SO - Where's the SLI?
07-13-2016, 05:45 PM
#421
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 90
[QUOTE=eaglefly;2160961]
McCaskill-Bond's purpose is to ensure a fair process. It is based on Allegheny-Mohawk provisions section 3 and 13 which provide for negotiations and if no agreement, binding arbitration. That's all. There are no guarantees of X result as both "fair" and "equitable" almost always mean different things to each party. Nicolau reiterated that when he said that the various proposals presented rarely meet the standard that arbitrators end up adopting.
As for the nonsensical and irrelevant babbling about what you're taught at a regional airline in indoc, that is of no concern here. I have difficulty believing an airline is wasting valuable indoc training time teaching McCaskill-Bond or Seniority Integration 101. With a fresh arrival and these 5 posts, I think you're out where the busses don't run, but your ridiculous assertions do serve a purpose of expanding on things others might find useful.
Once again, eaglefly, your superior grasp of the SLI landscape shines above all. Understanding its historical framework as demonstrated by your mentioning Allegheny-Mohawk provisions section 3 and 13 really puts you a cut above and makes what you say here vitally relevant. Clearly, this is what 8200 postings on just this one forum is capable of producing: razor sharp reasoning and cutting insight.
So, I'll keep at it with the "ridiculous assertions" and you keep doing that thing you do, expanding and explaining and providing those insights that only an experienced Internet forum member can. Hats off to you, Sir. (I don't wear my hat anyway
and I carry a backpack.)
McCaskill-Bond's purpose is to ensure a fair process. It is based on Allegheny-Mohawk provisions section 3 and 13 which provide for negotiations and if no agreement, binding arbitration. That's all. There are no guarantees of X result as both "fair" and "equitable" almost always mean different things to each party. Nicolau reiterated that when he said that the various proposals presented rarely meet the standard that arbitrators end up adopting.
As for the nonsensical and irrelevant babbling about what you're taught at a regional airline in indoc, that is of no concern here. I have difficulty believing an airline is wasting valuable indoc training time teaching McCaskill-Bond or Seniority Integration 101. With a fresh arrival and these 5 posts, I think you're out where the busses don't run, but your ridiculous assertions do serve a purpose of expanding on things others might find useful.
So, I'll keep at it with the "ridiculous assertions" and you keep doing that thing you do, expanding and explaining and providing those insights that only an experienced Internet forum member can. Hats off to you, Sir. (I don't wear my hat anyway
and I carry a backpack.)
07-13-2016, 06:04 PM
#422
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
[QUOTE=Saul Rosenberg;2160983]
Once again, eaglefly, your superior grasp of the SLI landscape shines above all. Understanding its historical framework as demonstrated by your mentioning Allegheny-Mohawk provisions section 3 and 13 really puts you a cut above and makes what you say here vitally relevant. Clearly, this is what 8200 postings on just this one forum is capable of producing: razor sharp reasoning and cutting insight.
So, I'll keep at it with the "ridiculous assertions" and you keep doing that thing you do, expanding and explaining and providing those insights that only an experienced Internet forum member can. Hats off to you, Sir. (I don't wear my hat anyway and I carry a backpack.)
By all means, knock yourself silly.
Once again, eaglefly, your superior grasp of the SLI landscape shines above all. Understanding its historical framework as demonstrated by your mentioning Allegheny-Mohawk provisions section 3 and 13 really puts you a cut above and makes what you say here vitally relevant. Clearly, this is what 8200 postings on just this one forum is capable of producing: razor sharp reasoning and cutting insight.
So, I'll keep at it with the "ridiculous assertions" and you keep doing that thing you do, expanding and explaining and providing those insights that only an experienced Internet forum member can. Hats off to you, Sir. (I don't wear my hat anyway
and I carry a backpack.)
07-13-2016, 07:11 PM
#423
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 90
07-13-2016, 10:32 PM
#424
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 373
What's the point of bookmarking you. Let me guess, you predicted DOH on the last one..... under a different screen name of course. My advice.....start thinking about your new one.
07-14-2016, 12:20 AM
#425
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
PT, you are like a brotha from anotha mutha! Hells yeah the NIC was F&E!!!!! When Republic figures out a way around this pilot shortage and we start making mad stacks o cash again, we will rise up and NIC all y'all's sorry *** flabby long haul butts! NIC was da man, and DOH is DOA!!! The arbs knows it, and the eagles knows it, and....and....*BURRRRRRRP* ..... I better call in sick tomorrow
The Nic, though F&E, remained impotent (instead of implemented) due to a verbal conundrum. The new MB list won't suffer such humiliation.
07-14-2016, 04:45 AM
#427
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
07-14-2016, 05:08 AM
#428
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
07-14-2016, 05:23 AM
#429
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Not even close. A friend of mine never got high when he smoked pot (in Denver, of course), because he didn't inhale. He was free to inhale if he wanted to.
Contracts are a wonderful thing. The BOA is free to use the Nic if they want to! After all, under the previous contract it was F&E!
For $10 and a F&E list, you can get a cup of coffee and a cookie at Starbucks!
Contracts are a wonderful thing. The BOA is free to use the Nic if they want to! After all, under the previous contract it was F&E!
For $10 and a F&E list, you can get a cup of coffee and a cookie at Starbucks!
07-14-2016, 05:37 AM
#430
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Not even close. A friend of mine never got high when he smoked pot (in Denver, of course), because he didn't inhale. He was free to inhale if he wanted to.
Contracts are a wonderful thing. The BOA is free to use the Nic if they want to! After all, under the previous contract it was F&E!
For $10 and a F&E list, you can get a cup of coffee and a cookie at Starbucks!
Contracts are a wonderful thing. The BOA is free to use the Nic if they want to! After all, under the previous contract it was F&E!
For $10 and a F&E list, you can get a cup of coffee and a cookie at Starbucks!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
