Search

Notices

Boom!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2015, 04:40 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by Monkeyfly
Hey maybe the membership will get so mad they'll quit the union... and join ALPA!
When monkeys fly out of your rear. As screwed up as the APA is, I'll take them any day over ALPA. And I voted for ALPA in the USAPA/ALPA election!
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 04:43 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Plus, I have to laugh at the AA proposal. Where they might actually have had some constructive input that could in fact influence the arbitrators, they have chosen a path that the arbitrators will simply ignore. They are doing absolutely nothing to help their case. Perhaps, as some have suggested, this is a political move to protect the future of APA by insuring the loyalty of a majority of AA pilots, but either way it is sheer insanity, and a sad testament to the selfishness of pilot politics.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 04:44 PM
  #83  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox

P.S. Cactiboss, I look forward to offering you a "High Five" when it's all over. I'm only sad that the USAir pilots were able to hinder the West's careers for so long, and never admitted that they were saved from a Pan Am, TWA, or Eastern fate by a stroke of luck.
Thanks. It's important to recognize the east pilots didn't just hinder west careers, they cost the combined pilot group over $600 million, they harmed every other airline pilot in this country by voluntarily working for less than market rate and destroying pattern bargaining . They will be remembered as absolute scum of the industry in the next flying the line.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 04:45 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
I just puked.

Do you have any clue, any, of what made up the majority of the new US Airways?

Actually I have a VERY clear picture of the last USAirways Annual Report. Which part would you like me to start quoting first . . .


You were headed for the graveyard in a most expeditious fashion, and that fact is simply not accepted by all East pilots and there in lies your tormented existence.

Pan Am pilots thought they ruled the world. They flew 747s.

Just because your "fleet" had big planes and great routes doesn't mean your corporation was viable. Pan AM, Eastern, TWA, and Braniff all had great fleets and routes.

i know . . . I know . . . you were just about to "turn the corner" . . .

We can speculate from here to eternity, but THAT is why an independent arbitrator put a 17 year pilot behind a new hire.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 04:51 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Thanks. It's important to recognize the east pilots didn't just hinder west careers, they cost the combined pilot group over $600 million, they harmed every other airline pilot in this country by voluntarily working for less than market rate and destroying pattern bargaining . They will be remembered as absolute scum of the industry in the next flying the line.

I was trying to be "politic", but I couldn't have said it better. Send me a PM someday. I'd love to buy you a beer somewhere sometime!
Sunvox is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 04:53 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
Actually I have a VERY clear picture of the last USAirways Annual Report. Which part would you like me to start quoting first . . .


You were headed for the graveyard in a most expeditious fashion, and that fact is simply not accepted by all East pilots and there in lies your tormented existence.

Pan Am pilots thought they ruled the world. They flew 747s.

Just because your "fleet" had big planes and great routes doesn't mean your corporation was viable.

i know . . . I know . . . you were just about to "turn the corner" . . .

We can speculate from here to eternity, but THAT is why an independent arbitrator put a 17 year pilot behind a new hire.
Did we go to the boneyard? A yes or no will do.

Do you have AWA's? Where they made about 30 million in 2003, after 70 million in federal aid? Or 2004 where they lost money?

You don't know jack.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 05:00 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sunvox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Did we go to the boneyard? A yes or no will do.

Do you have AWA's? Where they made about 30 million in 2003, after 70 million in federal aid? Or 2004 where they lost money?

You don't know jack.

Actually i do know Jack. He was our house sitter for a year while we lived in Oregon, but then I digress.

The fact that AWA was not perfect is irrelevant. USAirways was not a viable carrier on their own. If you are not willing to accept that fact so be it, but intelligent folks, including the arbitrators presented with ALL the facts at that time disagreed with your memory of history. So either they are wrong or you are wrong.

Based on my reading of the annual report, YOU are wrong. USAirways was not a viable business at the time of the merger, but you will never accept that fact because you have far too much emotion invested in your opinion. I'm sorry I can't fix your pain.
Sunvox is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 05:34 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by Sunvox
Actually i do know Jack. He was our house sitter for a year while we lived in Oregon, but then I digress.

The fact that AWA was not perfect is irrelevant. USAirways was not a viable carrier on their own. If you are not willing to accept that fact so be it, but intelligent folks, including the arbitrators presented with ALL the facts at that time disagreed with your memory of history. So either they are wrong or you are wrong.

Based on my reading of the annual report, YOU are wrong. USAirways was not a viable business at the time of the merger, but you will never accept that fact because you have far too much emotion invested in your opinion. I'm sorry I can't fix your pain.
You talk about your house sitter, but don't answer my questions.

Neither airline was viable. The US/AW merger made two also-rans into a profitable major, putting it in line for the AA merger. Period. So says the guy running the largest airline in the world.

Again, did you read any AWA annual reports? The 2004 one is very interesting. Do you know who raised the money that funded the AW/US merger and paid off the ATSB loans, at a profit to the US government?
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 06:15 PM
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A330
Posts: 1,043
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay

Neither airline was viable. The US/AW merger made two also-rans into a profitable major, putting it in line for the AA merger. Period. So says the guy running the largest airline in the world.

Again, did you read any AWA annual reports? The 2004 one is very interesting. Do you know who raised the money that funded the AW/US merger and paid off the ATSB loans, at a profit to the US government?
R57, everything you said is factual but after nine years you are not gonna change the minds of guys with blinders on.
DCA A321 FO is offline  
Old 09-21-2015, 06:40 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by DCA A321 FO
R57, everything you said is factual but after nine years you are not gonna change the minds of guys with blinders on.
The guys with blinders on are not the reason I post. You should see my email inbox.
R57 relay is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
swaayze
American
9
12-04-2012 04:52 PM
Beertini
Cargo
6
04-14-2010 03:58 PM
Planespotta
Hangar Talk
0
02-22-2010 10:29 PM
Jetjock65
Regional
59
03-19-2008 05:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices