Search

Notices

Nic ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2014, 01:58 PM
  #351  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Placing the usairways pilots in nicolau order actually simplifies the sli process. Why would more fences be needed if the usairways pilots are in nicolau seniority order? That makes no sense.
So, you're saying a fence wouldn't be needed to prevent a West F/O at the 40 percentile rank on the Nic list who should he end up technically senior to a senior legacy AA F/O on the pre-merger list to outbid him to a Group IV (777,787) F/O slot or Group II captains position on legacy AA equipment ?

What true expectations did that West F/O have of flying such equipment based on opportunities that for whatever reason (right or wrong) never materialized ?

Just as importantly (and this would apply to East pilots as well), since present and anticipated compensation at pre-merger is a quantifiable factor in considering the weight and value of pre-merger career expectations, how much was that West F/O making prior to the merge and what was his equipment and pay increase expectations relative to that same senior AA legacy F/O ?

Should an $85/hour (or whatever the senior West F/O pay was pre-merger) job in PHX equate or even outweigh a $130/hour job in MIA ?

To balance out the inequities that the Nic may give West pilots, especially in relation to AA pilots, serious fences would be needed to maintain career expectations. I'd be surprised if the arbitrators give the same weight to a 40% Nic pilot who was flying as a narrowbody F/O in PHX with that of a 40% AA pilot who might even be holding a $180/hour captains position, let alone that $130/hour AA F/O, but in order to place such pilot below AA F/O X above and eliminate a fence, he'd have to place all the East captains junior to him as well (to say nothing of all the East F/O's).

I suppose anything's possible, I just don't see that. I see a hybrid that bears little resemblance to the Nic.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:00 PM
  #352  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Well, ONE arbitrator thought that way and in the context of a pure U/AWA merge, it's debatable with some valid arguments from East pilots on its propriety. Since it was never implemented and as a result, the two pilot groups have remained separate and more importantly from a future arbitral consideration standpoint, would likely CONTINUE to remain separate for an extended period of time (perhaps even arguably in perpetuity) absent this merger, A MAJOR question for the final arbitration panel for THIS merge will be "does adoption of a pure Nic template for the US Airways pilot group as a whole simplify or complicate the concept of pre-merger career expectations as a litmus for this SLI with AA pilots ?".

Maintaining the pre-merger career expectations of all pilot groups will be a major argument in this SLI so as to prevent a windfall for any one group within the 3 presently defined lists. Regardless of whether the West gets their own reps and even if they then argue for the Nic, the arbitrators could discount that argument in that it would force undesirable complexities on a final ISL, including, but not limited to extensive and complicated fences. Personally, I don't see this final arbitration panel placing adoption of the unconsummated Nic as the first priority if it forces excessive complexities in the ISL or sacrifices the pre-merger career expectations of AA pilots.
Again, it's cocktail hour, so I reserve future analysis but I think that is a good post!

I can't see the tail wagging the dog on this one. Based on previous SLIs, I can't help but seeing AA pilots having the advantage here. Because of their higher % of widebodies(thus pay) more of them have the expectation of hitting that mark.

I like this whole civil thing! ;-)
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:07 PM
  #353  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

So, are arbitrators saying "Please God, no!" Or "let me at it!"
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:36 PM
  #354  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
So, you're saying a fence wouldn't be needed to prevent a West F/O at the 40 percentile rank on the Nic list who should he end up technically senior to a senior legacy AA F/O on the pre-merger list to outbid him to a Group IV (777,787) F/O slot or Group II captains position on legacy AA equipment ?

What true expectations did that West F/O have of flying such equipment based on opportunities that for whatever reason (right or wrong) never materialized ?

Just as importantly (and this would apply to East pilots as well), since present and anticipated compensation at pre-merger is a quantifiable factor in considering the weight and value of pre-merger career expectations, how much was that West F/O making prior to the merge and what was his equipment and pay increase expectations relative to that same senior AA legacy F/O ?

Should an $85/hour (or whatever the senior West F/O pay was pre-merger) job in PHX equate or even outweigh a $130/hour job in MIA ?

To balance out the inequities that the Nic may give West pilots, especially in relation to AA pilots, serious fences would be needed to maintain career expectations. I'd be surprised if the arbitrators give the same weight to a 40% Nic pilot who was flying as a narrowbody F/O in PHX with that of a 40% AA pilot who might even be holding a $180/hour captains position, let alone that $130/hour AA F/O, but in order to place such pilot below AA F/O X above and eliminate a fence, he'd have to place all the East captains junior to him as well (to say nothing of all the East F/O's).

I suppose anything's possible, I just don't see that. I see a hybrid that bears little resemblance to the Nic.
Apples and oranges, by your train of thought then the west pilots shpuld be senior to east pilots because they made more and had more vacation. 5200 usairways positions will be merged into 10000 american positions, doesn't matter what names are at each position. What does it matter if it's an east pilot or west pilot's name at a particular position? See you are running under the assumption that 3 distinct airlines are merging, that is not the case, there are 2 airlines here.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:38 PM
  #355  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Really? I will have to read it again as I have to admit that I'm well into cocktail hour, but I don't re member it favoring the west POV.
Really, the arbitrators "bought' that single management control is appropriate snapshot date, when did usairways/awa merge? Let be more clear, when were usairways/AWA run as one company?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:40 PM
  #356  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

BTW, and I will re-iterate this. Was usairways run as 2 separate companies over the lat 9 years or was it run as one entity?
cactiboss is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:45 PM
  #357  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 449
Default

It was ran as one entity with separate seniority lists, separate fleets, contracts, separate flight attendants. Maybe a few other things....
crzipilot is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:54 PM
  #358  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Apples and oranges, by your train of thought then the west pilots shpuld be senior to east pilots because they made more and had more vacation. 5200 usairways positions will be merged into 10000 american positions, doesn't matter what names are at each position. What does it matter if it's an east pilot or west pilot's name at a particular position? See you are running under the assumption that 3 distinct airlines are merging, that is not the case, there are 2 airlines here.
What age is attached to those US name placed ahead of AA guys? Would you rather have guys older or younger slotted ahead of you?
R57 relay is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:55 PM
  #359  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 449
Default

As has been said before, the requirements to use the NIC award was never finalized, Never saw the light of day. MOU stated all prior agreements were null. As eagle has stated Using the NIC Would require extensive fences to protect the AA guys. I can't see them willing to have an '07 hire mixed in their 87 hires. Not going to happen.

How ' bout the old solution that the NIC applies to the phx base, outside of that world whatever, apa/usapa/ or the arbitrators come up with.

I think the AA guys are starting to see what the NIC could mean to them.....
crzipilot is offline  
Old 09-15-2014, 03:00 PM
  #360  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
BTW, and I will re-iterate this. Was usairways run as 2 separate companies over the lat 9 years or was it run as one entity?
Pretty much as two separate companies. Notice the AWA flag on the nose doors ? Didn't you guys brag that your pay checks still said AWA until recently?
R57 relay is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TWA4ME
American
44
07-22-2014 06:37 PM
algflyr
American
108
06-25-2014 11:03 AM
Errbus
American
233
01-30-2014 10:44 AM
R57 relay
American
222
01-17-2014 02:17 PM
cactiboss
Major
447
01-09-2012 07:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices