SO - Where's the SLI?
09-04-2016, 05:26 AM
#1951
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 194
No court has ever required anyone to use the Nic. Never.
If any court had indeed required the Nic to be used by anybody for anything, then it would have been used. They never did, and they never will. Any pleadings to the court to force use of the Nic would be a waste of money, but I fully expect there will be some lawyers (Summit law school graduates) convincing some Westies to waste more money very soon.
If any court had indeed required the Nic to be used by anybody for anything, then it would have been used. They never did, and they never will. Any pleadings to the court to force use of the Nic would be a waste of money, but I fully expect there will be some lawyers (Summit law school graduates) convincing some Westies to waste more money very soon.
09-04-2016, 05:29 AM
#1952
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
The BOA does not live in the Leonidas Land of "IFs".
The BOA lives in the land of reality, the reality of contracts and status quo. Protocol Agreement.. Dec 2013.. Three committees.. Three lists.
It's not complicated unless you are too emotional to be objective.
09-04-2016, 05:36 AM
#1953
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 194
And the 9th ordered only 2 lists be brought by usapa, a signatory to the PA, are you to dumb to understand that simple ruling?
09-04-2016, 05:37 AM
#1954
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
They placed an **injunction** on USAPA. An **injunction** does not require anyone to do anything. The 9th did not order USAPA to do anything.
The status quo was three committees and three lists. It's not complicated.
09-04-2016, 05:44 AM
#1955
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
The 9th did not order USAPA to do anything at all. The court placed a contingent restriction upon USAPA if they chose to continue participating in the MB arbitration. USAPA chose not to continue participating in MB, and thus the 9th injunction became moot.
The only thing of relevance left from the 9th was the specific opinion that the BOA was free to ignore the Nic.
Status quo. Three committees. Three lists. It's not complicated.
09-04-2016, 05:55 AM
#1956
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 194
The 9th did not order USAPA to do anything at all. The court placed a contingent restriction upon USAPA if they chose to continue participating in the MB arbitration. USAPA chose not to continue participating in MB, and thus the 9th injunction became moot.
The only thing of relevance left from the 9th was the specific opinion that the BOA was free to ignore the Nic.
Status quo. Three committees. Three lists. It's not complicated.
The only thing of relevance left from the 9th was the specific opinion that the BOA was free to ignore the Nic.
Status quo. Three committees. Three lists. It's not complicated.
09-04-2016, 06:01 AM
#1957
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
That was their punishment for what the 9th saw as it's breach of it's DFR. But they also said that even without that breach, the Nic might not have seen the light of day and refused to order it's use.
Do you really think the courts didn't think USAPA would just pull out? Silver saw them do it and still didn't do anything about it.
You have a history of getting locked on a notion only to find out it was wrong. I don't know if you will be wrong this time, we'll see soon.
Do you really think the courts didn't think USAPA would just pull out? Silver saw them do it and still didn't do anything about it.
You have a history of getting locked on a notion only to find out it was wrong. I don't know if you will be wrong this time, we'll see soon.
09-04-2016, 06:06 AM
#1958
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
So the DFR of preventing the Nic be triggered by jcba never happened? An injunction, is an order. Usapa was ordered to only present the Nic. in sli. The arbs are fully aware that usapa changed their name again to avoid the 9th's ruling. Like I said its up to the BOA to decide wether or not it's appropriate to reward the east pilots for what they have done.
The BOA is integrating the status quo. Three lists. Three committees. No injunction on any committee. No injunction on the BOA. The courts are not putting a thumb on the BOA scale. It's not complicated! It just isn't.
09-04-2016, 06:09 AM
#1959
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
