Search

Notices

Nic ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2014, 09:02 AM
  #451  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by ackattacker
No. Only that the Nic list was constructed using the seniority order as it existed at that time.

I'll try to provide a concrete example, although there are many possible scenarios.

Let's say, for example, that you are sitting in the right seat during a particular inflight emergency and become semi-famous. You decide to take a personal leave of absence to better explore the opportunities fame presents. You continue to accrue seniority for 12 months, but then seniority accrual *stops* per the contract and people start passing you on the seniority list.

So, your relative position on the East list is now *changed* from when the Nicolau list was created. People who where junior to you, are now senior to you. If you went back and used the Nicalau, it would put you back as senior to those folks who passed you. Hardly fair. So, the only way to correct that is to recompute the Nic list using the Nicolau methodology but with the East list as it currently exists... make sense?

Now, I'm sure one could come up with all kinds of calculations to "fix" these problems... but that's hardly the purview of a West Merger Committee to state exactly how they should be "fixed". It becomes part of the negotiations... and no longer is the Nicolau list!
Ok, that wasn't the Nic award per se that resulted in leapfrogging, that was one pilots desire to exercise his contractual rights in the hope of capitalizing on his water ballet opportunity in the Hudson and in so doing, at some point chose to forgo seniority accrual. His seniority would likely be modified on the separate East list as that is what the CBA requires. Actually, the West could make any argument they want out of that in reference to the Nic, but again since that would be fully divulged by the other parties in the pilot information exchange phase (just as it would be for pilots on all lists), absent agreement about this pilots situation (or any similar pilots), the arbitrators would decide their slotting.

I don't think you can use unusual situations that exist on any of the lists that are in play to then claim that list doesn't exist. That would be a strawman argument. The Nic list is the originally awarded list and should any modification be required as a result of unusual situations like this (rare), the arbitrators would decide regardless of whatever argument whatever party chooses to supply absent agreement.

I suppose this pilots dream of a sitcom or detective series didn't pan out, but it's a choice HE made, not Nicolau and his adjustment on the East list or Nicolau in this case would be clearly justified.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 09:05 AM
  #452  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,967
Default

A civil debate on a thread called Nic. There's hope for us! Bravo guys. Bra-vo.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 09:13 AM
  #453  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Will the arbitrators put the interests of this 1700 as a top priority at the expense of the massive majority ?

.
So the other side of the coin is, will the arbitrators punish 1700 pilots careers to benefit a group that held itself hostage?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 09:13 AM
  #454  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by LIOG41
So when do The parties sit down and negotiate a list? Or is it going straight to arbitration?
First complete exchange of pilot info, then the parties MAY start negotiations on the defined identification and classification issues of the pilots on their lists and can negotiate on these issues for 45 days (but who knows they will ACTUALLY start). This will only occur right now between APA and USAPA. It will take months to resolve the JCBA which must be resolved first and then actual arbitration will commence on integration ASAP after that. In the interim, the West merger committee issue will be resolved so that by the time the JCBA is complete, the West issue will have been ruled on by arbitrators and then either 2 or 3 merger committees will proceed to throw fruit at each other for 12 days in front of the arbitration panel. Once they run out of fruit or the 12 days are up (whichever occurs first), then the arbitrators begin to contstruct their final list.

I think it will be very close to the 12/9/15 deadline before a final list is awarded and presented to the company.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 09:20 AM
  #455  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
So the other side of the coin is, will the arbitrators punish 1700 pilots careers to benefit a group that held itself hostage?
Yep, that's the other side of the coin. My belief is that IF the Nic is used, it will just result in a complicated fence system (it would seem to have to) to not punish 10,000 AA pilots for placing a premium on protecting what careers 1700 West pilots felt they were cheated out of and it's a question APA can't (and won't) take responsibility for and thus the requirement for BOTH arbitrations in the PA.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 09:32 AM
  #456  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Yep, that's the other side of the coin. My belief is that IF the Nic is used, it will just result in a complicated fence system (it would seem to have to) to not punish 10,000 AA pilots for placing a premium on protecting what careers 1700 West pilots felt they were cheated out of and it's a question APA can't (and won't) take responsibility for and thus the requirement for BOTH arbitration's in the PA.
It would not punish one single American pilot. You discount that it's 1700 pilots within a group of 15000, you also discount the 340 aircraft usairways brings. The relative position of American pilots won't be affected one iota by using nic. order.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 09:55 AM
  #457  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
It would not punish one single American pilot. You discount that it's 1700 pilots within a group of 15000, you also discount the 340 aircraft usairways brings. The relative position of American pilots won't be affected one iota by using nic. order.
I'm afraid most AA pilots will disagree and it would be wise to assume that whatever position APA takes, it won't be for a pure Nic inclusion either. Again, I see you're arguing that you are really one pilot group and one airline and I get that argument and had that come to fruition, we wouldn't be disagreeing about anything, but the fact is your operations and lists are indeed separate and absent the merger, there was no light at the end of the tunnel of that changing.

Sure, our present relative seniority wont be changed, but the Nic would give fast access to pre-merger AA Group III and even Group IV flying by pilots who previous pre-merger career expectations maxed out flying narrowbody equipment for $80-$130/hour (or thereabouts) out of one domicile. Considering the various placement of West pilots on the Nic list, I can see a lot of windfall opportunity at the expense of pre-merger AA pilots using the pre-merger Nic and absent fences, I have difficulty seeing that outcome. This SLI consideration will also consider compensation as a factor, both at the time of merger (U pilots based on their pre-merger contracts) and future (also based on those contracts). So, one of the many questions for the arbitrators is, is a pre-merger $85/hour job (narrowbody F/O) in PHX worth as much or even more then a $135/hour job (767 F/O) in MIA ?

Should the Nic be allowed to potentially place that $85/hour (pre-merger) West PHX pilot ahead of that $135/hour (pre-merger) AA MIA pilot without some form of mitigator to prevent what would be a windfall ?

You can make even more of an argument in the captain's compensation discrepancy dept regarding the same comparison and asking the same question. Again, and it's just my opinion, pre-merger career expectation based on the actual state of pilots at their pre-merger carriers is the most significant factor in avoiding windfalls.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 10:02 AM
  #458  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
but the Nic would give fast access to pre-merger AA Group III and even Group IV flying by pilots who previous pre-merger career expectations maxed out flying narrowbody equipment for $80-$130/hour (or thereabouts) out of one domicile. Considering the various placement of West pilots on the Nic list, I can see a lot of windfall opportunity at the expense of pre-merger AA pilots .
Again, those airplanes will be fenced, the only group IV airplanes the west would be able to bid into for a number of years would the aircraft usairways brings, no American positions would be touched. I am glad you bring up pay and total compensation as a factor. Every group 2 phx pilot has out earned and had vastly better benefits than the east pilots flying the same aircraft, should the arbitrators take that in consideration guess what they end up with?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 10:32 AM
  #459  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Every group 2 phx pilot has out earned and had vastly better benefits than the east pilots flying the same aircraft,
Not sure that's quite accurate. Of course the West doesn't have 330's which paid more and the 757 paid more on the East. But for the Group II, up until just a few years ago, when the attrition started ramping up, almost ALL the FO's on the East Group II aircraft were top of scale pay. My guess is that there was nowhere near the same percentage of West FO's making top of scale pay...
algflyr is offline  
Old 09-20-2014, 10:32 AM
  #460  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hueypilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: B737
Posts: 1,204
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
It would not punish one single American pilot. You discount that it's 1700 pilots within a group of 15000, you also discount the 340 aircraft usairways brings. The relative position of American pilots won't be affected one iota by using nic. order.
Not that it matters in the grand scheme of things, but we have a few AA pilots in my Reserve unit, and we talk about this stuff from time to time. None of them view the Nic award as "fair". Not that they have any love for USAPA, but I'm not sure how far the west will get with trying to use the Nic list.
Hueypilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TWA4ME
American
44
07-22-2014 06:37 PM
algflyr
American
108
06-25-2014 11:03 AM
Errbus
American
233
01-30-2014 10:44 AM
R57 relay
American
222
01-17-2014 02:17 PM
cactiboss
Major
447
01-09-2012 07:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices