Search

Notices

10 months to 190 Capt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2014, 03:33 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
With strict relative seniority, no one on either side will lose their relative place on the list. If you were a junior FO, you will remain a junior FO. If you were a senior CA, you will remain a senior CA. If you were smack dab in the middle of the list, you will remain in the middle of the list. That's really the only fair way to do it.


You have lots to learn about seniority integrations.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 03:36 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 223
Default

As a fellow "Third lister", I would like to voice that the ignorance and sense of entitlement that Canoe and Texaspilot display on this forum does NOT represent the majority of the group. I think they are the outliers that slipped through the cracks. Oh well.
CamYZ125 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 03:39 PM
  #83  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
With strict relative seniority, no one on either side will lose their relative place on the list. If you were a junior FO, you will remain a junior FO. If you were a senior CA, you will remain a senior CA. If you were smack dab in the middle of the list, you will remain in the middle of the list. That's really the only fair way to do it.
I think that's too simplistic, but it's what you believe and you are certainly entitled to your beliefs. Look at the last 3 merger SLI's. DL/NW - UA/CO - SW/AT ALL had unique issues and differences in their SLI's. Expect a similar situation here with our unique issues.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 03:49 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by CamYZ125
As a fellow "Third lister", I would like to voice that the ignorance and sense of entitlement that Canoe and Texaspilot display on this forum does NOT represent the majority of the group. I think they are the outliers that slipped through the cracks. Oh well.
OK, I guess I feel entitled because I don't want to lose my relative position on the list. I apologize. I'll just smile and bend over and be a team player while I get screwed.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 04:17 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
OK, I guess I feel entitled because I don't want to lose my relative position on the list. I apologize. I'll just smile and bend over and be a team player while I get screwed.
But weren't you advocating pilots of more senior relative position on the AA list go BEHIND you (back to the bottom) because they were furloughed and exercised their contractual ability to defer recall ?

I guess it's all about you.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 04:32 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
But weren't you advocating pilots of more senior relative position on the AA list go BEHIND you (back to the bottom) because they were furloughed and exercised their contractual ability to defer recall ?

I guess it's all about you.
Furloughs are not active pilots, therefore not part of the seniority integration.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 04:40 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Furloughs are not active pilots, therefore not part of the seniority integration.
Yes they are. They have a seniority number even on furlough. Now you can argue they don't have longevity but that's a whole different matter. Curious, were you a PSA flowthrough?
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 04:48 PM
  #88  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Furloughs are not active pilots, therefore not part of the seniority integration.
According to who ?

Where is it written that only "active" pilots will be considered part of any given seniority integration. Has your litmus been applied to every SLI in the past ?

Man, you been spending too much time on planet USAPA.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 04:59 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,527
Default

Since US rode to AA's rescue could you post AA's BK pay rates vs. US' pay rates outside of BK? Not the MOU pay rates but the pay rates without the merger.

And if relative seniority is the fair way why didn't that happen in the UA/CO merger?

You can't separate US east and west w/b percentages(15% and 0%) and count them seperately. It was a combined operation. Roughly 8% vs. 20%.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:00 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Drizzle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 596
Default

The best we third listers can hope for is a longevity adjustment, which I think would be fair. We are getting to the point where there are many third list pilot could have more longevity than some AA furloughs. I think an adjustment for that should be made a la UAL/CAL.
The Drizzle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RonWeasley
Hangar Talk
24
11-07-2011 08:39 AM
DLax85
Cargo
35
04-23-2008 10:26 AM
left seat
Flight Schools and Training
5
04-15-2008 08:46 PM
RockBottom
Major
19
10-09-2005 08:08 AM
CRJammin
Cargo
4
09-16-2005 07:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices