10 months to 190 Capt
#151
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
I love it when someone makes my point!! You should have stopped at "I certainly don't know" because you have shown from your posts that you don't. In spades. Yet, you go on to make definitive statements that are WRONG. You really, really, should not listen to cacti and WD. Your posts make me concerned about your judgement.
Since I definitively don't know, I'm concerned that you're concerned about ME or my judgement. Since I don't know, wouldn't disregard be a better reaction then concern ?
It is at least here on planet Earth.
#152
My gut still says that if we go to arbitration, it will end up being the Nic or a very similar list. One could assume that arbitrators will either honor their esteemed collegue's previous ruling. Or will follow the same ratios/logic used at constructing the new (over-all) list to merge the East/West lists -- if they determine that USAPA's argument is correct and the AW-US transition Agreement was never completed, thus no list currently exists. Either way, it is based on a relative position list, not a simple DoH. Call it Nic Light or Nic Jr (because the bottom will be a little different than the original Nic list, but the top remains generally the same).
Again, I was much more certain of where it would go a month ago. I've been wrong in the past, and am certain I will also be wrong in the future. So, who knows....
#153
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
So you're saying USAPA DIDN'T demand DOH, WAS willing to negotiate with the West, DIDN'T accept binding arbitration, DIDN'T disregard the arbitration award and DIDN'T use the East majority to elect a new union to minimize the ability of the minority to force the majority to live up to what they agreed to ?
I'm sorry, I guess I'm confused and don't know what I'm talking about. Silly me.
I've repeatedly said I don't care whether they use the Nic or not. I HAVE stated that I still stand behind that even though I know I'd probably do better in the SLI without it. As for some West pilots desire to get the best for them at my expense, I have no illusions about that either. I'm sure there are plenty in that department. That's because they are airline pilots and Airlinii Pilotus is a very predictable and cannibalistic creature. So are their unions.
I can assure you my eyes are wide open, my friend.
I'm sorry, I guess I'm confused and don't know what I'm talking about. Silly me.
I've repeatedly said I don't care whether they use the Nic or not. I HAVE stated that I still stand behind that even though I know I'd probably do better in the SLI without it. As for some West pilots desire to get the best for them at my expense, I have no illusions about that either. I'm sure there are plenty in that department. That's because they are airline pilots and Airlinii Pilotus is a very predictable and cannibalistic creature. So are their unions.
I can assure you my eyes are wide open, my friend.
The plan Lee Seham came up with was that a new bargaining agent had the right to NEGOTIATE all sections of the contract. Their proposal for section 22 was just that, a proposal. They no more demanded that, or had any right to demand that, than they could demand a million bucks an hour. And IMHO, they had about as much chance of getting it as a million bucks an hour. There was never one day spent negotiating that section with US Airways.
Yes, USAPA tried to use it's majority status to change the Nic. Thing was, under that TA ALPA had the same right. A series of events came together that allowed that.
You intermingle the actions of USAPA, ALPA and east pilots. Often it was different groups of people doing certain things.
The big question is, why do you bother? If the Eagle FT is no concern of US pilots, why is the Nic any concern of yours? If you are not going to learn the facts, you would be better served staying out of it.
#154
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
I have no doubt a Usapian believes I "don't know". That's because apparently unless one IS a Usapian, one doesn't know. ONLY Usapians know and those who aren't don't. Heck, now it is the APA that "doesn't know". I get that. I think A LOT of us get that now. It's about the ONLY thing I understand about your planet, so you didn't need to highlight that again. Cacti and WD don't do my thinking, but perhaps that's a Usapian thing too.
Since I definitively don't know, I'm concerned that you're concerned about ME or my judgement. Since I don't know, wouldn't disregard be a better reaction then concern ?
It is at least here on planet Earth.
Since I definitively don't know, I'm concerned that you're concerned about ME or my judgement. Since I don't know, wouldn't disregard be a better reaction then concern ?
It is at least here on planet Earth.
I've heard the term AAholian. You seem to be one.
#155
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Ignorance ? But.........
......you begin your timeline AFTER the agreement of binding arbitration and your rejection of the results. It would seem you're selectively glossing over my ignorance to quietly sweep certain facts under the Usapian rug and........
.....basically admit this aspect of my ignorance. I guess if you're not selectively sweeping things under the rug, you're admitting what you can't sweep and then.....
....muddy up what I was saying elsewhere. It was essentially the same group of people just changing their nametags from ALPA to USAPA.
The Eagle FT IS a concern with some East pilots - 3rd listers. They've piped up repeatedly about what they believe should occur with these AA pilots. I'm certainly not going to learn the facts from you, that's for sure. I consider you one of the most biased sources on this subject here on the forum. Perhaps that's why I've never asked you for your "facts" ?
The plan Lee Seham came up with was that a new bargaining agent had the right to NEGOTIATE all sections of the contract. Their proposal for section 22 was just that, a proposal. They no more demanded that, or had any right to demand that, than they could demand a million bucks an hour. And IMHO, they had about as much chance of getting it as a million bucks an hour. There was never one day spent negotiating that section with US Airways.
The Eagle FT IS a concern with some East pilots - 3rd listers. They've piped up repeatedly about what they believe should occur with these AA pilots. I'm certainly not going to learn the facts from you, that's for sure. I consider you one of the most biased sources on this subject here on the forum. Perhaps that's why I've never asked you for your "facts" ?
#156
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
AAholian ?
Hmmm.......never heard that one, but...............I LIKE IT !
It's got some panache.
#157
Ignorance ? But.........
......you begin your timeline AFTER the agreement of binding arbitration and your rejection of the results. It would seem you're selectively glossing over my ignorance to quietly sweep certain facts under the Usapian rug and........
.....basically admit this aspect of my ignorance. I guess if you're not selectively sweeping things under the rug, you're admitting what you can't sweep and then.....
....muddy up what I was saying elsewhere. It was essentially the same group of people just changing their nametags from ALPA to USAPA.
The Eagle FT IS a concern with some East pilots - 3rd listers. They've piped up repeatedly about what they believe should occur with these AA pilots. I'm certainly not going to learn the facts from you, that's for sure. I consider you one of the most biased sources on this subject here on the forum. Perhaps that's why I've never asked you for your "facts" ?
......you begin your timeline AFTER the agreement of binding arbitration and your rejection of the results. It would seem you're selectively glossing over my ignorance to quietly sweep certain facts under the Usapian rug and........
.....basically admit this aspect of my ignorance. I guess if you're not selectively sweeping things under the rug, you're admitting what you can't sweep and then.....
....muddy up what I was saying elsewhere. It was essentially the same group of people just changing their nametags from ALPA to USAPA.
The Eagle FT IS a concern with some East pilots - 3rd listers. They've piped up repeatedly about what they believe should occur with these AA pilots. I'm certainly not going to learn the facts from you, that's for sure. I consider you one of the most biased sources on this subject here on the forum. Perhaps that's why I've never asked you for your "facts" ?
#158
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 130
You get a pro west guy, have him promise to defend the third listers, and the east will be in trouble.
#159
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
I think it's a Usapian thing.
#160
Flies With The Hat On
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Right of the Left Seat
Posts: 1,339
eaglefly,
No one's expressed opinion on this board matters—it affects no meaningful change.
Some may characterize you as being out of place for talking down to so many pilots. You're absolutely entitled to your opinions, but why do you go out of your way to muddy the waters between our groups?
It is understandable if you are insecure about your outcome in this merger, but stop inciting negative discussions.
Infighting with the people you need to have a successful career is not beneficial.
No one's expressed opinion on this board matters—it affects no meaningful change.
Some may characterize you as being out of place for talking down to so many pilots. You're absolutely entitled to your opinions, but why do you go out of your way to muddy the waters between our groups?
It is understandable if you are insecure about your outcome in this merger, but stop inciting negative discussions.
Infighting with the people you need to have a successful career is not beneficial.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
left seat
Flight Schools and Training
5
04-15-2008 08:46 PM