Search

Notices

En Banc Denied!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2015, 07:00 PM
  #241  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 321
Default

Do you guys ever consider the possibility that Purple Turtle is just trying to wind you up? I wouldn't be surprised if he isn't even an Airways pilot.
Laker24 is offline  
Old 09-07-2015, 09:59 PM
  #242  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Btw, here is the language the west is asking Silver for:
USAPA, APA, and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order are hereby enjoined from taking any action on behalf of legacy US Airways East pilots in the McCaskill-Bond proceedings, including any seniority-related discussions leading up to those proceedings, except to the extent that they advocate the Nicolau Award.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 06:49 AM
  #243  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Btw, here is the language the west is asking Silver for:
Did you hear Laker24?

Key words, asking for. When did a court ever give AOL the wording they asked for?

I think these things will come up.

"Nevertheless, we also recognize that it is not certain whether the Nicolau Award would have been implemented fully but for USAPA’s breach. Because a good faith attempt to implement the Nicolau Award would have ultimately required a ratification vote by all the pilots, and we cannot know what the results of such a vote would have been, we can never be certain whether efforts to implement the Nicolau Award through a collective bargaining agreement with US Airways would have succeeded."

"Although there remains some ambiguity over whether the Nicolau Award would have been adopted in toto..."

"We decline to order the issuance of the West Pilots’ requested injunction
“that an unmodified Nicolau Award must be used to order the seniority of the East and West pilots in the pending McCaskill-Bond process.”"

I think the odds are in your favor cacti. You've been wrong for so long, it's time to be right about something. From your mood on here I think the win in the 9th was a shock to you.

There is some irony to the west pilots requesting the APA be enjoined in this. It was the APA that gave the west pilot a committee. A few LAA pilots wailed about USAPA having the money to sue them. Now, it's AOL that will control the money and they are threatening to sue if they don't get their way. Ah, you can't make this stuff up.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 08:12 AM
  #244  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
The west is not claiming the APA has breached dfr, just warning the APA not to go down that road. The mere act of asking for a new east committee outside the pa can be seen as disadvantage to the west. The enjoinment of the apa to the 9th's ruling is necessary to both protect and restrain the apa. Once enjoyned the apa is free and clear of any east claim they weren't represented fairly and it allows the 9th's ruling to flow to the east committee which legally is an APA committee.
No, I think the point of all this is to CONTROL others. Ostensibly, not just the East, but now clearly APA and if that is successful, you're that much closer to controlling the arbitrators, at least in the West's belief. The West would prefer the East not be represented AT ALL and thus it reverses the situation the West complained about. In that case or if the East pilots (not USAPA) are required to advocate the Nic, the East argues for the West against their will and interests.

Sorry, personally, I cannot buy that as any component of a fair process.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 08:15 AM
  #245  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,967
Default

Damn eaglefly. How much time do you spend online?
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 08:26 AM
  #246  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Btw, here is the language the west is asking Silver for:
Yup. COMPLETE control over not just any East committee, but now the APA and I think once Leo has his fangs in the APA along with whomever they send such an order too (I assume at their discretion), they force the arbitrators to not "reorder" a pre-merger seniority list that never existed in reality, instead previously being an unconsummated hypothetical. This is where this strategy is likely leading, that being (and LAA pilots here take note !) if this is successful, you can be sure part of the West's revised proposed ISL will include arguments and outright demands that since no premerger seniority list has ever been internally reordered, to do so with the NEW pre-merger LUS list would be improper and if done to the new LUS pre-merger list (based on the pure Nic by all pre-merger LUS), then the pre-merger LAA list should be reordered as well.*

*This is but one aspect of the previous tangent conversation I had with Upsddown regarding "longevity" application as a wildcard that can go in unanticipated directions and how the AE flows are now vulnerable in ways that no other stated LAA subgroup is (like native AA furloughees) considering the language of AAPSIC's initial SLI proposal regardiing who IS specifically mentioned concerning longevity and who is NOT mentioned.

Again, it's clear to me that Leo wants to get his blunt snout into the arbitrators tent flap to use as a foundation that completely redefines the pre-merger realities and logic to their metrics and this Lion is attempting to be very aggressive and cunning in pursuit of its prey, that being not just East pilots, but LAA too, just in a roundabout way that is not yet evident to many.

Last edited by eaglefly; 09-08-2015 at 08:47 AM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 08:27 AM
  #247  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
Damn eaglefly. How much time do you spend online?
A very small portion of my day, considering online technology. The last post took about 3 minutes or so to type. Cacti and the tortoise are here just as much, yet I notice you don't make the same inquiry of them ?

But, we all know (or should) criticism can be born of selective perception.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 09:08 AM
  #248  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,967
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
A very small portion of my day, considering online technology. The last post took about 3 minutes or so to type. Cacti and the tortoise are here just as much, yet I notice you don't make the same inquiry of them ?

But, we all know (or should) criticism can be born of selective perception.
I just find it funny all of you are arguing in depth over things totally out of your control. I think the arbitrators already have the list completed.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 10:24 AM
  #249  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
I just find it funny all of you are arguing in depth over things totally out of your control. I think the arbitrators already have the list completed.
Well, I'm glad you're entertained.

Anyhow, if arbitrators were to complete lists even before testimony, I see little point in hearings and written submission would be all that's required. I find it funny some actually think all the facts are in and the list is already complete.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 11:38 AM
  #250  
Gets Summer Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: AA
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Well, I'm glad you're entertained.

Anyhow, if arbitrators were to complete lists even before testimony, I see little point in hearings and written submission would be all that's required. I find it funny some actually think all the facts are in and the list is already complete.
It's certainly not set in stone, but I'd agree they have a pretty good rough draft going.
Surprise is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Al Czervik
American
10
07-16-2015 02:10 PM
Good Beer
Cargo
162
07-04-2013 07:02 AM
misterwl
American
2
08-16-2012 03:22 PM
misterwl
Union Talk
0
08-16-2012 02:19 PM
EatMyPropwash
Career Questions
23
06-11-2012 09:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices