Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Usapa update 1/17 RE: arbitration >

Usapa update 1/17 RE: arbitration

Search

Notices

Usapa update 1/17 RE: arbitration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2015, 04:58 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
I'm demonstrating to you the absurdity of the east argument and how that was perceived by the pab, I have no doubt the SLI arbs will see it the same way.
I agree as far as an East argument of such. The problem arises when the LAA committee proposes a model that doesn't include the pure Nic. The arbitrators will know the LAA committee isn't arguing against the Nic itself and thus it will be all but impossible for them to apply the same criticism they might to the East. The LAA committee has a responsibility only to LAA pilots and provided they are arguing a fair and equitable position that has merit, the arbitrators will not unduly penalize them for making it. In other words, the LAA committee isn't tethered to the Nic or any issue surrounding it. That is for the East and West to attempt and accept risk or reward for.

This is a 3-way arbitration, not a 2-way one only centered around a dispute involving the unconsummated Nicolau award. Again, it's my belief that ultimately NONE of the 3 proposed integration models submitted to the arbitrators will be adopted in pure form and that means an arbitrator crafted hybrid award, which means the pure Nic will not be included.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 05:31 PM
  #42  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
I agree as far as an East argument of such. The problem arises when the LAA committee proposes a model that doesn't include the pure Nic. The arbitrators will know the LAA committee isn't arguing against the Nic itself and thus it will be all but impossible for them to apply the same criticism they might to the East. The LAA committee has a responsibility only to LAA pilots and provided they are arguing a fair and equitable position that has merit, the arbitrators will not unduly penalize them for making it. In other words, the LAA committee isn't tethered to the Nic or any issue surrounding it. That is for the East and West to attempt and accept risk or reward for.

This is a 3-way arbitration, not a 2-way one only centered around a dispute involving the unconsummated Nicolau award. Again, it's my belief that ultimately NONE of the 3 proposed integration models submitted to the arbitrators will be adopted in pure form and that means an arbitrator crafted hybrid award, which means the pure Nic will not be included.
You sure it's going to be a 3 way?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 05:51 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Done with that
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
A panel of very experienced arbitrators soundly rejected every argument made by the east. That won't change for the next arb.
BUT that does not mean they will use the NIC. Several ways this could go. They might combine the US side (maybe using NIC or modified NIC, or no NIC) first before combining with AA. Or they might combine each list on its own. Point is no one knows yet. If I were to give a guess, I would expect them to combine each list concurrently. The West was given a seat with their list. Three list for a reason. Use it that way. That does not exclude the West from East WB flying. No fence there. Not much of a much, but just a little arbitrator jab at the East.
SewerPipeDvr is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 05:51 PM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
You sure it's going to be a 3 way?
There are 3 committees, yes ?

I assume you're implying the West's position will be that the arbitrators must first rule on the Nic. I would expect that the arbitrators will decline to do so, but take that request under advisement in crafting their award. Since one committee (representing a clear majority of involved pilots) may have model(s) that involve a valid fair and equitable argument for consideration that does not include the Nic, it would be unfair to prevent them from consideration prior to all issues to be considered so as to craft a final award. Again, I understand the West will demand the world stop until the Nic is first decided and THEN the SLI continue, but I don't believe that will occur. The Nic WILL get consideration, but it will not be implemented first effectively preventing at least consideration of other potentially valid model(s).
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 06:02 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Done with that
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Separate ops now and made, what.......6 Billion this year ?

Moot point though. Any effort by USAPA for another end run around what they don't like will be futile.
Now for the interesting point. Note USAPA is not directly challenging the arbitration. This is Federal Arbitration. The only legal avenue would be to file with the same board. It cannot be taken to Federal Court. Federal rules stand. USAPA is trying an end run by arguing for the Silver/ Ninth COAs. Trying to reverse a Federal Arbitration in-directly. That is why they chose counsel. He knows MB. But he won't beat RLA. East will fail their attempt. Novel approach, but they are skating on thin ice with a CBA interference injunction. The SLI will proceed, everything will be in place and USAPA will just have to live with it. As I said earlier, if Parker wants this settled, the big money will win. Expect a legal attack that will kill off the remnants of USAPA. Big money owns politics. Parker and the owners have the big money. Do the math.
SewerPipeDvr is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 06:03 PM
  #46  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by SewerPipeDvr
BUT that does not mean they will use the NIC. Several ways this could go. They might combine the US side (maybe using NIC or modified NIC, or no NIC) first before combining with AA. Or they might combine each list on its own. Point is no one knows yet. If I were to give a guess, I would expect them to combine each list concurrently. The West was given a seat with their list. Three list for a reason. Use it that way. That does not exclude the West from East WB flying. No fence there. Not much of a much, but just a little arbitrator jab at the East.
They will be the new "Nicolau". You betting on a 3 way as of 12/13? Or are you betting on a 3 way from 2005?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 06:05 PM
  #47  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
There are 3 committees, yes ?

I assume you're implying the West's position will be that the arbitrators must first rule on the Nic. I would expect that the arbitrators will decline to do so, but take that request under advisement in crafting their award. Since one committee (representing a clear majority of involved pilots) may have model(s) that involve a valid fair and equitable argument for consideration that does not include the Nic, it would be unfair to prevent them from consideration prior to all issues to be considered so as to craft a final award. Again, I understand the West will demand the world stop until the Nic is first decided and THEN the SLI continue, but I don't believe that will occur. The Nic WILL get consideration, but it will not be implemented first effectively preventing at least consideration of other potentially valid model(s).
They will consider everything, including the "intent" of SLI arbitration mr Nicolau presided over.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 07:31 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
Eventually, you and your bud R57 are going to have to swallow the medicine.
Can I get cherry? I really don't like grape flavor.

If I don't get my full dose will you be mad forever?
R57 relay is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 07:36 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by GrapeNuts
The SLI arbitration will occur as scheduled, without interruption, regardless of what you easties attempt.
You must have missed the latest crew news. SLI is now predicted for 2016 because the arbitrators have pushed back on the compressed timeline.

Hang in there.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 01-18-2015, 07:44 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by SewerPipeDvr
Or they might combine each list on its own. Point is no one knows yet. If I were to give a guess, I would expect them to combine each list concurrently. The West was given a seat with their list. Three list for a reason. Use it that way. That does not exclude the West from East WB flying. No fence there. Not much of a much, but just a little arbitrator jab at the East.
That's my guess, and since we are one company you could be right about the widebodies. Who knows.
R57 relay is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wiskey Driver
American
6
02-28-2014 01:23 PM
cactiboss
American
35
09-03-2013 06:27 AM
cactiboss
Major
55
07-21-2008 10:42 PM
cactiboss
Mergers and Acquisitions
25
06-20-2008 05:10 PM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
0
02-18-2008 06:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices