Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
West Merger Committee 12/4 update >

West Merger Committee 12/4 update

Search

Notices

West Merger Committee 12/4 update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2015, 10:46 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
We weren't talking about the final list. That post was the 3 different mergers that happened and the actual S&C used in each merger that the arbitrators decided. It was obviously posted to show the starting point for what each committee is asking for.

You point that it was a "lie" because that wasn't the final list is ridiculous because that's not what that was showing.

Each of those were cut and pasted from the actual awards that the arbitrators wrote. They certainly aren't "lies" as you claim.
Actually it is a lie, because as you keep stating yourself, the final list had UAL furloughs put above CAL pilots.
404yxl is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 10:54 AM
  #52  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
Actually it is a lie, because as you keep stating yourself, the final list had UAL furloughs put above CAL pilots.
It wasn't the final list. It was the S&C order. Which was correct. Everyone on here understands that apparently except for you.
svergin is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 11:00 AM
  #53  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
It wasn't the final list. It was the S&C order. Which was correct. Everyone on here understands that apparently except for you.
Did the final list have UAL furloughs put above active CAL pilots or not?
404yxl is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 11:35 AM
  #54  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Eaglefly doesn't realize Freund proposal is exactly what he believes the list will look like. He isn't trying to "game" anything, as a matter of fact the west proposal is the only one devoid of any political influences. This is the way Freund works exclusively, he wouldn't of taken the west case if we didn't agree to work this way.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 11:59 AM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
You're gonna need all the luck you can get.
Considering the AAPSIC's blunder of adopting the Nicolau when not even the 9th did, yes, LAA pilots are at an unfortunate disadvantage IMO. We certainly don't have your supposed Messiah of Arbitrations, but then again, good arbitrators will craft their award on the facts of the particular case, not the blinding bling that any committees team tries to blind everyone with, your new desert homies included.

In a PROPERLY done arbitration, "luck" should be nowhere to be found in the process.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 12:07 PM
  #56  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Eaglefly doesn't realize Freund proposal is exactly what he believes the list will look like. He isn't trying to "game" anything, as a matter of fact the west proposal is the only one devoid of any political influences. This is the way Freund works exclusively, he wouldn't of taken the west case if we didn't agree to work this way.
Incorrect (as usual). Eaglefly does realize it is what Freund "believes" it will look like. The undeniable result though is a meteoric windfall for the West considering their pre-merger equities.

Meteoric.

A fundamental foundation of any SLI is a process that ensures no one group obtains a windfall and most especially at the expense of another. IF............and that's IF the arbitrators elect to use the pure Nic, LAA pilots, especially those junior should not be railroaded out of their pre-merger equities. Read the UAL/CAL award. Pre-merger considerations ARE a component, yet this time around Freund considers them unquantifiable and suggests they shouldn't be considered at all. I still believe the pure Nic will not be adopted as it skews the list too much.

Considering the West's pre-merger position which is undeniable, I don't blame him for embracing his beliefs and deflecting the painful realities of pre-merger West pilot position. But, I understand it frustrates you when those not dazzled by Freund's bling question his tactics and conclusions.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 12:21 PM
  #57  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Incorrect (as usual). Eaglefly does realize it is what Freund "believes" it will look like. The undeniable result though is a meteoric windfall for the West considering their pre-merger equities.

Meteoric.

A fundamental foundation of any SLI is a process that ensures no one group obtains a windfall and most especially at the expense of another. IF............and that's IF the arbitrators elect to use the pure Nic, LAA pilots, especially those junior should not be railroaded out of their pre-merger equities. Read the UAL/CAL award. Pre-merger considerations ARE a component, yet this time around Freund considers them unquantifiable and suggests they shouldn't be considered at all. I still believe the pure Nic will not be adopted as it skews the list too much.

Considering the West's pre-merger position which is undeniable, I don't blame him for embracing his beliefs and deflecting the painful realities of pre-merger West pilot position. But, I understand it frustrates you when those not dazzled by Freund's bling question his tactics and conclusions.
The west's equities are all the lus equities and you need to come to grips with that, your merger committee did.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 01:48 PM
  #58  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
The west's equities are all the lus equities and you need to come to grips with that, your merger committee did.
......and they made compensations for using it, which YOU need to come to grips with. Obviously, that has been very difficult for you.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 02:29 PM
  #59  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
......and they made compensations for using it, which YOU need to come to grips with. Obviously, that has been very difficult for you.
Not difficult at all. I realize the "compensations" were done for political cover, not what is a realistic proposal.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 12-07-2015, 02:52 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Captain B-737
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Considering the AAPSIC's blunder of adopting the Nicolau when not even the 9th did, yes, LAA pilots are at an unfortunate disadvantage IMO. We certainly don't have your supposed Messiah of Arbitrations, but then again, good arbitrators will craft their award on the facts of the particular case, not the blinding bling that any committees team tries to blind everyone with, your new desert homies included.

In a PROPERLY done arbitration, "luck" should be nowhere to be found in the process.
Let me guess. You'll be the judge of what determines "properly Done". Sorry but that's the Arbitrators job, not yours. Nicolau was flawless. Your agreement is not necessary.
EskimoJoe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
41
06-29-2015 06:37 PM
R57 relay
American
150
01-12-2015 07:02 PM
cactiboss
American
18
01-09-2015 09:15 PM
Arado 234
American
694
10-04-2014 05:49 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices