West Merger Committee 12/4 update
#51
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
We weren't talking about the final list. That post was the 3 different mergers that happened and the actual S&C used in each merger that the arbitrators decided. It was obviously posted to show the starting point for what each committee is asking for.
You point that it was a "lie" because that wasn't the final list is ridiculous because that's not what that was showing.
Each of those were cut and pasted from the actual awards that the arbitrators wrote. They certainly aren't "lies" as you claim.
You point that it was a "lie" because that wasn't the final list is ridiculous because that's not what that was showing.
Each of those were cut and pasted from the actual awards that the arbitrators wrote. They certainly aren't "lies" as you claim.
#52
UCH Pilot
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
#53
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
#54
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Eaglefly doesn't realize Freund proposal is exactly what he believes the list will look like. He isn't trying to "game" anything, as a matter of fact the west proposal is the only one devoid of any political influences. This is the way Freund works exclusively, he wouldn't of taken the west case if we didn't agree to work this way.
#55
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Considering the AAPSIC's blunder of adopting the Nicolau when not even the 9th did, yes, LAA pilots are at an unfortunate disadvantage IMO. We certainly don't have your supposed Messiah of Arbitrations, but then again, good arbitrators will craft their award on the facts of the particular case, not the blinding bling that any committees team tries to blind everyone with, your new desert homies included.
In a PROPERLY done arbitration, "luck" should be nowhere to be found in the process.
In a PROPERLY done arbitration, "luck" should be nowhere to be found in the process.
#56
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Eaglefly doesn't realize Freund proposal is exactly what he believes the list will look like. He isn't trying to "game" anything, as a matter of fact the west proposal is the only one devoid of any political influences. This is the way Freund works exclusively, he wouldn't of taken the west case if we didn't agree to work this way.
Meteoric.
A fundamental foundation of any SLI is a process that ensures no one group obtains a windfall and most especially at the expense of another. IF............and that's IF the arbitrators elect to use the pure Nic, LAA pilots, especially those junior should not be railroaded out of their pre-merger equities. Read the UAL/CAL award. Pre-merger considerations ARE a component, yet this time around Freund considers them unquantifiable and suggests they shouldn't be considered at all. I still believe the pure Nic will not be adopted as it skews the list too much.
Considering the West's pre-merger position which is undeniable, I don't blame him for embracing his beliefs and deflecting the painful realities of pre-merger West pilot position. But, I understand it frustrates you when those not dazzled by Freund's bling question his tactics and conclusions.
#57
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Incorrect (as usual). Eaglefly does realize it is what Freund "believes" it will look like. The undeniable result though is a meteoric windfall for the West considering their pre-merger equities.
Meteoric.
A fundamental foundation of any SLI is a process that ensures no one group obtains a windfall and most especially at the expense of another. IF............and that's IF the arbitrators elect to use the pure Nic, LAA pilots, especially those junior should not be railroaded out of their pre-merger equities. Read the UAL/CAL award. Pre-merger considerations ARE a component, yet this time around Freund considers them unquantifiable and suggests they shouldn't be considered at all. I still believe the pure Nic will not be adopted as it skews the list too much.
Considering the West's pre-merger position which is undeniable, I don't blame him for embracing his beliefs and deflecting the painful realities of pre-merger West pilot position. But, I understand it frustrates you when those not dazzled by Freund's bling question his tactics and conclusions.
Meteoric.
A fundamental foundation of any SLI is a process that ensures no one group obtains a windfall and most especially at the expense of another. IF............and that's IF the arbitrators elect to use the pure Nic, LAA pilots, especially those junior should not be railroaded out of their pre-merger equities. Read the UAL/CAL award. Pre-merger considerations ARE a component, yet this time around Freund considers them unquantifiable and suggests they shouldn't be considered at all. I still believe the pure Nic will not be adopted as it skews the list too much.
Considering the West's pre-merger position which is undeniable, I don't blame him for embracing his beliefs and deflecting the painful realities of pre-merger West pilot position. But, I understand it frustrates you when those not dazzled by Freund's bling question his tactics and conclusions.
#58
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
#59
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Captain B-737
Posts: 290
Considering the AAPSIC's blunder of adopting the Nicolau when not even the 9th did, yes, LAA pilots are at an unfortunate disadvantage IMO. We certainly don't have your supposed Messiah of Arbitrations, but then again, good arbitrators will craft their award on the facts of the particular case, not the blinding bling that any committees team tries to blind everyone with, your new desert homies included.
In a PROPERLY done arbitration, "luck" should be nowhere to be found in the process.
In a PROPERLY done arbitration, "luck" should be nowhere to be found in the process.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post