Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Usapa update 1/17 RE: arbitration >

Usapa update 1/17 RE: arbitration

Search

Notices

Usapa update 1/17 RE: arbitration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2015, 08:51 AM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by Spoiler
My only question is this:
How can MB be applied retroactively to the East West issue? I am prone to think that has to be resolved first and then MB applied to the LAA and LUS merge.
Unless of course those parties agree to drop the NIC and allow MB to be applied.
I think that we agreed to let it be applied retroactively by voting in the MOU.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 10:10 AM
  #142  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Uhhh, I'm an august '98 hire and I'm a group 3 captain.
How many Group III captains positions are available on the West side in relation to the number of pilots vs. the LAA side ?

Again, these are simply issues that will have to be confronted and there is almost certain to be three different opinions. No one knows how the arbitrators will weigh this or other issues.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 10:14 AM
  #143  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Again how the LUS pilots are slotted are of no concern to the pilots of AA just like how the AA pilots are slotted are of no concern to LUS pilots. Now what is of a concern to everyone is how LUS and AA are slotted but that is it my friend.

WD at AWA
We obviously disagree about the Nics pure inclusion. The only difference between us is that apparently I'm willing to say its possible I'll be wrong. The slotting of LUS pilots IS of concern here my friend, but I think claiming you speak for those at LAA or the LAA merger committee is simply something that is desire and not fact.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 10:25 AM
  #144  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by FreighterGuyNow
The cross over would have occurred in roughly 2021 when 1200 legacy US Airways pilots would equal 1200 legacy America West ones.

So no, most of the East list will not be gone in 7 years and no (again) the West was never going to " rule " .
Ok, I'll concede 6 years and the term "most" IS simply the point where the West could have a majority even if by 1 pilot over the East. I never said the West would rule with certainty, just that I agreed it is then POSSIBLE to gain control of the union and do a reverse of what East majority rule has accomplished in the last 10 years.

Originally Posted by FreighterGuyNow
The East list is static at 3500 the West at 1400 yielding a 2021 demographic of 1200/ 1200 legacy and 2600 post merger hires who would, assuming a cohesive voting block, be the largest contingent.
2600 post merger hires that might vote on maintaining the status quo of separate divisions or agreeing to the Nic and finally combining the pilots. Since the Nic has little to no negative impact on them (in fact, just the opposite in your future scenario), I would argue in that situation, it is even MORE likely the West would see the Nic as the newer pilots would see more benefit of one seniority list as opposed to two.

Last edited by eaglefly; 01-22-2015 at 10:37 AM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 10:29 AM
  #145  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by flyinawa
Shhhhh. Why use facts when the crew room "I heard" gossip is so much more fun to spread? It's become like Good Morning America. Way more entertainment than news.
Remember too that if it's not something the West approves of, it's not true. Likewise for the East.

There are no such things as facts, only perception.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 10:36 AM
  #146  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Spoiler
My only question is this:
How can MB be applied retroactively to the East West issue? I am prone to think that has to be resolved first and then MB applied to the LAA and LUS merge.
Unless of course those parties agree to drop the NIC and allow MB to be applied.
All McCaskill-Bond provides is a fair process. The fairness (at least as far as the three recognized parties interests are concerned) has now been met by virtue of each party gaining the ability to present their position and what they believe to be supporting facts of that position. That's all. Any one of the parties can put forth any position on their list as opposed to the others. Of course, it is at their own jeopardy as well as benefit, so there's a cautious line to walk there. The other aspect is that neutral arbitrators will decide.

There is no requirement for the arbitrators to segment the arbitration to some type of preliminary award like the Nic and then restart the arbitration to then integrate with LAA, although I can see that would be attractive to the West. Now, as stated above, they can certainly make that request and quite frankly, I believe they will do just that. Personally, I don't see that occurring though and believe they will take it under consideration when they adjourn to craft their final ISL.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 10:55 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 405
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
he slotting of LUS pilots IS of concern here my friend.
As well it should be.

the dead last bottom F/O on the West list was furloughed when the merger was announced.

Under the Nic, he is 300 numbers senior to the bottom East A-320 Captain.

So A we slot a bottom East Captain ( who actually holds the job ) with the bottom American Captain on the S- 80 in Dfw - netting our intrepid Bottom West F/O 300 numbers up the American Captain list.

Or B we slot our bottom West F/O in with the American F/O list which forces hundreds of East Captains junior to all the American and America West First Officers.

That is the Nic and I, for one, am happy to have a 3 merger commitee poo fling just for the show.
FreighterGuyNow is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 11:15 AM
  #148  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by FreighterGuyNow
As well it should be.

the dead last bottom F/O on the West list was furloughed when the merger was announced.

Under the Nic, he is 300 numbers senior to the bottom East A-320 Captain.

So A we slot a bottom East Captain ( who actually holds the job ) with the bottom American Captain on the S- 80 in Dfw - netting our intrepid Bottom West F/O 300 numbers up the American Captain list.

Or B we slot our bottom West F/O in with the American F/O list which forces hundreds of East Captains junior to all the American and America West First Officers.

That is the Nic and I, for one, am happy to have a 3 merger commitee poo fling just for the show.
As I stated, I disagree with this "slotting" as it demonstrates how the Nic has the ability to expand windfalls such as this to then infect the LAA side. With 3 lists, a more fair and EQUITABLE result is more easily obtained. Again, just my opinion. IF the arbitrators use the Nic, it requires more effort and complexity to mitigate this windfall from metastasis to LAA pilots and is more in-line with upholding the concept of pre-merger career expectations.

Clearly, many West pilots here disagree though and believe that all aspects of this 3-way SLI come second to their pure Nic beliefs and interests.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 11:22 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 405
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
As I stated, I disagree with this "slotting" as it demonstrates how the Nic has the ability to expand windfalls such as this to then infect the LAA side. With 3 lists, a more fair and EQUITABLE result is more easily obtained. Again, just my opinion. IF the arbitrators use the Nic, it requires more effort and complexity to mitigate this windfall from metastasis to LAA pilots and is more in-line with upholding the concept of pre-merger career expectations.

Clearly, many West pilots here disagree though and believe that all aspects of this 3-way SLI come second to their pure Nic beliefs and interests.
Agreed in totality.

Give it a week until the voting JCBA ends n everyone turns attentions to this .......
FreighterGuyNow is offline  
Old 01-22-2015, 11:42 AM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
We obviously disagree about the Nics pure inclusion. The only difference between us is that apparently I'm willing to say its possible I'll be wrong. The slotting of LUS pilots IS of concern here my friend, but I think claiming you speak for those at LAA or the LAA merger committee is simply something that is desire and not fact.
Help me to understand your position of how LUS slotting is of any concern to AA pilots and should I be concerned about how AA is slotted?

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wiskey Driver
American
6
02-28-2014 01:23 PM
cactiboss
American
35
09-03-2013 06:27 AM
cactiboss
Major
55
07-21-2008 10:42 PM
cactiboss
Mergers and Acquisitions
25
06-20-2008 05:10 PM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
0
02-18-2008 06:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices