SO - Where's the SLI?
09-06-2016, 05:53 AM
#2032
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
09-06-2016, 05:55 AM
#2033
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 CAPT
Posts: 93
The East Pilots, by a narrow margin, created a new collective bargaining agent. Whose purpose was proven to evade or delay the implementation of the Nicolau Seniority List.
You might better ask: What if the US Air pilots had stayed with ALPA, finished the joint contract and abided by thier agreement....How much more money, time off and contract improvements would they have realized?
The problem with these arguments is that no matter how much testimony, documentation, and proof provided here.... the USAPA-faithful scream from the mountain tops that they did nothing wrong, there would NEVER have been a contract that the body would have accepted with the Nicolau, and that they have won.
Here's another question: If DOH was the "gold standard", WHY was it abandoned for relative seniority (like we argued in 2006)...EVEN THOUGH there was only ONE AIRLINE & ONE CERTIFICATE?
09-06-2016, 05:58 AM
#2034
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 CAPT
Posts: 93
If you say so. Is there then anything desperate about a person posting 10-25 year old videos, 30 year old news stories, and quoting some sort of blog from someone that doesn't matter?
09-06-2016, 06:07 AM
#2035
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 CAPT
Posts: 93
Page 45. The court did not find you innocent of your debauchery, it stated it was a state court issue. Fishbowl for 10 years, not worth titaniums status or ties that bound you. I hear mitch vasilino who is an angry reserve f/o for 10 years is still one reserves, tsk, tsk.
http://cactus18.typepad.com/the_cact...iles/final.pdf
http://cactus18.typepad.com/the_cact...iles/final.pdf
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion to
Dismiss of Defendants AWAPPA, McIlvenna, Vasin, Blandino, Ferguson, Koontz, and Payne [Doc. 42] and the Motion to Dismiss by Individual Defendants Eric Auxier, David Braid, Al Casby, Christopher Cundari, Larry Diehl, Ron Gabaldon, Bruce A. Hannah, Keith Krueger, Robert J. Narloch, Shawn Metzker, CJ Szmal, Kevin Steele, and Jack Tooke, and Joinder in Case
Motion to Dismiss Filed by AWAPPA Defendants [Doc. 77] are GRANTED to the extent that Counts One and Two of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Because the federal claims asserted by the Plaintiff have been
dismissed, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiff’s state-law claims (Counts Three through Eleven) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367(c)(3), and accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend First Amended Verified Complaint [Doc. 80] is DENIED as futile.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent that the Motion to Dismiss by the Individual Defendants [Doc. 77] seeks dismissal of these Defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, such Motion is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 63] is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
As Forrest Gump said...."Jenny, I'm not a smart man...but I do know what a SMACK DOWN is.." Dismiss of Defendants AWAPPA, McIlvenna, Vasin, Blandino, Ferguson, Koontz, and Payne [Doc. 42] and the Motion to Dismiss by Individual Defendants Eric Auxier, David Braid, Al Casby, Christopher Cundari, Larry Diehl, Ron Gabaldon, Bruce A. Hannah, Keith Krueger, Robert J. Narloch, Shawn Metzker, CJ Szmal, Kevin Steele, and Jack Tooke, and Joinder in Case
Motion to Dismiss Filed by AWAPPA Defendants [Doc. 77] are GRANTED to the extent that Counts One and Two of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Because the federal claims asserted by the Plaintiff have been
dismissed, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiff’s state-law claims (Counts Three through Eleven) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1367(c)(3), and accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend First Amended Verified Complaint [Doc. 80] is DENIED as futile.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent that the Motion to Dismiss by the Individual Defendants [Doc. 77] seeks dismissal of these Defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, such Motion is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [Doc. 63] is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
09-06-2016, 06:16 AM
#2036
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 431
No one knows for sure. If it's being delayed based on waiting on Letter T pilots then they will have the final count on Thursday (September 8). Depending on how long it takes them to verify, implement and proof the final list, my "guess" would be no earlier than this Friday (9) and no later than Friday next week (16).
Other than that, I'm out of "guesses".
Other than that, I'm out of "guesses".
09-06-2016, 06:22 AM
#2037
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 2,224
No one knows for sure. If it's being delayed based on waiting on Letter T pilots then they will have the final count on Thursday (September 8). Depending on how long it takes them to verify, implement and proof the final list, my "guess" would be no earlier than this Friday (9) and no later than Friday next week (16).
Other than that, I'm out of "guesses".
Other than that, I'm out of "guesses".
09-06-2016, 06:24 AM
#2038
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 90
Ooooo....Ooooo! I know the answer to this one! But I'll wait for CactusBoy to give his usual thoughtful response, because it will be far more informative.
09-06-2016, 06:25 AM
#2039
New Hire
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 4
No one knows for sure. If it's being delayed based on waiting on Letter T pilots then they will have the final count on Thursday (September 8). Depending on how long it takes them to verify, implement and proof the final list, my "guess" would be no earlier than this Friday (9) and no later than Friday next week (16).
Other than that, I'm out of "guesses".
Other than that, I'm out of "guesses".
Upsddown, now that we've reached the last class start date for the returnees, I think your very plausible scenario will eventually be revealed as the reason for the delay in the SLI release. I'm still not clear on why attendance can't be determined until Thurs, though. Wasn't everyone required to show up this morning?
09-06-2016, 06:38 AM
#2040
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 90
Yeah, if you have any power or pull with the makers of those videos, you might want to see what can be done. They don't reflect well on the profession. (waiting....waiting....cue in lecture on what Eastholes have done to the entire profession and, and, and.....)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
