Nic ...
#161
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 449
Bottom line, no JCBA. Process was never completed to activate and use the NIC. It's sitting in the corner, as an "ALPA" process, which never got completed. As soon as you vote ALPA back in maybe you can get that process completed, but unfortunately this MOU etc has made all prev agreements null.....
#162
You and cacti are so cute! Come on, fess up, you're twins right? Too bad the IQ got split with the egg.
See the questions I posed to cacti. You are free to answer.
Here's another one for you. Would you like the same standards Nic applied to us applied to you. I mean, you guys were in chp11. Most of the airline world said that your management team was doing a lousy job and that their plan was doomed to fail. This merger is magically producing great numbers right after the closing, just like US/AW. Dang, imagine that. Should LUS pilots get extra credit for that? Let me help you-NO.
See the questions I posed to cacti. You are free to answer.
Here's another one for you. Would you like the same standards Nic applied to us applied to you. I mean, you guys were in chp11. Most of the airline world said that your management team was doing a lousy job and that their plan was doomed to fail. This merger is magically producing great numbers right after the closing, just like US/AW. Dang, imagine that. Should LUS pilots get extra credit for that? Let me help you-NO.
For example:
"The APA Seniority Integration Committee made our proposal public for simple reasons. The proposal reflects every commitment we have made to USAPA with regard to the seniority integration process and contradicts false assertions being made by USAPA in an effort to delay a single-carrier finding by the NMB. It is time to agree to a protocol before this affects the ability of APA and USAPA to move forward in areas of mutual interest, such as the JCBA."
https://public.alliedpilots.org/apa/...The-Facts.aspx
That's what you get when you try to mislead and deceive the party sitting across the table.
Last edited by Frisco727; 09-12-2014 at 06:37 AM.
#164
Flies With The Hat On
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Yes, but at this point you may not be educating anyone as you've all been schooling each other for years!
I'm assuming you don't disagree that this will be resolved in short order, nor that our discussion outside of observing conflicting versions of history will effect the SLI arbitration.
You cannot compare AA's situation to US Airways in 2005. You lied about the US Airways financial condition and I caught you with the SEC filings. Now you want to suggest that American was doomed. If you are looking for sympathy on the Nic, you won't get it from me. Arbitration is a process that is not going to make everyone happy. The pattern I see is a blame game, whether it is ALPA, the arbitrator of the America West pilots. It is a relevant debate because it speaks volumes of the character flaw I see which was noted by the APA. It's called false assertions made by USAPA to the APA which were intended to mislead. The same thing you are doing here which speaks volumes of your character of lack thereof.
For example:
"The APA Seniority Integration Committee made our proposal public for simple reasons. The proposal reflects every commitment we have made to USAPA with regard to the seniority integration process and contradicts false assertions being made by USAPA in an effort to delay a single-carrier finding by the NMB. It is time to agree to a protocol before this affects the ability of APA and USAPA to move forward in areas of mutual interest, such as the JCBA."
https://public.alliedpilots.org/apa/...The-Facts.aspx
That's what you get when you try to mislead and deceive the party sitting across the table.
For example:
"The APA Seniority Integration Committee made our proposal public for simple reasons. The proposal reflects every commitment we have made to USAPA with regard to the seniority integration process and contradicts false assertions being made by USAPA in an effort to delay a single-carrier finding by the NMB. It is time to agree to a protocol before this affects the ability of APA and USAPA to move forward in areas of mutual interest, such as the JCBA."
https://public.alliedpilots.org/apa/...The-Facts.aspx
That's what you get when you try to mislead and deceive the party sitting across the table.
How exciting it is that JCBA and SLI are progressing so quickly!
I think we'll all be surprised to see how US Airways pilots will bring meaningful impact to APA.
I see many on this forum use the word "scab" loosely, but APA purportedly will not accept the application or dues from any US Airways pilot who ever crossed "the line." This is quite impressive.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#165
Yes, but at this point you may not be educating anyone as you've all been schooling each other for years!
I'm assuming you don't disagree that this will be resolved in short order, nor that our discussion outside of observing conflicting versions of history will effect the SLI arbitration.
USAPA and APA were aggressively sparing for competing interests, but we are beyond that now. A real spirit of cooperation has emerged. USAPA has even asked all of its pilots to immediately apply to APA for membership in anticipation of what could soon be a fast NMB determination!
How exciting it is that JCBA and SLI are progressing so quickly!
I think we'll all be surprised to see how US Airways pilots will bring meaningful impact to APA.
I see many on this forum use the word "scab" loosely, but APA purportedly will not accept the application or dues from any US Airways pilot who ever crossed "the line." This is quite impressive.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I'm assuming you don't disagree that this will be resolved in short order, nor that our discussion outside of observing conflicting versions of history will effect the SLI arbitration.
USAPA and APA were aggressively sparing for competing interests, but we are beyond that now. A real spirit of cooperation has emerged. USAPA has even asked all of its pilots to immediately apply to APA for membership in anticipation of what could soon be a fast NMB determination!
How exciting it is that JCBA and SLI are progressing so quickly!
I think we'll all be surprised to see how US Airways pilots will bring meaningful impact to APA.
I see many on this forum use the word "scab" loosely, but APA purportedly will not accept the application or dues from any US Airways pilot who ever crossed "the line." This is quite impressive.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#166
Flies With The Hat On
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
Nic ...
I agree that the s-word is not a word that should be treated lightly. We don't even need to use it, APA is going to apply the definition properly. You're either an APA member or a potential Sssssuspect.
People running low on thought or vocabulary may turn to emotional words too easily.
Notice I didn't ask who called which group a scab? Let's move forward!!!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#167
Agreed
#169
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
You cannot compare AA's situation to US Airways in 2005. You lied about the US Airways financial condition and I caught you with the SEC filings. Now you want to suggest that American was doomed/same situation as US Airways. If you are looking for sympathy on the Nic, you won't get it from me. Arbitration is a process that is not going to make everyone happy. The pattern I see is a blame game, whether it is ALPA, the arbitrator of the America West pilots. It is a relevant debate because it speaks volumes of the character flaw I see which was noted by the APA. It's called false assertions made by USAPA to the APA which were intended to mislead. The same thing you are doing here which speaks volumes of your character or lack thereof.
For example:
"The APA Seniority Integration Committee made our proposal public for simple reasons. The proposal reflects every commitment we have made to USAPA with regard to the seniority integration process and contradicts false assertions being made by USAPA in an effort to delay a single-carrier finding by the NMB. It is time to agree to a protocol before this affects the ability of APA and USAPA to move forward in areas of mutual interest, such as the JCBA."
https://public.alliedpilots.org/apa/...The-Facts.aspx
That's what you get when you try to mislead and deceive the party sitting across the table.
For example:
"The APA Seniority Integration Committee made our proposal public for simple reasons. The proposal reflects every commitment we have made to USAPA with regard to the seniority integration process and contradicts false assertions being made by USAPA in an effort to delay a single-carrier finding by the NMB. It is time to agree to a protocol before this affects the ability of APA and USAPA to move forward in areas of mutual interest, such as the JCBA."
https://public.alliedpilots.org/apa/...The-Facts.aspx
That's what you get when you try to mislead and deceive the party sitting across the table.
I figured that you would say that I was comparing AA and US's financial condition. I didn't. What I said is that your company too was in in Chp 11 at the time of the merger, and your managments plan was scoffed at. With that,WHAT IF an arbitrator used his crystal ball to say that your future wasn't as bright as our, so he gave us a windfall. How would you like that? Try reading and answering the question.
I never lied about anything. I've backed up what I had to say. You?
You made some predictions about how the APA was going to handle us. How has that worked out? Why didn't just wait until SCS and do what the want instead signing the PA?
You guys haven't been throught a SLI aritration before, have you? You may have some more surprises ahead.
#170
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post