Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Two US Airways Unions Hold Back >

Two US Airways Unions Hold Back

Search

Notices

Two US Airways Unions Hold Back

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2013, 10:57 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Anybody that has been around the east group for very long knows how cheaply we could have been bought!

I think a decent contract, not even industry average, and a 5 year fence before USAPA got in would have done it.
That should have been the east's move then. They sat down and demanded DOH with no other alternative plays. Its the same as sitting at the poker table and going all in on a pair of two's then get beat and demand you pay them or else. Like I said Relay it sends the wrong message.

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 10:57 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
No I didnt leave it out. There are many who would rather take the 190 upgrade for the sake of upgrading. We have pilots here with several years on the 3rd list captains.

No one is winning and that much is for sure but considering the alternative its much better that we see it all the way thru now. It will end that much is a certainty and much sooner than later. See its no longer financially beneficial for LCC and they need it over with merger or not.

Now I don't know but guessing here that you didn't compromise with your children when they made poor decisions. I am betting you and your spouse explained that when you make bad decisions you must live with the consequences of that decision as it teaches being responsible for your actions.

Usapa expects or rather demands to be rewarded for their poor decision and we just will not do that. It send the wrong message.

WD at AWA
I sent you a PM to answer this as to not pollute this thread with the same old BS.

I hope you are right that this is about over no matter the outcome with AA, but I doubt it considering the grievance backlog we have. Parker doesn't care about anything but the bottom line and status quo helps his.

I'd like to know the logic in the company and AA not supporting USAPA's friend of court filing.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 10:58 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
What does that mean? Have you followed those grievances?

The snapback was a loser, not intended. But the company used the language that was later grieved to get that win. I know you hate USAPA, but can't you admit that the RLA grievance policy is flawed?
Did usapa agree to go to "final and binding arbitration" to settle the grievance? Did usapa just hire a law firm to attempt and get out of "final and binding"? As to my question of "what it means" I think it is very clear. The east pilots cannot be trusted to live up to any agreements EVER. The notion the west give up "SOMETHING" is ridiculous on it's face since the east cannot and will not live up to any agreements, it's in the DNA of the east pilots.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 11:01 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
The notion the west give up "SOMETHING" is ridiculous on it's face since the east cannot and will not live up to any agreements, it's in the DNA of the east pilots.
Yeah, it's in our DNA. Piedmont, Empire, PSA, Allegheny, US Air, US Airways, Trump, Eastern-they all managed to pick only the pilots with that DNA. Do you actually believe your own BS?
R57 relay is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 11:08 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Drizzle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 596
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Yeah, it's in our DNA. Piedmont, Empire, PSA, Allegheny, US Air, US Airways, Trump, Eastern-they all managed to pick only the pilots with that DNA. Do you actually believe your own BS?
They don't believe they were born with it, but from those I fly with it seems their DNA was mutated by abuses, real or perceived.
The Drizzle is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 11:18 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
That should have been the east's move then. They sat down and demanded DOH with no other alternative plays. Its the same as sitting at the poker table and going all in on a pair of two's then get beat and demand you pay them or else. Like I said Relay it sends the wrong message.

WD at AWA
Surely you jest! Parker would not have sat down with the Queen of England represented by Jesus Christ if it meant getting out of LOA 93. And the RLA made his strategy work indefinitely.
justjack is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 11:31 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by The Drizzle
They don't believe they were born with it, but from those I fly with it seems their DNA was mutated by abuses, real or perceived.

I've seen your posts and it's obvious that you think you are victim too. How's that job hunt coming today? Pulling for ya!
R57 relay is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 11:46 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by The Drizzle
They don't believe they were born with it, but from those I fly with it seems their DNA was mutated by abuses, real or perceived.
Although you might mean this as sarcasm there is some truth to this. I started at Piedmont on the "B" scale- deregulation started while I was still in the military. Piedmont merged with USAir and the pilots with Piedmont lost seniority, no relative seniority- but we moved on. In bankruptcy the RETIREMENT Systems of Alabama put my retirement into the PBGC. This was followed by two concessionary bankruptcy contracts. Lest we forget, the government conditions on the loan that they made to USAirways after 9/11 involved terms and conditions that drove many of the pilot concessions. I have flown with some ex-Eastern pilots, so I know it could be worse. Still, after all of this, the Nic was so egregious and we lost the very seniority that we had been protecting. All the while, I have been on the wrong side of ALPA's seniority policy du jour and on the wrong side of government regulation- deregulation du-jour. Real or perceived.
justjack is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 11:50 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Wiskey Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Default

Originally Posted by justjack
Surely you jest! Parker would not have sat down with the Queen of England represented by Jesus Christ if it meant getting out of LOA 93. And the RLA made his strategy work indefinitely.
Keep in mind that we also had a JNC working at the very same time the merger committees were working. The company came out with what has been coined the kirby proposal which was geared toward the east and had nothing for us out west. We were ready to counter when the award was issued then the east mec packed up all their marbles and refused to play anymore.

This tactic of theirs of going all in then demanding more when they lose is beyond belief. We can not and will not compromise after the fact my friend and willing to take it all the way to the ends of the earth on principle.

WD at AWA
Wiskey Driver is offline  
Old 11-02-2013, 11:50 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,299
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
Did usapa agree to go to "final and binding arbitration" to settle the grievance?

Under the RLA you have no choice, just like we had no choice under ALPA merger policy.

Do you have an idea how many grievances we had before the merger and how many have added up since? I know you hate USAPA and anything east, but don't you think the system is broken?
R57 relay is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
cactiboss
Major
64
05-01-2009 08:42 PM
ERJ135
Major
114
04-02-2008 06:48 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices