Usapa update 1/17 RE: arbitration
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: recalled until the next round of right sizing to optimise synergies
Posts: 199
oh man, this is rich. So you believe extremely experienced arbitrators will just say a merger never happened even though all usairways pilots work under a single certificate, single union and single management. The best part to come is when USAPA argues against the west, the very people they represented, tough spot to be in Sioux torpedoing their own expectations.
The West having their own committee requires that the East only represents the East.
#82
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Having been here for 2 years, I'm ok with AA furloughs going above me. It is the 3rd listers who have been here for 5-6 years that are arguing for AA furloughs with less than 2 years active employment to go below them.
Not all 3rd listers are created equal, don't group us all together (in this case).
Not all 3rd listers are created equal, don't group us all together (in this case).
#83
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
oh man, this is rich. So you believe extremely experienced arbitrators will just say a merger never happened even though all usairways pilots work under a single certificate, single union and single management. The best part to come is when USAPA argues against the west, the very people they represented, tough spot to be in Sioux torpedoing their own expectations.
#84
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Of course a merger happened, but what didn't happen was a combined contract and the resulting combined seniority list, they were separate up to and including now. That is the argument for the arbitrators.
The West having their own committee requires that the East only represents the East.
The West having their own committee requires that the East only represents the East.
#85
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
We've beaten this like a rented mule. Not all integration issues are identical and not all issues in THiS integration automatically take a back seat to the Nicolau situation. I can understand from your POV though that the sun rises, sets and was itself born of the Nic and I know that will never change even AFTER this SLI, just as the TWA debacle never has. I'm sure it will be the last thought through your mind as your heart takes its final beat.
#86
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Having been here for 2 years, I'm ok with AA furloughs going above me. It is the 3rd listers who have been here for 5-6 years that are arguing for AA furloughs with less than 2 years active employment to go below them.
Not all 3rd listers are created equal, don't group us all together (in this case).
Not all 3rd listers are created equal, don't group us all together (in this case).
I realize that's an attractive position to want to be in, but I think that would easily make "windfall" status. Since no pre-merger list can be reordered (as to do so would destroy the concept of any given pilots pre-merger career expectations) and pre-merger career expectations will definitely be a major factor in consideration, I don't see much chance of such a situation occurring as desirable as it may be. I can see a how a 2009 East pilot would like to jump 2500 AA pilots right off the bat though. Couple that with whacking the West and no Nicolau and a 2009 3rd lister could theoretically have 3500 or more pilots junior to him in the final ISL (2500 AA, 500 East and maybe 500+ on the West which is more then half their F/O list).
Personally, considering these philosophies obviously in play, I'm liking the idea of just fencing off pre-merger AA and U in entirety for perhaps 7-10 years. I don't see how anyone could argue with that. It's the one certain way ALL pilots would follow their pre-merger paths and rights with the only open issue then, how to resolve the Nic on the U side.
#87
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Because your logic fails at every turn. It especially fails if you look at ual/cal and f9/republic decisions. "single corporate control" is the determiner of "career expectations", not a scab unions machinations. Your own opinion here that "constructive notice" determines things is proof of how wrong you are as awa/us have a constructive notice of 9/2005.
#88
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Yes they each hinge on their own issues as well as "single corporate control" which you completely discount. Think about how swrdrvr doesn't think there will be a widebody fence between east/west, how can that be if we have separate career expectations? Again doesnt pass the simple logic test.
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 405
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post