Search

Notices

SO - Where's the SLI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2016, 12:32 PM
  #461  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A330
Posts: 1,043
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
He did that a long time ago. These two are not of the same mind, but came out with similar things. Interesting, but I don't put much stock in either. Nothing that hasn't already been said.
He was extremely arrogant and I can't stand pompous arrogant female dogs.
DCA A321 FO is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 12:48 PM
  #462  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

If a certain West pilot leaves the APA BOD.. would it be to lead more lawsuits. My unsolicited advice.. Don't buy anymore ties.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 01:04 PM
  #463  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

flyinawa must have missed my question. Any other west pilot?

What's being said on the AWAPPA board?
R57 relay is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 01:05 PM
  #464  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
If a certain West pilot leaves the APA BOD.. would it be to lead more lawsuits. My unsolicited advice.. Don't buy anymore ties.
Doesn't he recuse himself from BOD duties since he is on the west committee and designate a DDR?
R57 relay is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 01:12 PM
  #465  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Doesn't he recuse himself from BOD duties since he is on the west committee and designate a DDR?
Yes, others have posted that he does designate a DDR on any BOD meeting about the SLI, but not other meetings. I personally hope he does not resign from the BOD. He is a very good influence (except for maybe that one issue with a returning pilot who had been out on medical).
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 01:24 PM
  #466  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
Yes, others have posted that he does designate a DDR on any BOD meeting about the SLI, but not other meetings. I personally hope he does not resign from the BOD. He is a very good influence (except for maybe that one issue with a returning pilot who had been out on medical).

Interesting. Well, only a few weeks of guessing and rumors to go!
R57 relay is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 01:59 PM
  #467  
Weekend workaholic
 
flyinawa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 669
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
The east is trying to raise money to fund it's merger committee. You guys got all the USAPA funds frozen. And that other small lawsuit that I don't think is going anywhere.

Same question as cacti...I mean easdof-would you support a west lawsuit if you don't get the Nic?
I would absolutely NOT support trying to fight the arbitrated award. While the West was not a party to the creation of the SLI protocol, I think by earning the right to become an involved party after the fact, acceptance of the the process was established. I personally don't think the process itself is unreasonable or unfair, although the attempt at "status quo" was singularly inserted in an attempt to tank the Nic and it was not removable after the fact. I'm not sure there is any true footing to that argument but we'll just have to see how the Arbs interpret it. There is no means to dispute the award, only the process, and I think the goal has been to create an iron-clad, process driven end result. That's why they allowed the West to have an independent committee and they patiently tolerated all the USAPA shenanigans that occurred early on.

On the other hand, it's my personal feeling is the East committee will immediately try to delay whatever result occurs because they have been very successful with the delay philosophy so far. I think that's why their USAPA committee walked out...they wanted to pre-load the "we didn't get a fair chance to argue" issue so they can attempt to implicate the process. I'm not sure they will get the chance because the massive benefit the company enjoyed as a result of the East - West delays no longer exist after single FOS. I really can't grasp how Kirby managed to get list release delayed until August but I think it closes as much of the door as possible on a delay. I think we'll be enjoying each others company in the cockpit very soon regardless of who thinks they should be senior to who. I'm honestly looking forward to it. (Edit Even if it means I'll be swinging gear for Relay

Last edited by flyinawa; 07-14-2016 at 02:25 PM.
flyinawa is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 02:25 PM
  #468  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by flyinawa
I would absolutely NOT support trying to fight the arbitrated award. While the West was not a party to the creation of the SLI protocol, I think by earning the right to become an involved party after the fact, acceptance of the the process was established. I personally don't think the process itself is unreasonable or unfair, although the attempt at "status quo" was singularly inserted in an attempt to tank the Nic and it was not removable after the fact. I'm not sure there is any true footing to that argument but we'll just have to see how the Arbs interpret it. There is no means to dispute the award, only the process, and I think the goal has been to create an iron-clad, process driven end result. That's why they allowed the West to have an independent committee and they patiently tolerated all the USAPA shenanigans that occurred early on.

On the other hand, it's my personal feeling is the East committee will immediately try to delay whatever result occurs because they have been very successful with the delay philosophy so far. I think that's why their USAPA committee walked out...they wanted to pre-load the "we didn't get a fair chance to argue" issue so they can attempt to implicate the process. I'm not sure they will get the chance because the massive benefit the company enjoyed as a result of the East - West delays no longer exist after single FOS. I really can't grasp how Kirby managed to get list release delayed until August but I think it closes as much of the door as possible on a delay. I think we'll be enjoying each others company in the cockpit very soon regardless of who thinks they should be senior to who. I'm honestly looking forward to it.
Personally, I would never donate a dime for attempts to delay what we have agreed to. I won't speculate what other pilots (or pilot groups) will or won't do, but it's a free country and lawyers love to bill.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 02:40 PM
  #469  
Weekend workaholic
 
flyinawa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 669
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
flyinawa must have missed my question. Any other west pilot?

What's being said on the AWAPPA board?
I actually considered PM-ing you a screenshot of the AWAPPA board (That's the AWA pilot's web board for those who don't know). The is NO discussion at all of what do as a result of the award because no one who has seen the award will even hint at the result. For the most part, the members of the committee haven't posted AT ALL, even on topics that have nothing to do the integration.
flyinawa is offline  
Old 07-14-2016, 03:35 PM
  #470  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by flyinawa
I would absolutely NOT support trying to fight the arbitrated award. While the West was not a party to the creation of the SLI protocol, I think by earning the right to become an involved party after the fact, acceptance of the the process was established. I personally don't think the process itself is unreasonable or unfair, although the attempt at "status quo" was singularly inserted in an attempt to tank the Nic and it was not removable after the fact. I'm not sure there is any true footing to that argument but we'll just have to see how the Arbs interpret it. There is no means to dispute the award, only the process, and I think the goal has been to create an iron-clad, process driven end result. That's why they allowed the West to have an independent committee and they patiently tolerated all the USAPA shenanigans that occurred early on.

On the other hand, it's my personal feeling is the East committee will immediately try to delay whatever result occurs because they have been very successful with the delay philosophy so far. I think that's why their USAPA committee walked out...they wanted to pre-load the "we didn't get a fair chance to argue" issue so they can attempt to implicate the process. I'm not sure they will get the chance because the massive benefit the company enjoyed as a result of the East - West delays no longer exist after single FOS. I really can't grasp how Kirby managed to get list release delayed until August but I think it closes as much of the door as possible on a delay. I think we'll be enjoying each others company in the cockpit very soon regardless of who thinks they should be senior to who. I'm honestly looking forward to it. (Edit Even if it means I'll be swinging gear for Relay
Thanks for that and I agree with a lot of it. I don't see the east committee trying to delay. One reason is that they only have about half the money they need now.(If you are an east pilot and haven't sent any money, please do it now).

I've flown with one guy that is involved with the current suit and, if I understood him correctly, he doesn't even give it good odds. I've heard no support for legal action over here.

I'll take your word on the AWAPPA board, no screen shot necessary.
R57 relay is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
55
06-30-2015 11:17 AM
R57 relay
American
150
01-12-2015 07:02 PM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
Airhoss
United
11
07-05-2013 03:34 PM
APC225
United
92
12-22-2012 04:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices