Search

Notices

10 months to 190 Capt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2014, 01:06 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
The irony is rich here. Same could be said for AWA guys back in 2005, with their quick movement and upgrades versus US Airway's junior late '80s DOH Captains. Nicolau slotted them accordingly. How'd that work out? Nic slotted some year 2000+ DOH AWA guys with US guys hired in the early 90s. US East screamed bloody murder and rejected the Nic, threw out ALPA, and voted in USAPA to keep Nic off property. Now you want a favorable slotting against AA? How is this not the same situation as with AWA-US? It's the same thing and now you want the cake and eat it too.

Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
No change of tune here. I never said I didn't support Nic. I think the Nic was fair. Straight relative seniority.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 01:19 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

Thanks for clarifying. My experience with binding arbitration was that the arbitrator heavily favored the airline that brought in the bigger airplane. The bigger plane, the greater the pay, and hence the greater the career expectation. As such the award favored the airline that brought those airplanes more so than it did mine.

Similarly, you see that US Airways has only a handful of widebodies. I don't recall the exact amount but somewhere along the lines of 10 767s and 22 A330s so maybe 30-40 widebodies total. AA on the other hand has tons of 767s and 777s around 120-130 total. The top of any combined list has not only the senior side but the international widebody side which is most coveted in terms of seniority and pay. In the Delta/NWA case, the arbitrator protected the 777s which were only at Delta and the 747s which were only at Northwest. US doesn't have any 777s and a handful of 767s. Realistically speaking, you will not see a straight-up-relative integration simply because it would introduce many US pilots who had no career expectation beyond the 30-40 widebodies today, into a widebody fleet of 120-130 that AA has today. Would you think that is fair? By straight relative only, it would introduce many US domestic narrowbody pilots into a the widebody fleet at AA which was not a realistic expectation because US only had 30-40 widebodies to begin with.


Historically speaking, the major airline brining in the bigger widebody fleet will tend to do better than the one that is not. Because the 777 does not exist at US, most likely you will find the top of the list will be heavily all AA. The widebody fleet of the 767 can good a good category ratio mix because it exists at both airlines. The majority of US guys category falls in the domestic narrowbody arena. Recent arbitrators have all used category/class methods and not just straight up relative.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 01:27 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Do like Nicolau did. Ratio the widebody flying based on each sides fleet, then relative for everyone else, with furloughs on bottom.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 01:29 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jetdriver7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: 320 FO
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
Eagle guys correct me.. I believe most AA numbered Eagle guys/gals are already at AA. The 824 do not have #'s. Legacy AA is hiring. Think those guys/gals are slotted in seniority with the 824 flows as the flows come to class.
Correct. Anyone in the 824 do not have numbers. Seniority wise they are treated like a new hire. Have to set foot on property. No worries about them. We are above all of them.
Jetdriver7 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 02:15 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
I just hope that if and when the seniority integration goes to the arbitrator, he will take into consideration our career expectation at US Airways of quick movementcompared to AA and slot us accordingly.
You've got to be kidding me. I'm not sure who you are or what gear your pulling, but that was why the Arbitrator came up with the NIC like he did. USAIR was dead....days from DEAD. NO CAREER EXPECTATIONS. SCUMBAGS. Yet all those east that were furloughed eventually got to come back while the "west stagnated and actually furloughed west pilots. So I hope to god your not a 3rd lister....

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
All furloughs need to be placed behind all active pilots. If your laid off, then you're not an employee. And all these Eagle flows need to come in as new hires.
So which is it..............do you want to take into account "career expectations" or do you want to put the furloughed guys at the back. I'm only guessing, but you sound like a USAIRWAYS 3rd lister. After so much stagnation and seperate ops your starting to think your actually entitled to something more then what a "west" guy has. Please tell me I'm wrong.
morecowbell is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 02:21 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by morecowbell
You've got to be kidding me. I'm not sure who you are or what gear your pulling, but that was why the Arbitrator came up with the NIC like he did. USAIR was dead....days from DEAD. NO CAREER EXPECTATIONS. SCUMBAGS. Yet all those east that were furloughed eventually got to come back while the "west stagnated and actually furloughed west pilots. So I hope to god your not a 3rd lister....



So which is it..............do you want to take into account "career expectations" or do you want to put the furloughed guys at the back. I'm only guessing, but you sound like a USAIRWAYS 3rd lister. After so much stagnation and seperate ops your starting to think your actually entitled to something more then what a "west" guy has. Please tell me I'm wrong.
I have no beef with East or West pilots. I feel the US legal list is the Nic with 3rd listers below. That list needs to be taken to the table with AA and form one combined list based on relative seniority of all active pilots. This would affect AA furloughs only, US has no furloughs. And, like I said before, those AA furloughs had a chance to come back but didn't. Thats their choice, but there are consequences to that decision.

And for career expectation, US pilots were moving up quickly and the company was making record profits. AA was bankrupt and taking concessions. We helped save the future of AA. Now we can all enjoy Delta type pay.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 02:25 PM
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Jetdriver7
Correct. Anyone in the 824 do not have numbers. Seniority wise they are treated like a new hire. Have to set foot on property. No worries about them. We are above all of them.
Yes, no "worries" about them. The question is, who are you worried about then and who is "we" ?
eaglefly is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 02:27 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ForeverFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 737
Default

We helped save the future of AA.
Oh please... we could have exited bankruptcy with ease without the merger taking place. However, I continue to believe the merger is a good thing, despite the bickering.
ForeverFO is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 02:31 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Drizzle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 596
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76

And for career expectation, US pilots were moving up quickly and the company was making record profits. AA was bankrupt and taking concessions. We helped save the future of AA. Now we can all enjoy Delta type pay.
Dude, that dog ain't gonna hunt.
The Drizzle is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 02:31 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by ForeverFO
Oh please... we could have exited bankruptcy with ease without the merger taking place. However, I continue to believe the merger is a good thing, despite the bickering.
I agree. I think we are all excited. I'm just worried about our pilots who are holding blocks and close to an upgrade getting stagnated for years with an unfair seniority integration.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RonWeasley
Hangar Talk
24
11-07-2011 08:39 AM
DLax85
Cargo
35
04-23-2008 10:26 AM
left seat
Flight Schools and Training
5
04-15-2008 08:46 PM
RockBottom
Major
19
10-09-2005 08:08 AM
CRJammin
Cargo
4
09-16-2005 07:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices