS west and AA have all been stapled behind the east and 3rd list guys and gals. That will certainly produce an undesired action that will put everyone back in a courtroom. Pandora's box had a lid on it for a reason and it read do not open.

WD

This is the problem with people that don't read, they are often quick to accuse without knowing why and it makes them look rather foolish. Yes I did tell you that.

WD
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 06:06 AM
  #596  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

If pilots are not stapled to the nAATive list, MB's importance will be validated. Not a grand slam, just fair and equitable.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 06:12 AM
  #597  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Quote:
Originally Posted by Route66
Then unionism is finished, because DOH/LOS is the ONLY way to measure the value of an employee. Historically, (over the past 75 years) merger policy between pilot groups has NOT been a very effective instrument in determining our respective value for many reasons which I have NO interest in delving into here (mainly because we have too much animus between us and web boards simply interfere too much with interpersonal relations) but suffice to say our unity now will be much what it will be in 2020....TOAST.

How will affect me? I can't tell you until the END of my career suffice to say that Im certainly MORE happy the current arbitrators are trying to save their own face and their own futures by realizing that all Pilot lives (like black lives) have SOME value with THEIR longevity.

Have a blessed day!!!


I would be quick to agree if there were two like groups merging into one. The dynamic was such that the two sides were so very lopsided that DOH only benefited the east to an extreme degree. It is for that reason that DOH was not used. To do so would be to essentially staple 90% of one carrier whereby destroying career expectations of that same 90%.
Unity at American I will agree with you it's done. There is too much damage done to too many people all of whom now will pull in different directions. Glad I will miss it all.

I have no idea what the panel has done but clearly you do and there are many here that would pay to know what you have been told to be gospel regarding the confidential results. I say tell it all now and this will force the hand of those that are keeping it confidential to come out with a hotline that much sooner. Based on what you've said so far is that the only group to prevail in this has been LUS east. I have to assume that LUS west and AA have all been stapled behind the east and 3rd list guys and gals. That will certainly produce an undesired action that will put everyone back in a courtroom. Pandora's box had a lid on it for a reason and it read do not open.

WD

This is the problem with people that don't read, they are often quick to accuse without knowing why and it makes them look rather foolish. Yes I did tell you that.

WD
You ASSUMED I "knew it all". That is NOT what I said. I simply confirmed the basics. The particulars I NEVER said. What I KNOW is what I HAVE CONFIRMED through connections, ACTIONS and simply reading between the lines. The PROBLEM with people that INFER like you and yours is much of the same ole same ole. And in reality even if I DID have "the draft award" do you really think I would release it? If I came out and released ANYTHING particular to the AWARD do you really think the committees would come clean before the ARBITRATORS really released the award? Not hardly and naive at best on your part.

So go get ready to sue. I have to go exercise.
Route66 is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 06:16 AM
  #598  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Route66
Your term of "Grand Slam" would not be how I got the impression of it. However, in the bits and pieces I have gotten, the COMPLETE DRAFT including the opinion was released to the parties with a time span for comments terminating on the 27th of July (next Wednesday). This time was extended at the request of the West/LAA. The West AND the LAA both argued to use the Nic. It was not used. LAA could very well be unhappy about that alone because its use would have advantaged their argument greatly. You'll disagree, I know, but that WAS their purpose by incorporating it into their argument.
Yes, I disagree with the premise the AAPSIC really considered use of the Nic to be their true interest and desire. If that were true, they would have A. adopted it in their initial proposal and B. would NOT have included opposing position on the validity of three separate lists instead of two, even when using the Nic in their revised proposal. IF and that's IF LAA is a part of any delay, it IMO is either slanted toward self-protection in ensuring no subsequent argument can be more successfully made that they want a rush to the process or it is in the interest of the company to which they will not impede or a combination of both.

Originally Posted by Route66
We will have to wait for the draft to be released as its final form which I would anticipate to be the first week of August (opinion on my part) but if the arguments the LAA/AWA committees will probably make along with WD here asserting they'll sue (threats to ARBITRATORS) I'm sure their emotional response to the ARBITRATORS (plural used here as opted to Nicolau) will be to no avail. Time will tell.
I cannot see AAPSIC threatening to sue anyone based on the arbs lack of inclusion of the Nic. They'd look pretty silly considering it was their first proposal and a proposal BTW that can be aptly argued to be more "pure" as to their real position as it was without influence or consideration of what the courts may or may not impose. Personally, I think you are adding 2 and 2 and coming up with 48.3971.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 06:21 AM
  #599  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Quote:
Originally Posted by Route66
Then unionism is finished, because DOH/LOS is the ONLY way to measure the value of an employee. Historically, (over the past 75 years) merger policy between pilot groups has NOT been a very effective instrument in determining our respective value for many reasons which I have NO interest in delving into here (mainly because we have too much animus between us and web boards simply interfere too much with interpersonal relations) but suffice to say our unity now will be much what it will be in 2020....TOAST.

How will affect me? I can't tell you until the END of my career suffice to say that Im certainly MORE happy the current arbitrators are trying to save their own face and their own futures by realizing that all Pilot lives (like black lives) have SOME value with THEIR longevity.

Have a blessed day!!!


I would be quick to agree if there were two like groups merging into one. The dynamic was such that the two sides were so very lopsided that DOH only benefited the east to an extreme degree. It is for that reason that DOH was not used. To do so would be to essentially staple 90% of one carrier whereby destroying career expectations of that same 90%.
Unity at American I will agree with you it's done. There is too much damage done to too many people all of whom now will pull in different directions. Glad I will miss it all.

I have no idea what the panel has done but clearly you do and there are many here that would pay to know what you have been told to be gospel regarding the confidential results. I say tell it all now and this will force the hand of those that are keeping it confidential to come out with a hotline that much sooner. Based on what you've said so far is that the only group to prevail in this has been LUS east. I have to assume that LUS west and AA have all been stapled behind the east and 3rd list guys and gals. That will certainly produce an undesired action that will put everyone back in a courtroom. Pandora's box had a lid on it for a reason and it read do not open.

WD

This is the problem with people that don't read, they are often quick to accuse without knowing why and it makes them look rather foolish. Yes I did tell you that.

WD
If DOH/LOS is the ONLY way to measure the value an employee (i.e. a present "vacuum of choice" for the USAPA/East when considering seniority integration), what would they say if say Envoy or some other regional with hundreds of pilots with 20 or more years were merged with US Airways or some similar situation (even back in 2005 or whenever) ?

I'll bet suddenly the term "superior" would be chanted in their union halls as certainly when considering commuter punks, DOH/LOS would become a much more...........um, shall we say "complex" consideration.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 07-20-2016, 06:40 AM
  #600  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 420
Default Haha!

Credit for your time at Eagle? That's cute!
DarinFred is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
55
06-30-2015 11:17 AM
R57 relay
American
150
01-12-2015 07:02 PM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
Airhoss
United
11
07-05-2013 03:34 PM
APC225
United
92
12-22-2012 04:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices