10 months to 190 Capt
#51
Serious as a heart attack.
You think that a pilot that is laid off from a carrier who is bankrupt has a good career expectation? Yet, a pilot who works for a carrier that is making record profits and is moving rapidly up the seniority list has a poor career expectation?
So, based on your assumption, the furloughed pilot from the bankrupt carrier should jump the list ahead of the pilots at the stable carrier and unseat them, and go from being out of a job to holding a block, and send the other pilot back to the bottom of the list on reserve. That's ridiculous. All of you cannot possibly believe that would be fair.
You think that a pilot that is laid off from a carrier who is bankrupt has a good career expectation? Yet, a pilot who works for a carrier that is making record profits and is moving rapidly up the seniority list has a poor career expectation?
So, based on your assumption, the furloughed pilot from the bankrupt carrier should jump the list ahead of the pilots at the stable carrier and unseat them, and go from being out of a job to holding a block, and send the other pilot back to the bottom of the list on reserve. That's ridiculous. All of you cannot possibly believe that would be fair.
There are guys senior to me who are still exercising their contractual right to defer, and I've been here (AA) 14 years. Do I think they should flow to the bottom? No.
Be as serious as you like; there's not even a ghost of a chance your particular sense of fairness will be used. Bookmark this post for reference.
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Serious as a heart attack.
You think that a pilot that is laid off from a carrier who is bankrupt has a good career expectation? Yet, a pilot who works for a carrier that is making record profits and is moving rapidly up the seniority list has a poor career expectation?
You think that a pilot that is laid off from a carrier who is bankrupt has a good career expectation? Yet, a pilot who works for a carrier that is making record profits and is moving rapidly up the seniority list has a poor career expectation?
#54
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 89
You think that a pilot that is laid off from a carrier who is bankrupt has a good career expectation? Yet, a pilot who works for a carrier that is making record profits and is moving rapidly up the seniority list has a poor career expectation?
So, based on your assumption, the furloughed pilot from the bankrupt carrier should jump the list ahead of the pilots at the stable carrier and unseat them, and go from being out of a job to holding a block, and send the other pilot back to the bottom of the list on reserve. That's ridiculous. All of you cannot possibly believe that would be fair.
1. ) You will take a paycut in your career.
2. ) You will be displaced.
Those that plan on this never exceed their means. They are also the ones that didn't hang themselves in the early 2000's and won't be manning the door at Wal-Mart post 65.
Also, before flinging poo in my direction in regard to what I have written above, please note that I am, indeed, a "Third List" pilot myself.
#55
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
#56
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 89
Not only do I think it's fair; every judge in the history of aviation (AFAIK, albeit given zero research or desire to research) also thinks it's fair.
There are guys senior to me who are still exercising their contractual right to defer, and I've been here (AA) 14 years. Do I think they should flow to the bottom? No.
Be as serious as you like; there's not even a ghost of a chance your particular sense of fairness will be used. Bookmark this post for reference.
There are guys senior to me who are still exercising their contractual right to defer, and I've been here (AA) 14 years. Do I think they should flow to the bottom? No.
Be as serious as you like; there's not even a ghost of a chance your particular sense of fairness will be used. Bookmark this post for reference.
#57
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
#58
The irony is rich here. Same could be said for AWA guys back in 2005, with their quick movement and upgrades versus US Airway's junior late '80s DOH Captains. Nicolau slotted them accordingly. How'd that work out? Nic slotted some year 2000+ DOH AWA guys with US guys hired in the early 90s. US East screamed bloody murder and rejected the Nic, threw out ALPA, and voted in USAPA to keep Nic off property. Now you want a favorable slotting against AA? How is this not the same situation as with AWA-US? It's the same thing and now you want the cake and eat it too.
Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
#59
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Good point. I should have figured those extreme views had to be a 3rd lister. Makes more sense now. Regardless, best of luck. I've been through binding arbitration SLI and wouldn't wish it upon anyone but this is what happens when pilots cannot agree on seniority. And when it comes to seniority all gloves come off. Everyone wants the highest position and/or the highest number compared to the other group guys.
#60
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
The irony is rich here. Same could be said for AWA guys back in 2005, with their quick movement and upgrades versus US Airway's junior late '80s DOH Captains. Nicolau slotted them accordingly. How'd that work out? Nic slotted some 2000+ DOH AWA guys with US guys hired in the early 90s. US East screamed bloody murder and rejected the Nic, threw out ALPA, and voted in USAPA to keep Nic off property. Now you want a favorable slotting against AA?
Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
Now that the table is turned, it's ironic to hear the change in tune that was the basis for establishing USAPA and kicking out the Nic award. Before the arbitrator looks at that he's going to be scratching his head when you present a East list and a West list. Career expectation cuts both ways. One could argue LOA93 would have continued until enough East retired to bring the numbers of AWA+US-newhires to outnumber original East. Maybe then they could have voted out USAPA.
But, there is some irony here...some guys here obviously think Texaspilot's assertion that furloughs should be stapled to the bottom of the list is preposterous. (I agree with them.) These same people, however, think it's horrible, HORRIBLE, that the "East" didn't embrace the Nic. THAT is rich.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
left seat
Flight Schools and Training
5
04-15-2008 08:46 PM