Originally Posted by eaglefly

They can argue anything they want just as any of them. Arguing and obtaining are two different things. As I said, the West is now at TOGA for the Nic as it's now or never. Perhaps that's why one of Leo's supposed hired guns has arrived with pistols drawn.

Originally Posted by cactiboss

From AOL:
.........

Originally Posted by cactiboss

From AOL:
.........

Originally Posted by cactiboss

Quote:





Originally Posted by eaglefly


Will the arbitrators put the interests of this 1700 as a top priority at the expense of the massive majority ?

.




So the other side of the coin is, will the arbitrators punish 1700 pilots careers to benefit a group that held itself hostage?

Originally Posted by eaglefly

After reading his last post, I know all I need or want to know about alfaromeo. But, if your insinuation is that he will be a supporting player on the West NC (should they even be activated), it makes all the more sense about his near rabid rebuttal to my opinions. My only advice to him is to hopefully do a bit better at reading and understanding others and a little less emotion and attack.

He (or anyone else) certainly doesn't have to agree with me, but he didn't convince me of anything other then the West is committed to quashing any opposing argument of the Nic (let's face it.........it's really all on the line now and it's now or never). I doubt his threats against "deep pockets" AAG and the APA will gain any more traction with them then they did with me. I'm sure those entities are lawyered up to the max with a high priority of successfully defending themselves against the West or Leo should the Nic die on the vine.

Originally Posted by Piklepausepull

Not to be snarky, but do you remember the old "When E.F. Hutton speaks......" ads, where everybody stops to listen?

I can tell you for a fact that when Alfaromeo speaks, the arbitrators listen VERY intently!

And, they take his advice to heart!

I don't know what the arbs' will decide, but Aromeo could very well influence their decision, if he were to be asked to "join in".

He tends to get a little "grumpy" when you "poke" him though!

Originally Posted by Piklepausepull

Not to be snarky, but do you remember the old "When E.F. Hutton speaks......" ads, where everybody stops to listen?

I can tell you for a fact that when Alfaromeo speaks, the arbitrators listen VERY intently!

And, they take his advice to heart!

I don't know what the arbs' will decide, but Aromeo could very well influence their decision, if he were to be asked to "join in".

He tends to get a little "grumpy" when you "poke" him though!

Originally Posted by Piklepausepull

Not to be snarky, but do you remember the old "When E.F. Hutton speaks......" ads, where everybody stops to listen?

I can tell you for a fact that when Alfaromeo speaks, the arbitrators listen VERY intently!

And, they take his advice to heart!

I don't know what the arbs' will decide, but Aromeo could very well influence their decision, if he were to be asked to "join in".

He tends to get a little "grumpy" when you "poke" him though!

Originally Posted by eaglefly

Well, if "E.F. Hutton" joins in the arbitration, the arbitrators consider his "advice" to be their decision and the Nic results, so be it. Personally, what credibility am I supposed to give someone who starts off admonishing me about avoiding "personal tangents", then goes on that tangent himself, then subsequently tells me to stop giving legal advice when I have not only not given legal advice. I've given no "advice" at all ?

In addition to that, all I read from E.F. was a rehash of what Leo has been arguing as their position all along and so far it seems E.F. Hutton hasn't been very effective if he's been invited to give holy advice to anyone.