Search

Notices

10 months to 190 Capt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2014, 12:25 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TQ Nola's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Serious as a heart attack.

You think that a pilot that is laid off from a carrier who is bankrupt has a good career expectation? Yet, a pilot who works for a carrier that is making record profits and is moving rapidly up the seniority list has a poor career expectation?

So, based on your assumption, the furloughed pilot from the bankrupt carrier should jump the list ahead of the pilots at the stable carrier and unseat them, and go from being out of a job to holding a block, and send the other pilot back to the bottom of the list on reserve. That's ridiculous. All of you cannot possibly believe that would be fair.
Not only do I think it's fair; every judge in the history of aviation (AFAIK, albeit given zero research or desire to research) also thinks it's fair.

There are guys senior to me who are still exercising their contractual right to defer, and I've been here (AA) 14 years. Do I think they should flow to the bottom? No.

Be as serious as you like; there's not even a ghost of a chance your particular sense of fairness will be used. Bookmark this post for reference.
TQ Nola is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 12:49 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Serious as a heart attack.

You think that a pilot that is laid off from a carrier who is bankrupt has a good career expectation? Yet, a pilot who works for a carrier that is making record profits and is moving rapidly up the seniority list has a poor career expectation?
You should ask USAPA that question. Funny how this argument is being used now that it's AA and US. Back when the same thing in reverse was true for US Airways (carrier with pilot layoffs and carrier bankrupt twice) versus working for a carrier making a little money and moving up the seniority list (AWA).... well the Nic was "unfair"
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 12:51 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,527
Default

Freeflyfreak - you're correct. Forgot about the Dec. class with the first 824 er's.
Sliceback is online now  
Old 01-21-2014, 12:52 PM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 89
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76

You think that a pilot that is laid off from a carrier who is bankrupt has a good career expectation? Yet, a pilot who works for a carrier that is making record profits and is moving rapidly up the seniority list has a poor career expectation?

So, based on your assumption, the furloughed pilot from the bankrupt carrier should jump the list ahead of the pilots at the stable carrier and unseat them, and go from being out of a job to holding a block, and send the other pilot back to the bottom of the list on reserve. That's ridiculous. All of you cannot possibly believe that would be fair.
I don't think that today's circumstances should be held as a constant truth for ones 30 year career. I absolutely believe what you wrote above to be fair- they'll retire before you, and you will eventually get your block back. The term "career expectation" is a con in order to better one's own position to the detriment of another. The industry picture changes far too rapidly to have any expectation.......well, maybe there are a few things you should expect, or at least plan on. At least if you are wise, and then you should expect this:

1. ) You will take a paycut in your career.
2. ) You will be displaced.

Those that plan on this never exceed their means. They are also the ones that didn't hang themselves in the early 2000's and won't be manning the door at Wal-Mart post 65.

Also, before flinging poo in my direction in regard to what I have written above, please note that I am, indeed, a "Third List" pilot myself.
JumpersAway79 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 12:54 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by TQ Nola
Not only do I think it's fair; every judge in the history of aviation (AFAIK, albeit given zero research or desire to research) also thinks it's fair.
Actually...there was an arbitrator that agrees with Texaspilot. I think his name was spelled N-i-c-o-l-a-u.
kingairip is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 12:55 PM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 89
Default

Originally Posted by TQ Nola
Not only do I think it's fair; every judge in the history of aviation (AFAIK, albeit given zero research or desire to research) also thinks it's fair.

There are guys senior to me who are still exercising their contractual right to defer, and I've been here (AA) 14 years. Do I think they should flow to the bottom? No.

Be as serious as you like; there's not even a ghost of a chance your particular sense of fairness will be used. Bookmark this post for reference.
Where's the "Like" button???? You Sir, get it!
JumpersAway79 is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 12:56 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
I just hope that if and when the seniority integration goes to the arbitrator, he will take into consideration our career expectation at US Airways of quick movement compared to AA and slot us accordingly.
The irony is rich here. Same could be said for AWA guys back in 2005, with their quick movement and upgrades versus US Airway's junior late '80s DOH Captains. Nicolau slotted them accordingly. How'd that work out? Nic slotted some year 2000+ DOH AWA guys with US guys hired in the early 90s. US East screamed bloody murder and rejected the Nic, threw out ALPA, and voted in USAPA to keep Nic off property. Now you want a favorable slotting against AA? How is this not the same situation as with AWA-US? It's the same thing and now you want the cake and eat it too.

Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 01:01 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Drizzle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 596
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
The irony is rich here. Same could be said for AWA guys back in 2005, with their quick movement and upgrades versus US Airway's junior late '80s DOH Captains. Nicolau slotted them accordingly. How'd that work out? Nic slotted some year 2000+ DOH AWA guys with US guys hired in the early 90s. US East screamed bloody murder and rejected the Nic, threw out ALPA, and voted in USAPA to keep Nic off property. Now you want a favorable slotting against AA? How is this not the same situation as with AWA-US? It's the same thing and now you want the cake and eat it too.

Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
I don't see the irony or change in tune. Third listers aren't remotely the same as east pilots in terms of our merger thoughts.
The Drizzle is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 01:05 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

Originally Posted by The Drizzle
I don't see the irony or change in tune. Third listers aren't remotely the same as east pilots in terms of our merger thoughts.
Good point. I should have figured those extreme views had to be a 3rd lister. Makes more sense now. Regardless, best of luck. I've been through binding arbitration SLI and wouldn't wish it upon anyone but this is what happens when pilots cannot agree on seniority. And when it comes to seniority all gloves come off. Everyone wants the highest position and/or the highest number compared to the other group guys.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-21-2014, 01:05 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
The irony is rich here. Same could be said for AWA guys back in 2005, with their quick movement and upgrades versus US Airway's junior late '80s DOH Captains. Nicolau slotted them accordingly. How'd that work out? Nic slotted some 2000+ DOH AWA guys with US guys hired in the early 90s. US East screamed bloody murder and rejected the Nic, threw out ALPA, and voted in USAPA to keep Nic off property. Now you want a favorable slotting against AA?

Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
A little clarification here. Texaspilot (as am I) is a "third lister". IOW, he was hired after the merger. His thoughts and opinions had nothing to do with the great SLI food fight. So, there is no "table" being "turned" on Texaspilot.

But, there is some irony here...some guys here obviously think Texaspilot's assertion that furloughs should be stapled to the bottom of the list is preposterous. (I agree with them.) These same people, however, think it's horrible, HORRIBLE, that the "East" didn't embrace the Nic. THAT is rich.
kingairip is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RonWeasley
Hangar Talk
24
11-07-2011 08:39 AM
DLax85
Cargo
35
04-23-2008 10:26 AM
left seat
Flight Schools and Training
5
04-15-2008 08:46 PM
RockBottom
Major
19
10-09-2005 08:08 AM
CRJammin
Cargo
4
09-16-2005 07:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices