American interviews and class dates
#4301
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,482
Apply to everyone, even your 8th choice. You don't pick them, they pick you. #1-7 might not like you so 'love the one you're with.'
#4303
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,482
But his DOH has NOTHING to do with his SLI place. Nada. Zip. He's number X and the arbitrators will evaluate everyone and X might do better, or worse, with the arbs trying to balance the significant variables that affect 13,000 pilots.
#4304
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
It's a forum and who can say what's true and not from any of our claims here ?
I was discussing things that had little or nothing to do with my specifics, yet I'm vilified and attacked for it and you wonder why I don't cry uncle to cyberthuggery or cooperate with those who embrace it ?
I have no problem being a "chicken sh*t" in your eyes Slice as that's not any new revelation to me. You've made that clear in other terms before, so what else is new ? I can live with that.
#4305
When I read through the current LAA seniority list, this seems to be the case and reading the proposed LAA ISL also backs this up. So yes F/T's that flowed prior to the merger have their spot on the LAA list, but flow's since Dec 2013 mix in with new hires.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
#4306
I think it's chicken sh*t that he won't mention his AE/AA hire into. It would help put his pontificating in perspective or the trash bin.
But his DOH has NOTHING to do with his SLI place. Nada. Zip. He's number X and the arbitrators will evaluate everyone and X might do better, or worse, with the arbs trying to balance the significant variables that affect 13,000 pilots.
But his DOH has NOTHING to do with his SLI place. Nada. Zip. He's number X and the arbitrators will evaluate everyone and X might do better, or worse, with the arbs trying to balance the significant variables that affect 13,000 pilots.
#4308
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
The problem is, there is a lot of confusion and rumors on the LUS side about flows. I've flown with numerous guys that think that flows not even on property yet (still at Envoy) are going to be put ahead of guys hired in 99 at LUS. As far as I can tell, that's not true at all. In fact, my understanding is guys who flowed after 9 Dec 2013 are flowing into seniority with the class they are in, and hence will be DOH with LUS Constructive Notice Hires and well below 99' hires.
When I read through the current LAA seniority list, this seems to be the case and reading the proposed LAA ISL also backs this up. So yes F/T's that flowed prior to the merger have their spot on the LAA list, but flow's since Dec 2013 mix in with new hires.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
When I read through the current LAA seniority list, this seems to be the case and reading the proposed LAA ISL also backs this up. So yes F/T's that flowed prior to the merger have their spot on the LAA list, but flow's since Dec 2013 mix in with new hires.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
#4309
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,482
The problem is, there is a lot of confusion and rumors on the LUS side about flows. I've flown with numerous guys that think that flows not even on property yet (still at Envoy) are going to be put ahead of guys hired in 99 at LUS. As far as I can tell, that's not true at all. In fact, my understanding is guys who flowed after 9 Dec 2013 are flowing into seniority with the class they are in, and hence will be DOH with LUS Constructive Notice Hires and well below 99' hires.
When I read through the current LAA seniority list, this seems to be the case and reading the proposed LAA ISL also backs this up. So yes F/T's that flowed prior to the merger have their spot on the LAA list, but flow's since Dec 2013 mix in with new hires.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
When I read through the current LAA seniority list, this seems to be the case and reading the proposed LAA ISL also backs this up. So yes F/T's that flowed prior to the merger have their spot on the LAA list, but flow's since Dec 2013 mix in with new hires.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
F/T's post 12/9/13 get a seniority number of the class they're in. They're fourth listers(LAA and LUS new hires post snapshot date 12/9/13) and all the fourth listers are (history as a guide) getting stapled by DOH.
I don't know how far behind a '99 hire the new hires will merge into the SLI. The arbs will sort that out and a '99 hire from the 'weakest' group (as identified by the arbs) will be closer to the new hires while a '99 hire from a different group will be farther away from the post 12/9/13 new hires.
#4310
I do this already, though I don't ask them to prove it, I just explain the cross checking that I've already done. To be fair, I haven't heard this rumor to much over the last few months.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post